후견법인의 역할과 기능에 관한 입법적 제안: 후견제도 운영 주체로 설정할 필요성을 중심으로
A Legislative Proposal for the Role and Function of Guardianship Corporations: Focused on the Necessity of Setting Guardianship Corporations as Operating Entities for the Guardianship System
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Under the new adult guardianship system, which was introduced by the Adult Guardianship Act 2011 (the Revising Some Part of Civil Code Act), legal person can be appointed as a guardian. This paper deals with the necessities not only of opening to legal persons the possibilities of providing guardianship services including supervisory guardianship services, but also of letting legal persons participate in the operation of the new adult guardianship system. The operation of guardianship system can, by its nature, be subject to family courts and an administration department, whose proper candidates can be ministry of health and welfare and ministry of justice, but which this paper premises is ministry of health and welfare. In this regard, this paper suggests that even though it is necessary for legal persons to be invited to participate in the operation of adult guardianship system, the provision of guardianship services cannot be restricted to legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system. In other words, it in unnecessary to regulate the qualification of legal persons eligible for the provision of guardianship services by special acts. The provision of guardianship services is open to all the legal persons, regardless of whether non-profit organization or for-profit organization. On the other hand, Moreover this paper suggests that the choice and role of legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system be regulated in each social welfare laws relevant to persons with dementia, persons with developmental disabilities and persons with mental illness. For supporting the arguments it suggests, this paper introduces the role models from UK, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Korean practices.
Abstract
Under the new adult guardianship system, which was introduced by the Adult Guardianship Act 2011 (the Revising Some Part of Civil Code Act), legal person can be appointed as a guardian. This paper deals with the necessities not only of opening to legal persons the possibilities of providing guardianship services including supervisory guardianship services, but also of letting legal persons participate in the operation of the new adult guardianship system. The operation of guardianship system can, by its nature, be subject to family courts and an administration department, whose proper candidates can be ministry of health and welfare and ministry of justice, but which this paper premises is ministry of health and welfare. In this regard, this paper suggests that even though it is necessary for legal persons to be invited to participate in the operation of adult guardianship system, the provision of guardianship services cannot be restricted to legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system. In other words, it in unnecessary to regulate the qualification of legal persons eligible for the provision of guardianship services by special acts. The provision of guardianship services is open to all the legal persons, regardless of whether non-profit organization or for-profit organization. On the other hand, Moreover this paper suggests that the choice and role of legal persons which are invited to participate in the operation of guardianship system be regulated in each social welfare laws relevant to persons with dementia, persons with developmental disabilities and persons with mental illness. For supporting the arguments it suggests, this paper introduces the role models from UK, Germany, Japan, Taiwan and Korean practices.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김은효, "성년후견감독인의 현황과 과제", 성년후견, (3) (2015)
- 김형석, "013년 개정민법자료집 하" (2012)
- 박인환, "법인후견의 제도구상과 실천방향", 한국부모회, 2015, ~
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 박인환, "UN장애인권리협약과 성년후견 패러다임의 전환—의사결정대행에서 의사결정지원으로—", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.171~220 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 법무부 민법개정자료발간팀, "2013년 개정민법자료집 상" (2012)
- 보건복지부, "2016 희망복지지원단 업무안내", ~ (2016)
- 우주형, "2013년 개정민법자료집 하" (2012)
- 윤진수, "2013년 개정민법해설" (2013), 법무부
- 전병주, "일본 성년후견인의 유형 동향과 한국에의 시사점 - 岡山지역의 법인후견을 중심으로 -", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(4), pp.187~197 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 제철웅, "유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.205~244 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 제철웅, "고령자의 판단능력 쇠퇴를 대비한 미래설계와 새로운 성년후견제도", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.149~175 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 제철웅, "가족생활의 형사법적 보호와 민사법적 보호 간의 긴장 - 노인학대 등에 대한 국가개입의 방법을 중심으로 -", 가족법연구, 29(3), pp.399~446 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 타타누마 히로시, "일본 법인후견의 실천과 전망", 성년후견, (2) (2014)
- 登學仁, "成年後見制度" (2014), 加除出版社
- 梶村太市, "實務講座 家事事件法" (2013), 加除出版社
- 社會福祉協議會における地域福祉を基盤とする成年後見制度への取り組みの基本的考え方と實務, 地域社會が支える成年後見制度推進事業報告書, "社會福祉法人 全國社會福祉協議會", ~ (2011)
- 上山泰, "專門職後見人と身上監護" (2010), 민사법연구회
- 法人後見のあり方等に関する調査研究事業報告書, "上田晴男", 特定非營利活動法人PASネット, ~ (2014)
- 西森和樹, "立法過程からみた法人後見お制度趣旨成年後見小委員會審議を中心として", 横浜法學, 22(2) (2013)
- 成年後見制度の現狀の分析と課題の檢討成年後見制度の更なる圓滑な利用に向 けて, "成年後見制度硏究會", ~ (2010)
- 新潟県, "成年後見制度法人後見業務マニュアル", ~ (2015)
- 李秋君, "弘道執行成年監護-監護人職務", 한국-대만 후견전문가 간담회(2016.1.29) 발표자료집 (2016)
- 黃時順, "成年後見制度" (2014), 加除出版社
- Cheolung Je, "Liber Amicorum Makoto Arai" (2015), Nomos
- Damrau, "Betreuungsrecht" (2011), Kohlhammer
- Denzil Lush, "Court of Protection Practice and Procedure in England and Wales", 한국비교사법학회 2013년 추계국제학술대회(성년후견제와 의사결정장애인의 보호) 자료집 (2013)
- Graham Moffat, "Trusts Law" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Köhl, "Rechtliche Betreuung in Deutschland" (2009), Bundesanzeiger
- Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht", C.H. Beck
- Sieh-chuen Huang, "Liber Amicorum Makoto Arai" (2015), Nomos
- Zimmermann, "Betreuungsrecht von A-Z" (2007), Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag