Expansion and development of the right to counsel in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to review how the right to have counsel has been established in the Korean criminal procedures, and also it is aimed at taking a view of expanded and developed procedure through revision processes of law since then. This paper deals with the history and current contents of criminal proceedings, including the direction of improvement, centering on the symbolic and core rights of counsel and defendant in order to secure and stand on their defendant's right to have counsel. About the censoring the documents and other stuff received by a suspect during an interview with an attorney, it is required to stipulate rational reasons for doubt in order not to infringe suspect's right to interview with attorney and exchange information. The right to interview and exchange information shall be given to a suspect taken to an investigation institution in the form of voluntary traveling shall be considered. As for attorney's right to participation in suspect interrogations, it is required to carry out institutional improvement in which the restrictions on participation that have been stipulated in an excessively abstract manner is concretized.
Abstract
This paper aims to review how the right to have counsel has been established in the Korean criminal procedures, and also it is aimed at taking a view of expanded and developed procedure through revision processes of law since then. This paper deals with the history and current contents of criminal proceedings, including the direction of improvement, centering on the symbolic and core rights of counsel and defendant in order to secure and stand on their defendant's right to have counsel. About the censoring the documents and other stuff received by a suspect during an interview with an attorney, it is required to stipulate rational reasons for doubt in order not to infringe suspect's right to interview with attorney and exchange information. The right to interview and exchange information shall be given to a suspect taken to an investigation institution in the form of voluntary traveling shall be considered. As for attorney's right to participation in suspect interrogations, it is required to carry out institutional improvement in which the restrictions on participation that have been stipulated in an excessively abstract manner is concretized.
참고문헌 (37)
- Nak-in Sung, "Constitutional Law", 355~ (2011)
- "See Constitutional Court, 93Hun-ma120", ~ (1994)
- Hun-hee Han, "Review on Counseling System in Criminal Procedure", 박사, pp.2012
- Jae-sang Lee, "Criminal Procedures", 27~ (2012)
- Mi-suk Park, "Guarantee of Rights of Counsel for Suspects", 박사, pp.1985
- "Korea Times", ~ (2002)
- "The Hank yoreh", ~ (2010)
- Dong-woon Shin, "New Lectures on Criminal Procedures", 90~ (2009)
- "Constitutional Court, 91Hun-ma111", ~ (1992)
- 강동욱, "헌법재판소 결정이 형사절차상의 변호권보장에 미친 영향 - 지난 20년간의 헌법재판소 결정례를 중심으로 -", 법과정책연구, 9(1), pp.357~376 (2009), 한국법정책학회
- "Supreme Court", ~
- Kuk Cho, "Review on Attorney’'s Right to Participation in Suspect Interrogation", JURIS T, 7, pp.49~50 (2004)
- "Criminal Procedure Code art. 311", ~
- Kyong-Hwan Hwang, "The Legal Review of Criminal Discovery", Han Yang Law Review, 20(1), pp.172~173 (2009)
- "Rules on Criminal Procedure art. 118", ~
- Il-kyo Seo, "Criminal Procedure Code 95", ~ (1973)
- Hyeong-gu Baek, "Lecture on Criminal Procedure Code", 105~106 (2001)
- Jae-sang Lee, "Criminal Procedure Code", 150~ (1994)
- Dong-woon Shin, "Criminal Procudure Code", 382~ (1993)
- 이승련, "개정 형사소송법상의 증거개시제도", 법조, 57(2), pp.224~253 (2008), 법조협회
- "Constitutional Court, 2009Hun-ma257", ~ (2009)
- 신양균, "수사절차에서 변호인의 기록열람·등사권", 법조, 53(7), pp.161~192 (2004), 법조협회
- 조기영, "피의자의 열람 · 등사권", 형사법연구, 20(3), pp.149~166 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- 권영법, "공소제기 전 수사서류의 열람·등사권", 법조, 60(8), pp.254~280 (2011), 법조협회
- "Constitutional Court, 2000Hun-ma474", ~ (2003)
- 윤영철, "피의자신문에 대한 변호인의 참여권에 관한 소고- 변호인의 피의자신문참여권의 정당성과 법무부의 형사소송법개정안의 문제점을 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구, 16(1), pp.55~92 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정진연, "헌법상 변호인의 조력을 받을 권리의 내용과 한계", 성균관법학, 18(3), pp.633~660 (2006), 법학연구소
- Ho-chang Song, "Attorney’'s right to participation in the process of suspect interrogation", JURIST, 7, pp.45~46 (2004)
- 천진호, "개정 형사소송법상 형사피의자·피고인의 방어권 보장", 저스티스, 103(103), pp.112~129 (2008), 한국법학원
- See Wan-gyu Lee, "Legal characteristics of attorney’'s participation in suspect interrogation", New tendency of Criminal Law, 5, pp.36~ (2006)
- "Constitutional Court. See Supreme Court, 2003Mo402", ~ (2003)
- "Constitutional Court, 2000Hun-ma138", ~ (2004)
- "Constitutional Court, 2000Hun-ma138", ~ (2004)
- 변필건, "辯護人의 被疑者訊問 參與權의 制限에 대한 比較法的 考察", 법조, 58(2), pp.206~252 (2009), 법조협회
- Gang-Ho Song, "A Study for the system of attorney participation in the process of interrogation", FORUM [THE JOURNAL OF HALLYM LAW FORUM, 20, pp.58~ (2009)
- 최석윤, "변호인의 피의자신문참여권에 대한 비교법적 연구", 형사정책연구, 23(4), pp.63~90 (2012), 한국형사정책연구원
- Do-hyeon Cho, "A Study on Attorney’'s participation in Investigation Procedure", Collection of law treatises, 16(2), pp.23~ (2009)