본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 교사의 말하기 평가 구인에 관한 인식 연구

Korean Language Teachers’Perception Study on the Construct of Speaking Ability Test

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This article is aimed at to investigate and analyse what the Korean language teachers’ perception is about the construct of speaking test. The TOPIK speaking is for general purpose of students. ACTFL_Speaking, TOEIC_Speaking, and IELTS_Speaking are the representative tests to evaluate general purpose of speaking ability at present. The researcher investigated and analysed core constructs from these three tests. Core constructs were categorized into novice, intermediate, and advanced levels according to CEFR(Common European Framework of Reference for Languages). Korean teachers answered fluency, accuracy, and pronunciation are the core construct to evaluate learners’ proficiency. It was revealed that the construct of accuracy and ability to perform task is the most important factor to distinguish between novice and intermediate level of students. On the contrary, fluency and the quality of discourse were the core construct of between intermediate and advanced levels. The teachers answered that the goal of advanced level of should be set up among language learners who are learning Korean as a second language. Finally, there was a significant group difference about core construct, the definition of accuracy and fluency and subordinate construct, the way of valuing core ration compared to proficiency levels, and the construct of pronunciation according to teachers’ teaching experiences.

Abstract

This article is aimed at to investigate and analyse what the Korean language teachers’ perception is about the construct of speaking test. The TOPIK speaking is for general purpose of students. ACTFL_Speaking, TOEIC_Speaking, and IELTS_Speaking are the representative tests to evaluate general purpose of speaking ability at present. The researcher investigated and analysed core constructs from these three tests. Core constructs were categorized into novice, intermediate, and advanced levels according to CEFR(Common European Framework of Reference for Languages). Korean teachers answered fluency, accuracy, and pronunciation are the core construct to evaluate learners’ proficiency. It was revealed that the construct of accuracy and ability to perform task is the most important factor to distinguish between novice and intermediate level of students. On the contrary, fluency and the quality of discourse were the core construct of between intermediate and advanced levels. The teachers answered that the goal of advanced level of should be set up among language learners who are learning Korean as a second language. Finally, there was a significant group difference about core construct, the definition of accuracy and fluency and subordinate construct, the way of valuing core ration compared to proficiency levels, and the construct of pronunciation according to teachers’ teaching experiences.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 강소산, "한국어 말하기 성취도 평가에 대한 교사의 인식과 말하기 평가 효능감", 화법연구, (30), pp.1~36 (2015), 한국화법학회[DOI]
  2. 김나미, "말하기 유창성 평가에서의 평가 구인 간 상관관계 -한국어 중급 학습자의 발화를 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 59, pp.87~108 (2018), 한국어의미학회
  3. 김정숙, "한국어 말하기 능력 구인 설정을 위한 기초 연구", 한국어교육, 25(4), pp.1~21 (2014), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  4. 김지영, "한국어 말하기 평가에서의 채점 편향성 분석", 이중언어학, (70), pp.59~83 (2018), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  5. 송향근, "예비교사 교육과정에 대한 한국어교사의 인식", 한국어교육, 28(1), pp.113~139 (2017), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  6. 제5차 한국어능력시험(TOPIK) 말하기 평가 개발 연구, "원미진", 국립국제교육원, ~ (2018)
  7. 원미진, "한국어 말하기 평가 개발을 위한 채점 경향 분석 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 47, pp.169~192 (2017), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  8. 이영식, "한국어 말하기 시험의 유형 및 채점 기준 설정을 위한 기초 연구", 한국어교육, 15(3), pp.207~228 (2004), 국제한국어교육학회
  9. 이정희, "인식 조사를 통한 한국어 구어 유창성의 개념 및 요인 연구", 한국어교육, 21(4), pp.183~204 (2010), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  10. 이향, "컴퓨터 기반 한국어 말하기 평가에 대한 수험자들의 태도 분석 - 면대면 평가와의 비교를 통한 안면타당도 분석 -", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 45, pp.305~330 (2016), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  11. 지현숙, "한국어 평가론" (2017), 한글파크
  12. 한상미, "컴퓨터 기반 한국어 말하기 숙달도 평가 도구 개발 연구", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 34, pp.519~554 (2009), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  13. Gibson, S., "Reading aloud: A useful learning tool?", ELT Journal, 62(1), pp.29~36 (2008)
  14. Thornbury, "How to teach speaking" (2005), Longman
  15. "ACTFL"[URL]
  16. "IELTS"[URL]
  17. "TOEIC"[URL]
  18. "TOPIK"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)