본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

경찰 다이버전의 문제점과 개선방안

The Problem and Improvement Plan of Police Diversion

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Police diversion is a diversion that is taken at the police level which is the early level of criminal justice. This diversion is devoted to prevent being branded which is the purpose of diversion. It also is an excellent institution towards prevention and nurturing juveniles,so most juvenile delinquencies in Anglo-American world are solved by police diversion. However, the prosecution holds the termination of investigation in South Korea so diversion is not legally acknowledged at the police level. Therefore, it is admitted through warnings,etc in practice. In order to overcome such realistic problem, the legal ground of warnings, etc was found in proportionality of summary jurisdiction or the Constitution. However, this paper supports the idea that the basis for police diversion can be found in the principal of legality of criminal law. It argues that specifying the condition as well as subject is necessary in order to get over the problem of police diversion. Even if the police diversion that is actually accepted can be admitted through interpretative principle of legality regarding legal ground, it has a limitation in the end. Therefore, legislative measures should be taken to solve it fundamentally. For such legislative measures, ex ante as well as ex post control is necessary in order to prevent the arbitrary abuse of police diversion that are practically acknowledged. Vitalizing professional participation in each level should be taken to improve the effect of police diversion and eliminate problems - only a practical effort to relieve worries and mistrust about police diversion can only become an environmental foundation that can legislate police diversion.

Abstract

Police diversion is a diversion that is taken at the police level which is the early level of criminal justice. This diversion is devoted to prevent being branded which is the purpose of diversion. It also is an excellent institution towards prevention and nurturing juveniles,so most juvenile delinquencies in Anglo-American world are solved by police diversion. However, the prosecution holds the termination of investigation in South Korea so diversion is not legally acknowledged at the police level. Therefore, it is admitted through warnings,etc in practice. In order to overcome such realistic problem, the legal ground of warnings, etc was found in proportionality of summary jurisdiction or the Constitution. However, this paper supports the idea that the basis for police diversion can be found in the principal of legality of criminal law. It argues that specifying the condition as well as subject is necessary in order to get over the problem of police diversion. Even if the police diversion that is actually accepted can be admitted through interpretative principle of legality regarding legal ground, it has a limitation in the end. Therefore, legislative measures should be taken to solve it fundamentally. For such legislative measures, ex ante as well as ex post control is necessary in order to prevent the arbitrary abuse of police diversion that are practically acknowledged. Vitalizing professional participation in each level should be taken to improve the effect of police diversion and eliminate problems - only a practical effort to relieve worries and mistrust about police diversion can only become an environmental foundation that can legislate police diversion.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 강영철, "소년사건처리절차의 현황과 개선방안", 소년보호연구, (창간) (1999)
  2. 김보환, "소년형사사법절차상의 문제점에 관한 고찰", 치안논총, 9 (1992), 치안연구소
  3. 김양균, "소년선도보호제도의 배경", 청소년범죄연구, 1 (1983)
  4. 김재봉, "소년경찰과 다이버전", 형사정책, 17(1), pp.33~59 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
  5. 김형훈, "경찰훈방", 경찰학연구, (2) (2000), 경찰대학교
  6. 남미애, "소년사법처리과정 청소년의 스트레스 반응과 교정성에 검?경찰 및 일반인의 사회적 지지가 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 矯正硏究, 14, pp.113~141 (2002), 한국교정학회
  7. 문성도, "파출소장 훈방권의 법적 근거", 경찰대학교 논문집, 15 (1995)
  8. 박윤기, "학교폭력에 대한 경찰의 대응방안에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
  9. 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  10. 이성식, "사회내처우 비행소년과 시설내처우 비행소년의 재범가능성에 대한 비교 연구", 형사정책연구, (9) (1997), 한국형사정책연구원
  11. 이진국, "사회내제재의 가치와 개편", 형사정책연구, 15(2), pp.5~36 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
  12. 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
  13. 전지연, "경찰 다이버젼의 도입필요성과 그 내용", 형사정책, 16(2), pp.187~207 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
  14. 청소년비행예방을 위한 소년보호기관의 역할확대 및 강화방안, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
  15. 최병각, "소년보호사건의 범위와 처리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
  16. 최종식, "소년비행의 대책에 관한 연구", 형사정책, 19(2), pp.87~113 (2007), 한국형사정책학회
  17. 최종식, "일본소년법 개정의 최근 동향(Ⅱ)", 소년법연구, (창간) (2002)
  18. 하태훈, "즉결심판절차와 피고인의 인권", 한국법학원보, (85) (2000)
  19. 한영수, "즉결심판제도에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책연구, 9(1) (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
  20. 경찰통합법에 관한 연구, "홍준형", 치안연구소, ~ (1997)
  21. 경찰청, "사랑의 교실 설치ㆍ운영 세부지침", ~ (1994)
  22. 경찰청, "소년범 다이버전 도입을 위한 전문가참여 사례분석집", ~ (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)