한국 RE100 제도에서 녹색프리미엄의 특성 및 한계
Characteristics and Limitations of Green Premium in the Korean RE100 System
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The green premium is the most important feature of Korea’s RE100 system. Green premium has three characteristics. The first, the cost of implementation is lower than that of other means of implementation. The second, it is linked with the RPS system to keep the means of implementing the green premium low. Third, the funds raised by the green premium are used to supply renewable energy to compensate for the additionality that the green premium does not have. When the entire industrial sector’s electricity consumption is converted to renewable energy, the implementation cost of the green premium is estimated to be 3,377.4 billion won, and the REC purchase is estimated to incur the implementation cost of 6,576.4 billion won, which is 3.5 trillion more than the green premium. It was analyzed that an additional implementation cost of KRW 100 million would occur. In addition, in the case of solar PPA, it was analyzed that additional implementation costs of KRW 13,375.7 billion to KRW 16,162.3 billion were incurred. It was estimated that the renewable energy that could be supplied to the green premium would at least be sufficient for companies exporting to the US and EU. In addition, it was analyzed that when the fund created as a green premium is used for renewable energy supply, about 30.7% of the renewable energy supply through PPA can be supplied. However, as ESG is emphasized, green premium can be criticized by green washing because there is no additionality. There is also a limit to responding to the EU’s CBAM. Therefore, companies can use the green premium depending on the situation, but it is more advantageous to use PPA, etc. The government needs to sufficiently maintain the supply of renewable energy using the fund to maintain the green premium.
Abstract
The green premium is the most important feature of Korea’s RE100 system. Green premium has three characteristics. The first, the cost of implementation is lower than that of other means of implementation. The second, it is linked with the RPS system to keep the means of implementing the green premium low. Third, the funds raised by the green premium are used to supply renewable energy to compensate for the additionality that the green premium does not have. When the entire industrial sector’s electricity consumption is converted to renewable energy, the implementation cost of the green premium is estimated to be 3,377.4 billion won, and the REC purchase is estimated to incur the implementation cost of 6,576.4 billion won, which is 3.5 trillion more than the green premium. It was analyzed that an additional implementation cost of KRW 100 million would occur. In addition, in the case of solar PPA, it was analyzed that additional implementation costs of KRW 13,375.7 billion to KRW 16,162.3 billion were incurred. It was estimated that the renewable energy that could be supplied to the green premium would at least be sufficient for companies exporting to the US and EU. In addition, it was analyzed that when the fund created as a green premium is used for renewable energy supply, about 30.7% of the renewable energy supply through PPA can be supplied. However, as ESG is emphasized, green premium can be criticized by green washing because there is no additionality. There is also a limit to responding to the EU’s CBAM. Therefore, companies can use the green premium depending on the situation, but it is more advantageous to use PPA, etc. The government needs to sufficiently maintain the supply of renewable energy using the fund to maintain the green premium.
참고문헌 (27)
- Stepping Up: RE100 gathers speed in challenging markets, "CDP", CDP, ~ (2022)
- Kim, S. J., "Transition to renewable energy promised by global companies, RE100", POSCO Research Institute, 1~13 (2018)
- 이예지, "RE100의 현황과 우리나라에서의 시사점", 에너지기후변화학회지, 14(1), pp.43~52 (2019), 한국에너지기후변화학회[DOI]
- 이예지, "재생에너지 이용의 변화와 RE100 현황", 에너지기후변화학회지, 14(2), pp.65~73 (2019), 한국에너지기후변화학회[DOI]
- Kim, S. W., "RE100 and the new future of the Korean electric power industry", Electric Journal, pp.27~31 (2019)
- Moon, P. J., "Implementation plans linking the current status of the RE100 campaign and carbon credits", Bulletin of the Korea Photovoltaic Society, 6(2), pp.34~41 (2020)
- Ju, M. H., "A study on the development of renewable energy supply in Korea through RE100 cases", Proceedings of KIIT Conference, pp.642~647 (2020)
- Park, D. K., "A study on comparison and improvement of RE100 system", Proc. The Korean Society of Electrical Engineers Spring Conference, pp.264~265 (2021)
- 신훈영, "국내외 RE100 운영현황 분석 및 국내 RE100 활성화를 위한 방안", 전기학회논문지, 70(11), pp.1645~1654 (2021), 대한전기학회
- 이재협, "분산전원 활성화를 위한 법제도의 정비 ― RE100 캠페인과 전력구매계약(PPA)을 중심으로 ―", 환경법연구, 43(3), pp.207~241 (2021), 한국환경법학회
- 안상효, "국내 RE100 이행방안의 경제성 비교분석 연구", Current Photovoltaic Research, 10(2), pp.62~71 (2022), 한국태양광발전학회[DOI]
- Noh, W.J., "Microeconomic Theory" (2016), Oxford University Press
- "RE100 operation"[URL]
- "Green Premium Bidding Results" (2021)[URL]
- "Green Premium Bidding Results" (2022)[URL]
- "One year of implementation of the Korean (K) RE100 system, performance and implications" (2022)[URL]
- Today Energy, "KEPCO-Hyundai Elevator Signs First Third-Party Electricity Transaction Contract", ~ (2022)
- "KEPCO Statistics (No. 90)" (2021)[URL]
- "Import and export trends in 2021" (2022)[URL]
- "Announcement of Mandatory Supply Amount by Persons Obligated to Supply in 2021" (2021)[URL]
- "Corporate RE100, green premium, limited to third-party PPA… ‘Direct PPA’ must be activated", Energy Daily, ~ (2021)
- Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Annex 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Renewable Energy Act", ~ (2022)
- "The 5th basic plan for renewable energy (2020-2034)" (2021)[URL]
- "Global greenwashing cases and reinforcement of regulations" (2022)[URL]
- Evaluation and implications of amendments to the carbon boundary adjustment system of the EU parliament, "Shin, G.S.", KITA, ~, pp.KITA Trade Report 4 (2022)
- "9th Basic plan for electricity supply and demand" (2020)[URL]