본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

语法化和类型学视角下的漢语完整体与韩语过去时范畴

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper has sought to use a cross-linguistic approach to analyse and contrast the perfective aspects in Chinese and the past tense in Korean from perspectives of grammaticization and typology. Bybee, Perkins & Pagliuca(1994)'s view and methodology are adopted and combined with aspect theories about situation aspect and viewpoint aspect so that some new observation can be made. It is argued that “-었-” in Korean is not a perfective marker, but a marker of past tense together with a use of anterior so that “-었-” can be assigned a higher perfage stage than Chinese particle “le” whose perfage stage is analysed as “old anterior”. It is proposed that this phenomena is inherently decided by the correspondence between a typology of morphological form and a typology of grammatical meaning. Korean is an agglutinative language whose morphological type supports it to evolve into a tense-prominent language while it is natural for an isolating language like Chinese to evolve into a aspect-prominent language which has developed resultives, completives and an old anterior like “le”, but not those high perfages like perfectives or pasts.

Abstract

This paper has sought to use a cross-linguistic approach to analyse and contrast the perfective aspects in Chinese and the past tense in Korean from perspectives of grammaticization and typology. Bybee, Perkins & Pagliuca(1994)'s view and methodology are adopted and combined with aspect theories about situation aspect and viewpoint aspect so that some new observation can be made. It is argued that “-었-” in Korean is not a perfective marker, but a marker of past tense together with a use of anterior so that “-었-” can be assigned a higher perfage stage than Chinese particle “le” whose perfage stage is analysed as “old anterior”. It is proposed that this phenomena is inherently decided by the correspondence between a typology of morphological form and a typology of grammatical meaning. Korean is an agglutinative language whose morphological type supports it to evolve into a tense-prominent language while it is natural for an isolating language like Chinese to evolve into a aspect-prominent language which has developed resultives, completives and an old anterior like “le”, but not those high perfages like perfectives or pasts.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. 안동환, "Semantics of Korean Tense Markers", 박사, pp.1980
  2. 崔圭钵, "汉韩体标记的比较", 中国语言文字论稿, pp.53~94 (2007), 도서출판 올린책상
  3. 崔圭钵, "汉韩进行体、 持续体对比及其否定", 中国语言文字论稿, pp.95~116 (2007), 도서출판 올린책상
  4. 崔希亮, "事件情态和汉语的表态系统", 语法研究和探索, 12, pp.331~347 (2003), 商务印书馆
  5. 陈平, "论现代汉语时间系统的三元结构", 中国语文, 6, pp.410~430 (1988)
  6. 陈前瑞, "汉语体貌系统研究", 박사, pp.2003
  7. 陈前瑞, "句尾“了”将来时间用法的发展", 语言教学与研究, 1, pp.66~73 (2005)
  8. 陈前瑞, "汉语双“了”句的兴衰及相关的理论问题", 语法研究和探索, 13, pp.32~48 (2006), 商务印书馆
  9. 顾阳, "时态、 时制理论与汉语时间参照研究", 当代语言学理论和汉语研究, pp.97~119 (2008), 商务印书馆
  10. 金立鑫, "“S了”的时体意义及其句法条件", 语言教学与研究, 2 (2003)
  11. 李恩洙, "현대 중국어 상 표지 연구 -‘了’를 중심으로", 박사, 중어중문학과, pp.2003
  12. 이명정, "???生“了”的?得?程考察及初中??段?學?策", 중국어문학논집, (47), pp.267~293 (2007), 중국어문학연구회
  13. 이명정, "試論“了”产生的历史时代及其初期語法化", 중국어문학논집, (53), pp.115~140 (2008), 중국어문학연구회
  14. 刘勋宁, "现代汉语句尾‘了’的来源", 方言, 2 (1985)
  15. 刘勋宁, "现代汉语句尾“了”的语法意义及其解说", 世界汉语教学, 3 (2002)
  16. 梅广, "汉语跟表达时有关的几个句法范畴 in: 梅广 교수 초청강연회 참고 논문 자료집" (2007), 고려대학교 BK21 중⋅일 언어문화 교육연구단
  17. 梅广, "解析藏缅语的功能范畴体系--以羌语为例 in: 梅广 교수 초청강연회 참고 논문 자료집" (2007), 고려대학교 BK21 중⋅일 언어문화 교육연구단
  18. 南基心, "现代国语 时制에 관한 연구", 국어국문학, pp.55~57 (1972)
  19. 潘维桂, "≪敦煌变文集≫和≪景德传灯录≫中的‘了’的用法", 语言论集, 1 (1980), 中国人民大学出版社
  20. 石鋟, "浅谈助词‘了’语法化过程中的几个问题", 汉语史研究集刊, 2 (2000)
  21. 唐正大, "从独立动词到话题标记---‘起来’语法化模式的理据性", 语法化与语法研究, 2, pp.252~266 (2005), 商务印书馆
  22. 吴福祥, "语法化演变的共相与殊相", 语法化与语法研究, 2, pp.267~306 (2005), 商务印书馆
  23. 吴福祥, "汉语体标记“了、 着”为什么不能强制性使用", 当代语言学, 3, pp.237~250 (2005)
  24. 武果, "语气词“了”的“主观性”用法", 语言学论丛, 36 (2007), 商务印书馆
  25. Bybee, J.L., "On the nature of grammatical categories: a diachronic perspective", On the nature of grammatical categories: a diachronic perspective, 2, pp.17~34 (1986)
  26. Bybee, J.L., "Semantic aspects of morphological typology in : Essays on Language Function and Language Type" (1997), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  27. Bybee, J.L., "The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world", Studies in Language, 13, pp.51~103 (1989)
  28. Willett, Thomas, "A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evident-iality", Studies in Language, 12(1), pp.51~97 (1988)
  29. 曹广顺, "近代汉语助词" (1995), 语文出版社
  30. 戴耀晶, "汉语时体系统研究" (1997), 浙江教育出版社
  31. 房玉清, "实用汉语语法(修订本)" (2001), 北京大学出版社
  32. 高永根, "한국어의 시제 서법 동작상" (2004), 태학사
  33. 龚千炎, "汉语的时相时制时态" (1995), 商务印书馆
  34. 蒋绍愚, "近代汉语研究概要" (2005), 北京大学出版社
  35. 蒋绍愚, "近代汉语语法史研究综述" (2005), 商务印书馆
  36. 이재성, "한국어의 시제와 상" (2001), 국학자료원
  37. 刘勋宁, "现代汉语研究" (1998), 北京语言大学出版社
  38. 南基心, "국어문법의 시제문제에 관한 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
  39. 孙英杰, "现代汉语体系统研究" (2007), 黑龙江人民出版社
  40. 太田辰夫, "中国语历史文法" (1987), 北京大学出版社
  41. 王力, "汉语史稿" (1958), 科学出版社
  42. 조오현, "새로 쓰는 국어학 개론" (2008), 소통
  43. 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
  44. Bhat, D.N.S., "The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  45. Brinton, L.J., "The Development of English Aspectual Systems" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  46. Bybee, J., "The Evolution of Grammar : Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
  47. Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
  48. Comrie, B., "Tense" (1985), Cambridge University Press
  49. Dahl, Ő., "Tense and Aspect Systems" (1985), Basil Blackwell Ltd.
  50. Dik, S.C., "The Theory of Functional Grammar" (1997), Mouton de Gruyter
  51. Givón, T., "Syntax" (1984), John Benjamins
  52. Hawking, S.W., "A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes" (1988), Bantam Books
  53. Li & Thompson, "Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
  54. Michaelis, L.A., "Aspectual Grammar and Past-time Reference" (1998), Routledge
  55. Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  56. Ramstedt, G.J., "阿尔泰语言学导论" (2004), 内蒙古教育出版社
  57. Sapir, E., "Language" (1921), Harcourt Brace
  58. Smith, C.S., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  59. Smith, C.S., "The Parameter of Aspect(Second Edition)" (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  60. Xiao, R., "Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)