본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수사절차에 관한 개정형사소송법의 내용 검토

A Study on the Investigation Procedure on the Reformed Criminal Procedure Law

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This discussion in this paper on the investigation procedure on the reformed criminal procedure law can be briefly summarized as follows. The arrest and detention of a suspect is a kind of necessary evil for efficient execution of criminal procedure. However thinking the investigation by compulsion give severe pain to the suspect, how to mix them is also a very important problem that we have to solve. In this thesis, I pointed out the problems of our investigation system on the current and reformed our criminal procedure law, and suggested my opinions on them especially from the point of legislation. Of course I am very cautious in dealing this problems between the efficiency of criminal sanction and the protection of the fundamental human rights. At first, the criminal investigator may ask the warrant for detention to the judge in 48 hours basically in case of emergency arrest according to the current and reformed our criminal procedure law, but it must be changed to ask the warrant for arrest before asking the warrant for detention in the same period. And the possibility for fighting against the decesions made by judge on their arrest and detention has to be guaranteed. But it is impossible to interpret our current or reformed criminal procedure law like that. So this is no more than a legislative opinion of mine. Second, I thinkt our emergency search and seizure system accompanying by emergency arrest should be repealed. Because it is doubtful whether it violates the substantial spirit of constitutional law on warrant. Third, the attorney's right to participate in the suspect's questioning are the basic right on the constitution, which comes from the right of suspects to make an attorney help him. So the reformed criminal procedure law stipulated this right for the purpose of deterrence illegal criminal investigation and protect the principle of due process of law. But it has some problems concerning the standard of its limitation. It must be more concrete and clear, and I expect resonable Supreme Court's decision. And finally, the reformed criminal procedure law also stipulated 'the discovery' in a restricted form. But the right to ask discovering documents and evidences must be extended to the investigation procedure.

Abstract

This discussion in this paper on the investigation procedure on the reformed criminal procedure law can be briefly summarized as follows. The arrest and detention of a suspect is a kind of necessary evil for efficient execution of criminal procedure. However thinking the investigation by compulsion give severe pain to the suspect, how to mix them is also a very important problem that we have to solve. In this thesis, I pointed out the problems of our investigation system on the current and reformed our criminal procedure law, and suggested my opinions on them especially from the point of legislation. Of course I am very cautious in dealing this problems between the efficiency of criminal sanction and the protection of the fundamental human rights. At first, the criminal investigator may ask the warrant for detention to the judge in 48 hours basically in case of emergency arrest according to the current and reformed our criminal procedure law, but it must be changed to ask the warrant for arrest before asking the warrant for detention in the same period. And the possibility for fighting against the decesions made by judge on their arrest and detention has to be guaranteed. But it is impossible to interpret our current or reformed criminal procedure law like that. So this is no more than a legislative opinion of mine. Second, I thinkt our emergency search and seizure system accompanying by emergency arrest should be repealed. Because it is doubtful whether it violates the substantial spirit of constitutional law on warrant. Third, the attorney's right to participate in the suspect's questioning are the basic right on the constitution, which comes from the right of suspects to make an attorney help him. So the reformed criminal procedure law stipulated this right for the purpose of deterrence illegal criminal investigation and protect the principle of due process of law. But it has some problems concerning the standard of its limitation. It must be more concrete and clear, and I expect resonable Supreme Court's decision. And finally, the reformed criminal procedure law also stipulated 'the discovery' in a restricted form. But the right to ask discovering documents and evidences must be extended to the investigation procedure.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 백형구, "형사소송법강의" (2001)
  2. 심희기, "형사소송법의 쟁점" (2004)
  3. 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설" (2007), 법원행정처
  4. 법무부, "개정형사소송법" (2007), 법무부
  5. 박기석, "진술거부권과 양형", 15(1) (2003), 한국형사정책학회
  6. 신동운, "인신구속제도를 둘러싼 법적용의 왜곡과 그 해결방안", 39(1) (1998), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  7. 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 영장항고", (9) (2007), 대검찰청
  8. 이완규, "개정 형사소송법에서의 수사절차상 진술의 증거능력", (8) (2007), 대검찰청
  9. 정진수, "인신구속제도와 구속심사제도의 개선방안", 9(3) (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
  10. 조상제, "현행 형사소송법상 체포제도의 문제점", 3집 (1998), 계명대학교법학연구소
  11. 최영승, "형사절차상 피의자?피고인의 권리의 회고 및 전망, 사회변동과 한국의 형사법학" (2007)
  12. 황정근, "구속영장실질심사제도의 개선방안", 8(4) (1997), 한국형사정책연구원
  13. 福井 厚, "刑事訴訟法講義" (2003), 法律文化社
  14. 村井敏邦, "刑事司法改革と刑事訴訟法" (2007), 日本評論社
  15. 大野正博, "現代型搜査とその規制" (2001), 成文堂
  16. 多田辰也, "被疑者取調べとその適正化" (1999), 成文堂
  17. 後藤 昭, "搜査法の論理" (2001), 岩波書店
  18. 井上正仁, "强制搜査と任意搜査" (2006), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)