성년후견인의 양성 및 관리방안
A Proposal for Training and Management System for the Adult Guardian
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, the revision of the Civil Code shall be implemented from July 1, 2013. Adult guardianship is successfully settled in our country in order to be guardians to ensure high quality. This article describes an first consideration of Japanese and german adult guardianship system in operation particularly training and management system for the adult guardian. Japanese and German experience to secure the candidate for adult guardian indicate the tentative plan for introduction of the adult guardianship system for our country. Any suitable, willing and able adult or institution, may be appointed guardian. The Family Court may also appoint co-guardians. The Court will make the final decision based on the best interests of the person. The guardian should be careful to keep the money in the ward’s estate separate from the guardian’s own estate, maintaining separate accounts and keeping careful records of all financial transactions. Before appointing a guardian, the Judge must be persuaded that: The person is incapacitated; The person needs someone to make personal decisions for him or her and/or manage his or her affairs; and The proposed guardian is suitable, willing and able If a guardian is required, however, the court may appoint any person whose appointment would be in the best interest of the incapacitated person. Once an individual is appointed Guardian over an incapacitated adult, the Guardian then has powers and duties. The guardian makes decisions about how the person lives,including their residence, health care, food, and social activity. The guardian is supposed to consider the wishes of the incapacitated person, as well as their previously established valued, when making these living decisions.
Abstract
In Korea, the revision of the Civil Code shall be implemented from July 1, 2013. Adult guardianship is successfully settled in our country in order to be guardians to ensure high quality. This article describes an first consideration of Japanese and german adult guardianship system in operation particularly training and management system for the adult guardian. Japanese and German experience to secure the candidate for adult guardian indicate the tentative plan for introduction of the adult guardianship system for our country. Any suitable, willing and able adult or institution, may be appointed guardian. The Family Court may also appoint co-guardians. The Court will make the final decision based on the best interests of the person. The guardian should be careful to keep the money in the ward’s estate separate from the guardian’s own estate, maintaining separate accounts and keeping careful records of all financial transactions. Before appointing a guardian, the Judge must be persuaded that: The person is incapacitated; The person needs someone to make personal decisions for him or her and/or manage his or her affairs; and The proposed guardian is suitable, willing and able If a guardian is required, however, the court may appoint any person whose appointment would be in the best interest of the incapacitated person. Once an individual is appointed Guardian over an incapacitated adult, the Guardian then has powers and duties. The guardian makes decisions about how the person lives,including their residence, health care, food, and social activity. The guardian is supposed to consider the wishes of the incapacitated person, as well as their previously established valued, when making these living decisions.
참고문헌 (13)
- 엄덕수, "성년후견인력의 양성과 선결과제", 성년후견제 올바른 정착을 위한 후견인 양성방안 토론회
- 전형미, "일본의 성년후견제도에 있어서 제3자후견인 확보에 관한 연구 : 지역사회복지협의회의 역할을 중심으로", 아시아연구, 11(1), pp.157~181 (2008), 한국아시아학회
- 장애인성년후견제 운영방안 마련연구, "한국사회복지협의회", ~ (2011)
- Georg Dodegge, "Betreuungsrecht : systematischer Praxiskommentar", ~ (1995)
- Peter Kleinz, "Organisierte Einzelbetretung-ein Modell mit Zukunnft?", BtOrax, ~ (1993)
- Peter Kleinz, "Problem und Chancen der Umsetzung des Betreuungsgesetzes in der verbandlichen Praxis", ~ (1990)
- 大貫正男, "市民後見人を考える", 實踐 成年後見 No 18, ~ (2006)
- 市民後見人報告, "芳賀裕", ~, pp.No. 36 (2011)
- 上山泰, "專門職後見人と身上監護 2版" (2010), 民事法硏究會
- 小田正二, "成年後見事件の槪況と家裁における運用の實情", 法律のひろば, 63(8)
- 田山輝明, "續 成年後見法制の硏究" (2002), 成文堂
- 岡田和代, "成年後見制度シンポジウム -もっと身近な成年後見制度を目指して-傍聽記", 實踐成年後見 5号, ~ (2003)
- 靑木仁美, "成年後見人の確保に対する日本とドイツの取り組みについて(1)-(4)", 早稲田大學大學院法硏論集, (121) (2007)
