구어 말뭉치와 한국어 교재에서의 담화표지 ‘좀’의 기능 비교 연구
A Study on the Function of Discourse Marker jom: Focusing on Comparison Between Spoken Corpus and Korean Textbooks
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study is to describe and analyze discourse function of ‘jom(좀)’ based on spoken corpus, and to compare the results with theirs of Korean textbook. This research is conducted based on Sejong Spoken Corpus (270,000 words) and 4 college textbooks used in educational institutions in Korea. The results of this study show that: 1) The representative discourse functions of ‘jom(좀)’ have following four categories: ‘politeness’, ‘utterance mitigation’, ‘focus’, and ‘delay’; 2) ‘Utterance mitigation’ is the highest frequent in the spoken corpus while ‘Politeness’ is the highest frequent in the Korean textbook; 3) A frequency rank among these 4 discourse functions is vary depending on the domain of textbooks; 4) ‘Politeness’ has the highest frequency in the integrated textbook. (Yonsei) while ‘Utterance mitigation’ has the highest frequency in the textbooks for speaking and reading.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to describe and analyze discourse function of ‘jom(좀)’ based on spoken corpus, and to compare the results with theirs of Korean textbook. This research is conducted based on Sejong Spoken Corpus (270,000 words) and 4 college textbooks used in educational institutions in Korea. The results of this study show that: 1) The representative discourse functions of ‘jom(좀)’ have following four categories: ‘politeness’, ‘utterance mitigation’, ‘focus’, and ‘delay’; 2) ‘Utterance mitigation’ is the highest frequent in the spoken corpus while ‘Politeness’ is the highest frequent in the Korean textbook; 3) A frequency rank among these 4 discourse functions is vary depending on the domain of textbooks; 4) ‘Politeness’ has the highest frequency in the integrated textbook. (Yonsei) while ‘Utterance mitigation’ has the highest frequency in the textbooks for speaking and reading.
참고문헌 (13)
- 강소영, "구어와 문어 자료의 실제적 연구 방법론" (2007), 한국문화사
- 목정수, "｛좀｝의 기능과 문법화", 언어학, (28), pp.77~100 (2001), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 박혜선, "담화표지어 ‘좀’ 사용 연구: 중국인 한국어 학습자를 대상으로", 응용언어학, 27(1), pp.29~52 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
- Hye Seung Lee, "Perception and production of Korean discourse marker com (좀) by KFL and KHL students", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 38, pp.197~226 (2013), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 서상규, "한국어 기본어휘 연구" (2013), 한국문화사
- 손세모돌, "“좀"의 상황적 의미", 동아시아문화연구, 14, pp.477~508 (1988), 漢陽大學校 韓國學硏究所)
- 송인성, "담화표지 {좀}의 기능과 형태·운율적 특성의 실현 양상", 한국어학, 62, pp.315~339 (2014), 한국어학회
- 안의정, "말뭉치를 이용한 어휘의 구어성 측정과 활용", 어문논집, (57), pp.93~119 (2008), 민족어문학회
- 안주호, "축약형 담화표지 “좀", 막”에 대한 연구, 2009, pp.(14), 199~223[DOI]
- 임유종, "“좀", 조금”에 대하여, 1995, pp.13, 1081~1101[DOI]
- 주경희, "‘좀’과 ‘조금’", 국어학, 36, pp.379~399 (2000), 국어학회
- 주경희, "대화에서의 ‘좀’의 기능", 국어국문학, 126, pp.75~99 (2000), 국어국문학회
- 주경희, "‘좀’ 문법화의 의미 화용론적 연구", 국어교육, (115), pp.433~453 (2004), 한국어교육학회