본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

형사절차에서 변호인의 역할 제고 방안

Enhancing the Role of Lawyer in Criminal Procedure

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Measure of democratization of a country’s criminal justice criminal suspects and defendants involved in ensuring the rights of the defense attorney and personal restraint system and the operating system depends on how that is not an exaggeration. Meanwhile,the Criminal Procedure Code was an infringement of human rights. So the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code of the counsel for institutions and human developmental arrest system was revised. In terms of judicial reform, especially the revised Criminal Procedure 17th lawyer to join when the suspects were investigated, the investigation papers were able to read or copy,so that the course of the investigation was to record. Nevertheless, the accused and the defendant’s rights with respect to defense lawyers accused the right to participate on research and discovery system still had problems. Therefore, awareness of these issues under the suspects and defendants in the investigation and trial procedures for the exercise of rights of defense lawyers that can help to enhance the role of the method needs to be made. When the investigation first step to examine the accused lawyer be able to participate,and an attorney before filing charges, the record of the investigation to be read or copied,and if you investigate the accused can ask for a lawyer so that the images should be recorded. Guarantee the rights of suspects and information about self-determination, the investigation established the authenticity of documents, and to guarantee the authenticity of the statement of the fair and prompt trials for suspects in that you can tell when investigating the involvement of lawyers will have to be guaranteed. The right to assistance of counsel and the right to defend themselves, is a constitutional right. And the accused in order to receive help from a lawyer on-going investigation the investigation within a certain range, even if history is to read the documents should be available to copy. Furthermore, video recordings of statements of the suspects accused in the investigation established the veracity of documents can be recognized and help to obscure the memory play and forced a debate about whether the investigation can be eliminated. Thus accused’s statement video recorded to the fact that you can advance to inform suspects or lawyers video recording has been requested video recording, and accused his statements of video recording that can guarantee the right to receive, and the course of the investigation possibility of coercion that can occur in an investigation is necessary to prevent its source. Enhancing the role of counsel at the trial stage, and measures include pre-trial discovery depositions of the system to create revision and law enforcement agencies information on the recognition and evidence of counsel as a precondition for acceptance of evidence of that can be. First test appeals filed case to the court has continued in that Code of Civil Procedure Section 347 trillion following documents submitted application as well as litigation in command with the court evidence. Apply to documentary evidence and the evidence for the view, or an adapter to apply for, Reading and approval of an adapter to determine whether the court views: an adapter with a range of time and place, and commanded the parties to litigation discovery is desirable to revise the application process. And if you check the court’s discovery does not implement without delay a decision, the court directly, or the defendant (attorney) the variations of these terms, depending on the application of the test reading of the documents, copy, and carry out the issuance of a written hearing process until you to stop, and further examination within the period prescribed by the court if you do not perform the procedure, the court dismissed the appeal decision to allow convicted preferable to revision. Further, the trial operation of the center of the court order made by the investigating authorities of the documents of evidence is necessary to severely restrict. The judicial police officers, as well as checks written by the accused investigative documents and reference is stated documents, the defendants (witnesses), the investigation agency investigators according to the requirements of written statements and other defendants’ statements indicated statement documents the defendant or counsel that an acceptance of or subject to your acceptance will have to be used as evidence.

Abstract

Measure of democratization of a country’s criminal justice criminal suspects and defendants involved in ensuring the rights of the defense attorney and personal restraint system and the operating system depends on how that is not an exaggeration. Meanwhile,the Criminal Procedure Code was an infringement of human rights. So the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code of the counsel for institutions and human developmental arrest system was revised. In terms of judicial reform, especially the revised Criminal Procedure 17th lawyer to join when the suspects were investigated, the investigation papers were able to read or copy,so that the course of the investigation was to record. Nevertheless, the accused and the defendant’s rights with respect to defense lawyers accused the right to participate on research and discovery system still had problems. Therefore, awareness of these issues under the suspects and defendants in the investigation and trial procedures for the exercise of rights of defense lawyers that can help to enhance the role of the method needs to be made. When the investigation first step to examine the accused lawyer be able to participate,and an attorney before filing charges, the record of the investigation to be read or copied,and if you investigate the accused can ask for a lawyer so that the images should be recorded. Guarantee the rights of suspects and information about self-determination, the investigation established the authenticity of documents, and to guarantee the authenticity of the statement of the fair and prompt trials for suspects in that you can tell when investigating the involvement of lawyers will have to be guaranteed. The right to assistance of counsel and the right to defend themselves, is a constitutional right. And the accused in order to receive help from a lawyer on-going investigation the investigation within a certain range, even if history is to read the documents should be available to copy. Furthermore, video recordings of statements of the suspects accused in the investigation established the veracity of documents can be recognized and help to obscure the memory play and forced a debate about whether the investigation can be eliminated. Thus accused’s statement video recorded to the fact that you can advance to inform suspects or lawyers video recording has been requested video recording, and accused his statements of video recording that can guarantee the right to receive, and the course of the investigation possibility of coercion that can occur in an investigation is necessary to prevent its source. Enhancing the role of counsel at the trial stage, and measures include pre-trial discovery depositions of the system to create revision and law enforcement agencies information on the recognition and evidence of counsel as a precondition for acceptance of evidence of that can be. First test appeals filed case to the court has continued in that Code of Civil Procedure Section 347 trillion following documents submitted application as well as litigation in command with the court evidence. Apply to documentary evidence and the evidence for the view, or an adapter to apply for, Reading and approval of an adapter to determine whether the court views: an adapter with a range of time and place, and commanded the parties to litigation discovery is desirable to revise the application process. And if you check the court’s discovery does not implement without delay a decision, the court directly, or the defendant (attorney) the variations of these terms, depending on the application of the test reading of the documents, copy, and carry out the issuance of a written hearing process until you to stop, and further examination within the period prescribed by the court if you do not perform the procedure, the court dismissed the appeal decision to allow convicted preferable to revision. Further, the trial operation of the center of the court order made by the investigating authorities of the documents of evidence is necessary to severely restrict. The judicial police officers, as well as checks written by the accused investigative documents and reference is stated documents, the defendants (witnesses), the investigation agency investigators according to the requirements of written statements and other defendants’ statements indicated statement documents the defendant or counsel that an acceptance of or subject to your acceptance will have to be used as evidence.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김대웅, "변호인의 피의자신문참여권", 형사판례연구, 17, pp.411~447 (2009), 한국형사판례연구회
  2. 김현옥, "변호인 요청 후 변호인과 상담하기 전에 행해진 피의자 조사에서의 진술의 증거능력", 형사법의 신동향, (5) (2006)
  3. 민영성, "공판중심주의와 공정한 재판", 법조, 55(2), pp.94~126 (2006), 법조협회
  4. 박노섭, "수사절차상의 신문과 비디오 녹화제도", 형사정책, 16(1), pp.103~144 (2004), 한국형사정책학회
  5. 배종대, "신형사소송법, 제3판" (2011), 홍문사
  6. 송호창, "피의자신문과정에서 변호인 참여권", JURIST, (406) (2004)
  7. 신대철, "형사소송법상 증거개시에 관한 연구", 형사법연구, (9) (1997), 한국형사법학회
  8. 신양균, "개정 형사소송법의 쟁점과 과제", 형사재판의 제문제, 6 (2009), 형사실무연구회
  9. 이승련, "개정 형사소송법상의 증거개시제도", 법조, 57(2), pp.224~253 (2008), 법조협회
  10. 이영한, "새로운 형사소송법에서의 조서와 영상녹화", 법조, 57(2), pp.69~131 (2008), 법조협회
  11. 이용구, "증거개시에 관한 입법례" (2006), 법제도개혁추진위원회 자료집
  12. 이용구, "형사소송법 개정의 문제점 - 공판부분", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.57~115 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  13. 이정수, "검사 작성 조서의 진정성립과 증거능력 - 실질적 진정성립 추정 여부와 그 인정방법", 법조, 54(6), pp.205~232 (2005), 법조협회
  14. 이호중, "검사의 증거개시의무와 수사기록 열람․등사의 거부에 대한 규제방안", 형사법연구, 21(2), pp.195~226 (2009), 한국형사법학회
  15. 정웅석, "영상녹화물의 증거능력 인정에 관한 연구* - 법무부 개정안을 중심으로", 형사법의 신동향, (29), pp.114~237 (2010), 대검찰청
  16. 조국, "검사작성 피의자신문조서와 영상녹화물의 증거능력", 저스티스, (107), pp.171~192 (2008), 한국법학원
  17. 천진호, "개정 형사소송법상 형사피의자·피고인의 방어권 보장", 저스티스, (103), pp.112~129 (2008), 한국법학원
  18. 배심원 설득의 효율성 제고를 위한 입체영상, 시뮬레이션 등 다양한 시각자료 제작 및 활용방안에 대한 연구, "천진호", 대검찰청 검찰미래기획단, ~ (2008)
  19. 천진호, "증거방법으로서 영상녹화물 활용 방안 연구", 동아법학, (52), pp.447~473 (2011), 법학연구소
  20. 형사증거개시제도에 관한 연구, "탁희성", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
  21. 미국 수사과정에서의 영상녹화제에 대한 연구, "하태훈", 대검찰청 연구보고서, ~ (2006)
  22. 하태훈, "한국형사법학회 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 논평 - 수사 일반과 강제처분 부분", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.3~26 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  23. 허인석, "영상녹화제도의 합리적 운용과 발전방향", 법조, 57(9), pp.47~107 (2008), 법조협회
  24. 황경환, "형사소송법상 증거개시제도에 대한 법적 소고 -헌법적 평가 및 미국제도와 비교하여-", 한양법학, (25), pp.163~188 (2009), 한양법학회
  25. 형사소송법 개정연구, "한국형사법학회 형사소송법 개정특별위원회", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
  26. 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정안 설명자료", ~ (2001)
  27. 법원행정처, "새로운 형사재판의 이해-형사소송법 개정에 따른 변화와 과제", ~ (2007)
  28. 법무부, "개정 형사소송법", ~ (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)