국내 태양광 발전 보조금 제도의 정책 효과: 공급의무화제도 사례를 중심으로
The Policy Impact of Renewable Energy Subsidies on Solar PV: The Case of Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 2012, Korea introduced a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) scheme, replacing the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme as a market support policy of renewable energy in the electricity market. RPS is to allocate obligatory quota of renewable energy sources for electricity suppliers, whereas FIT is to guarantee high prices for electricity from renewable energy sources. This study examines the effect of this policy change on solar photovoltaic market. According to the study, solar PV market grew fast under FIT as well as under RPS. However, under RPS the size of subsidy for solar PV suppliers was shrunk substantially. In addition, market risk increased severly under RPS due to the volatility of price of renewable energy certificate (REC) as well as of the electricity market price. The small and medium suppliers of solar PV were suffered the most severly from these policy effects. Therefore, the policy reform of RPS is needed to alleviate the market risk of small and medium suppliers of solar PV.
Abstract
In 2012, Korea introduced a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) scheme, replacing the Feed-in Tariff (FIT) scheme as a market support policy of renewable energy in the electricity market. RPS is to allocate obligatory quota of renewable energy sources for electricity suppliers, whereas FIT is to guarantee high prices for electricity from renewable energy sources. This study examines the effect of this policy change on solar photovoltaic market. According to the study, solar PV market grew fast under FIT as well as under RPS. However, under RPS the size of subsidy for solar PV suppliers was shrunk substantially. In addition, market risk increased severly under RPS due to the volatility of price of renewable energy certificate (REC) as well as of the electricity market price. The small and medium suppliers of solar PV were suffered the most severly from these policy effects. Therefore, the policy reform of RPS is needed to alleviate the market risk of small and medium suppliers of solar PV.
참고문헌 (12)
- "Electimes", ~ (2016)
- Menanteau, P., "Prices Versus Quantities: Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy", Energy Policy, 31, pp.799~812 (2003)
- Haas, R., "A Historical Review of Promotion Strategies for Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources in EU Countries", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp.1003~1034 (2011)
- 권태형, "신재생에너지 지원 정책과 지대추구: 국내 발전차액지원제도와 공급의무화제도 사례", 행정논총, 53(2), pp.295~314 (2015), 한국행정연구소
- 김준희, "RPS제도 시행에 따른 의무이행 현황 분석 및 개선방안연구", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 33(6), pp.98~104 (2013), 한국태양에너지학회
- Response Strategies of Seoul for the Introduction of Renewable Portfolio Standard, "Jin, S. H.", Seoul Development Institution, ~ (2009)
- 이수철, "한국의 신재생에너지전력 지원정책 －EU와 일본의 제도 비교분석을 통한 지원정책의 현상과 과제－", 환경정책연구, 7(4), pp.1~34 (2008), 한국환경정책·평가연구원
- LCOE and Potentials of Renewable Energy in Korea, "Lee, C. H.", Korea Environment Institute, ~ (2014)
- Kwon, T., "Rent and Rent-seeking in Renewable Energy Support Policies: Feed-in Tariff vs. Renewable Portfolio Standard", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, pp.676~681 (2015)
- 선우석호, "REC가격변동이 태양광투자에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증분석", 신재생에너지, 12(3), pp.156~164 (2016), 한국신·재생에너지학회
- 최재호, "RPS제도가 PF방식 LNG복합발전프로젝트의 사업성에 미치는 영향", 신재생에너지, 11(1), pp.27~35 (2015), 한국신·재생에너지학회
- "Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century"[URL]