한국어 관용 표현의 의미 투명도에 대한 인식 조사 연구 - 중국어권 화자와 영어권 화자를 대상으로 -
A Study on the Perception Transparency in Korean Idiomatic Expressions
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has a purpose to prepare efficient learning method of Korean idiomatic expressions by choosing the basic idiomatic expressions and looking at the semantic transparency of Korean idiomatic expressions and differences by language for foreigners English and Chinese. In many previous studies, there has been a direct relationship between semantic transparency and Korean idiomatic expressions, there have been few empirical studies. In addition, there are no studies comparing differences between English and Chinese. The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in the meaning of the Korean idiomatic expressions according to the semantic transparency and by language. This paper analyzed the semantic of Korean idiomatic expressions and difference by language through the analysis of variance. This study was conducted under the hypothesis that the semantic transparency of the idiomatic expressions influences the understanding of the meaning of idiomatic expressions and by language. The experiment divided the questionnaire of 30 questions and selected the idiomatic expressions corresponding to the sentence or the same meaning as the underlined idiomatic expressions. As a result, first, there was a difference according to the semantic transparency of idiomatic expression. Semi-transparency with high semantic transparency showed high correct answer rate, and semi-opaque and opaque had low correct answer rate. The results of this experiment did not show the differences of the idiomatic expressions by language in the analysis of variance, but showed a significant difference according to the correct answer rate per question. The hypothesis of this study is supported by the premise of previous studies that there will be distinct differences in understanding meanings according to semantic transparency.
Abstract
This study has a purpose to prepare efficient learning method of Korean idiomatic expressions by choosing the basic idiomatic expressions and looking at the semantic transparency of Korean idiomatic expressions and differences by language for foreigners English and Chinese. In many previous studies, there has been a direct relationship between semantic transparency and Korean idiomatic expressions, there have been few empirical studies. In addition, there are no studies comparing differences between English and Chinese. The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in the meaning of the Korean idiomatic expressions according to the semantic transparency and by language. This paper analyzed the semantic of Korean idiomatic expressions and difference by language through the analysis of variance. This study was conducted under the hypothesis that the semantic transparency of the idiomatic expressions influences the understanding of the meaning of idiomatic expressions and by language. The experiment divided the questionnaire of 30 questions and selected the idiomatic expressions corresponding to the sentence or the same meaning as the underlined idiomatic expressions. As a result, first, there was a difference according to the semantic transparency of idiomatic expression. Semi-transparency with high semantic transparency showed high correct answer rate, and semi-opaque and opaque had low correct answer rate. The results of this experiment did not show the differences of the idiomatic expressions by language in the analysis of variance, but showed a significant difference according to the correct answer rate per question. The hypothesis of this study is supported by the premise of previous studies that there will be distinct differences in understanding meanings according to semantic transparency.
참고문헌 (34)
- 광철, "중국조선어문 1", pp.52~52 (1985), 길림성민족사무위원회
- 金文昌, "國語慣用語의 연구", 석사, pp.1975
- 김부경, "중국인 한국어 학습자를 위한 관용어 교육 목록 구성", 동북아 문화연구, 1(34), pp.261~277 (2013), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 김종택, "이디엄(idiom)연구", 어문학, 25, pp.97~112 (1971), 한국어문학
- 까오페이, "한국어 관용 표현 교육 방안 연구-중국 학습자를 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2016
- 나세르자노바, "한국어와 러시아어의 신체 관용 표현 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2016
- 문금현, "외국어로서의 한국어 관용 표현의 교육", 이중언어학, 15, pp.207~233 (1998), 이중언어학회
- 문금현, "국어 관용 표현 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 민현식, "관용 표현의 범위와 유형에 대한 재고", 한국어 의미학, 12, pp.17~50 (2003), 한국어의미학회
- 박명식, "동과 서: 그 의식구조의 차이" (1992), 탐구당
- 박영순, "관용어에 대하여", 국어교육, 53, pp.105~121 (1985), 한국어교육학회
- 변명선, "독일어와 한국어 신체어휘 손 관용 표현 연구", 人文科學論集, 26, pp.149~175 (2003), 清州大學校 人文科學研究所
- 서경숙, "숙어 학습과 의미 투명도의 상관성 연구", 돈암어문학, 31, pp.285~316 (2017), 돈암어문학회[DOI]
- 성소연, "청각장애인의 관용어 이해 능력에 관한 연구", 석사, 청각ㆍ언어장애아교육, pp.2008
- 송현아, "몽골인을 위한 한국어 관용어 교육 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2008
- 엥사흐롤, "한국어와 몽골어 신체 관용어 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2003
- 오신원, "일본인 학습자 대상 관용어 이해 교육 방안 : 문학 작품 창가의 토토를 활용하여", 석사, pp.2016
- 웅계지, "한국어와 중국어의 신체 관련 관용어 대조연구 : '눈', '머리', '손', '입' 을 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 이양금, "한․영 대조를 통한 한국어 관용어 교육의 효과", 응용언어학, 27(1), pp.77~105 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
- 임혜진, "학습자 수준별 관용표현 교수항목에 대한 연구 : 의미 투명도와 사용빈도를 바탕으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2007
- 崔炅鳳, "國語 慣用語 硏究", 석사, 국어국문, pp.1993
- 최수진, "관용어 의미의 투명성을 고려한 교육용 관용어 목록 연구 : 중학교 1학년 학생을 중심으로", 석사, 국어교육전공, pp.2013
- 현혜숙, "읽기이해부진 아동과 일반 아동의 문맥 유무 및 관용어 유형에 따른 관용어 이해능력 비교", 석사, 언어병리학, pp.2010
- 황정남, "한국어와 루마니아어 관용어의 비교연구 : 신체관련 어휘를 중심으로", 석사, 동유럽어문학, pp.1999
- Caillies, Stéphanie, "The Relation between Children’s Reading Comprehension Level and Their Comprehension of Idioms", Journal of experimental child psychology, 90, pp.65~87 (2006)
- Gibbs, Raymond W., "Using Metaphors as Modifiers: Children’s Production of Metaphoric Compound", Journal of Child Language, 24, pp.567~601 (1991)
- Hansen, A., "Mass communication research methods" (1998), Macmillan Press
- Langlotz, A., "Idiomatic Creativity" (2006), John Benjamins
- Levorato, Chiara M., "Idiom Comprehension in Children: Are the Effects of Semantic Analysability and Context Separable?", European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, pp.521~529 (1999)
- Nippold, Marilyn A., "Judgments of Idiom Familiarity and Transparency: A Comparison of Children and Adolescents", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, pp.384~391 (2002)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- "국어대사전" (1983), 민중서림
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원, "(고려대)한국어대사전" (2009), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원