본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유럽연합 소비자권리지침상 청약철회권에 관한 연구 -우리 법과의 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-

A Study on the Right of Withdrawal in the EU Consumer Rights Directive

0

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The right of withdrawal introduced to protect consumers in terms of special consumer contracts could be called the most fundamental right in this field. However, lots of controversy are still being raised, although about 20 years have already passed since the right of withdrawal had been introduced. Also, the environment of consumer contracts is changing a great deal as we enter the 21st century. Accordingly, the controversy on whether the right of withdrawal is really appropriate for the changed consumer contracts environment is being raised. Therefore, it could be said that we’re at a point in time requiring an overall reexamination on the right of withdrawal. Although the approach from very diverse aspects is required for this, one of the typical methods could be called a comparative study with the foreign legislation which solves the problem of this with the theory of legislation. Naturally, the legislation case of a foreign country is not the correct answer. But it would be said that its significance as important data in solving the problem of this is great. From this aspect, the EU consumer rights directive enacted recently is an important material in considering the improvement plan on our legislation. In this paper, the improvement plan on our legislation has been examined while performing a comparative analysis on the details related to the right of withdrawal according to the EU consumer rights directive, the door to door sales act and the electronic commerce consumer protection act. Naturally, the EU consumer rights directive does not present answers on everything. But we cannot deny the fact that it allows a significant implication. However, the details of EU consumer rights directive are not perfect and the fact that in contains some problems is a factor that must be considered in preparing the improvement plan of our legislation. Therefore, the improvement plan on the legislation related to the right of withdrawal in the door to door sales act and the electronic commerce consumer protection act would have to be prepared through a very in-depth investigation on the problems created in the process after accepting the positive factors of the EU consumer rights directive.

Abstract

The right of withdrawal introduced to protect consumers in terms of special consumer contracts could be called the most fundamental right in this field. However, lots of controversy are still being raised, although about 20 years have already passed since the right of withdrawal had been introduced. Also, the environment of consumer contracts is changing a great deal as we enter the 21st century. Accordingly, the controversy on whether the right of withdrawal is really appropriate for the changed consumer contracts environment is being raised. Therefore, it could be said that we’re at a point in time requiring an overall reexamination on the right of withdrawal. Although the approach from very diverse aspects is required for this, one of the typical methods could be called a comparative study with the foreign legislation which solves the problem of this with the theory of legislation. Naturally, the legislation case of a foreign country is not the correct answer. But it would be said that its significance as important data in solving the problem of this is great. From this aspect, the EU consumer rights directive enacted recently is an important material in considering the improvement plan on our legislation. In this paper, the improvement plan on our legislation has been examined while performing a comparative analysis on the details related to the right of withdrawal according to the EU consumer rights directive, the door to door sales act and the electronic commerce consumer protection act. Naturally, the EU consumer rights directive does not present answers on everything. But we cannot deny the fact that it allows a significant implication. However, the details of EU consumer rights directive are not perfect and the fact that in contains some problems is a factor that must be considered in preparing the improvement plan of our legislation. Therefore, the improvement plan on the legislation related to the right of withdrawal in the door to door sales act and the electronic commerce consumer protection act would have to be prepared through a very in-depth investigation on the problems created in the process after accepting the positive factors of the EU consumer rights directive.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2011), 박영사
  2. 김성천, "소비자철회권 비교법 연구" (2010), 한국소비자원
  3. 김준호, "채권법" (2011), 법문사
  4. 김증한, "채권각론" (2006), 박영사
  5. 이병준, "민법사례연습 IV" (2011), 세창출판사
  6. 황진자, "보험 청약철회 문제점 및 개선방안" (2012), 한국소비자원
  7. 고형석, "청약철회권의 행사기간 및 기산일에 관한 연구", 홍익법학, 13(3), pp.295~328 (2012), 법학연구소
  8. 고형석, "방문판매의 정의에 관한 연구", 저스티스, (130), pp.165~194 (2012), 한국법학원[DOI]
  9. 고형석, "소비자계약에 있어서 청약철회권의 적정화에 관한 연구", 소비자문제연구, (38), pp.71~97 (2010), 한국소비자원
  10. 김진우, "소비자철회권의 정당화사유 -방문판매와 통신판매를 중심으로-", 소비자문제연구, (40), pp.141~157 (2011), 한국소비자원
  11. 백경일, "소비자보호법의 존재의의 및 효용성에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 소비자보호법의 규범적 정당성과 경제적 실효성에 대한 분석 -", 법학연구, 49(2), pp.247~292 (2009), 법학연구소
  12. 서희석, "DCFR상 소비자⋅사업자의 정의 -우리 법과의 비교 검토-", 외법논집, 36(2), pp.1~20 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  13. 이병준, "DCFR상 철회권의 행사와 그 법률효과에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 36(2), pp.21~39 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  14. Andreas Schwab, "REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on consumer rights(COM(2008)0614-C7-0349", 2008-2008, 2011), pp.EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 2011[DOI]
  15. Christian von Bar, "Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference(Volume I)" (2010), OXFORD
  16. EU Consumer Rights Directive: getting it right(Volume I: Report), "European Union Committee of the House of Lords", The Stationery Office Limited, ~, pp.HL Paper 126-I (2009)
  17. Jan M. Simits, "The Right to change your mind? Rethinking the usefulness of mandatory rights of Withdrawal in Consumer Contract Law" (2011), FACULTY OF LAW MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY
  18. Rights of Withdrawal, "Marco B.M. Loos", Centre for the Study of European Contract Law, ~, pp.Working Paper Series No. 2009 (2009), 04
  19. "Cooling-Off & Secondary Markets: Consumer Choice in the Digital Domain"[URL]
  20. 內田 貴, "民法 II" (1999), 東京大學出版會
  21. 消費者廳取引ㆍ物價對策課, "特定商取引に關する法律の解說, In 商事法務" (2010)
  22. 圓山 茂夫, "特定商取引法の理論と實務" (2010), 民事法硏究會
  23. ハネスㆍェスラー, "ヨーロッパ私法および消費者法における弱者保護", 民商法雜誌, 137(2) (2007), 有斐閣
  24. 淸水巖, "クーリングㆍオフ制度の37年と課題", 月刊國民生活 (2010), 國民生活センタ-,
  25. 공정거래위원회, "보도자료 : 블리자드 코리아의 전자상거래법 위반행위 시정조치", ~ (2012)
  26. 공정거래위원회, "보도자료 : 스마트폰 앱에서 결제된 사이버캐쉬, 환불받을 수 있습니다", ~ (2012)
  27. 공정거래위원회, "보도자료 : 수험생을 속여온 인터넷강의 업체 제재", ~ (2011)
  28. 공정거래위원회, "보도자료 : 불량 앱(애플리케이션) 30일 이내 환불가능!", ~ (2011)
  29. 공정거래위원회, "보도자료 : 온라인게임 상위 10개 사업자의 불공정한 약관 시정조치", ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)