일제말기 김남천 문학과 만주- 미지와 공백의 기표
Namcheon Kim and Manchuria in the late Japanese Imperialism
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article scrutinizes the works of Namcheon Kim in the late Japanese Imperialism mainly focusing on their relationships with ‘Manchuria.’ Japanese Imperialism tries to reinforce its dominant power by suggesting Manchuria as an ideological supplement. Considering the importance of Manchuria with regard to the dominant ideology of Japanese Imperialism, the figure of Manchuria in the literary works is an essential key for evaluation. In the works of Namcheon Kim, Manchuria is shown as a ‘void.’ He presents colonied Korea as a space of corrupted conscious and distorted personality. In this sense, Manchuria could be a new fantasy irrelevant to national degradation. However, he resists against the Imperialist dominant ideology by denying describing Manchuria as a concrete and positive space. Manchuria as a void signifier means cease of judgement, which signifies his cognitive distance from the dominant ideology. For void Manchuria means hollowness of dominant ideology that leads to the revelation of falsehood in the logic of New Order of East Asia. What remains as a limit in his works is that he cannot link colonial capitalism to imperialism by its natural consequence.
Abstract
This article scrutinizes the works of Namcheon Kim in the late Japanese Imperialism mainly focusing on their relationships with ‘Manchuria.’ Japanese Imperialism tries to reinforce its dominant power by suggesting Manchuria as an ideological supplement. Considering the importance of Manchuria with regard to the dominant ideology of Japanese Imperialism, the figure of Manchuria in the literary works is an essential key for evaluation. In the works of Namcheon Kim, Manchuria is shown as a ‘void.’ He presents colonied Korea as a space of corrupted conscious and distorted personality. In this sense, Manchuria could be a new fantasy irrelevant to national degradation. However, he resists against the Imperialist dominant ideology by denying describing Manchuria as a concrete and positive space. Manchuria as a void signifier means cease of judgement, which signifies his cognitive distance from the dominant ideology. For void Manchuria means hollowness of dominant ideology that leads to the revelation of falsehood in the logic of New Order of East Asia. What remains as a limit in his works is that he cannot link colonial capitalism to imperialism by its natural consequence.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김남천, "소설의 장래와 인간성 문제" (1941), 춘추
- 김남천, "전환기와 작가" (1941), 조광
- 김남천, "사랑의 수족관, 조선일보 1939.8.1-1040.3.3", ~
- 공임순, "식민지 시대 소설에 나타난 사회주의자의 형상 연구-김남천 소설을 중심으로", 한국근대문학연구, 7(13), pp.197~224 (2006), 한국근대문학회
- 곽승미, "김남천 문학연구-인식적.미학적 원리로서의 근대성", 박사, pp.2000
- 김외곤, "한국근대 리얼리즘문학 비판" (1995), 태학사
- 김재용, "일제말 한국인의 만주인식, 일제말기 문인들의 만주체험", pp.13~42 (2007), 역락
- 김재용, "협력과 저항" (2004), 소명출판
- 김철, ", ‘국민’이라는 노예", pp.62~104 (2005), 삼인
- 서영인, "근대인간의 초극과 리얼리즘", 국어국문학, (137), pp.457~483 (2004)
- 서영인, "김남천의 신체제 인식과 우회적 글쓰기, 탈식민주의를 넘어서", pp.171~191 (2006), 소명출판
- 신규섭, "만주국의 치외법권철폐와 재만 조선인에 대한 인식", 대동문화연구, 43, pp.67~85 (2003), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
- 와다 도모미, "김남천의 취재원에 대한 일고찰", 관악어문연구, 23, pp.213~240 (1998), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 윤대석, "1940년대 ‘국민문학’ 연구", 박사, pp.2006
- 윤휘탁, "만주국의 이등국(공)민, 그 실상과 허상", 역사학보, 169, pp.139~171 (2003), 역사학회
- 이경훈, "만주와 친일 로맨티시즘, 오빠의 탄생", pp.271~297 (2003), 문학과 지성사
- 이수형, "김남천 문학연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 이철호, "동양, 제국, 식민주체의 신생-1930년대 후반 김남천과 김사량 소설을 중심으로", 한국문학연구, 26, pp.297~316 (2003), 동국대학교 한국문학연구소
- 정종현, "식민지 후반기(1937-1945)한국문학에 나타난 동양론 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 차승기, "임화와 김남천, 또는 “세태”와 “풍속”의 거리-1930년대 후반 “전환기”의 문학적 대응들", 현대문학의 연구, (25), pp.83~117 (2005), 한국문학연구학회
- 최혜림, "사랑의 수족관에 나타난 ‘일상성’의 의미 고찰", 민족문학사연구, (25), pp.243~269 (2004), 민족문학사학회
- 한수영, "이태준과 신체제, 친일문학의 재인식", pp.17~51 (2005), 소명출판
- 슬라보예 지젝, "환상의 돌림병" (2002), 인간사랑
- Slavoj iek, "Interrogating the Real" (2005), Continuum