형광유리 선량계와 광자극 발광선량계를 이용한 핵의학과 선량 측정비교
Comparison on the Dosimetry of OSLD and PLD Used in Nuclear Medicine
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was conducted from July 1 to September 30, 2018 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter(OSLD) and photoluminescent glass dosimeter(PLD) to measure the 3-month exposure dose and the cumulative dose in the active working area of the nuclear medicine worker Respectively. As a result, the cumulative dose for three months in the worker and work area was measured as 1.97 mSv and 2.02 mSv in the PLD. The mean surface dose and the mean depth dose of the OSLD were measured to be 2.04 mSv. The difference in the total surface dose measured by the PLD and the OSLD was 0.66mSv and the total mean surface dose was 0.07mSv. The difference between the total depth dose and the total depth dose was 0.1mSv and 0.02mSv, respectively. It was found that the dose value of the OSLD was higher than that of the PLD. In addition, it was found that the maximum difference of 0.01mSv was observed between the PLD and the OSLD of the worker. For the dose measurement of the two dosimetry systems, there was no significant difference between the PLD and the OSLD in the surface dose of 0.239 (p>0.05). Also, the significance of PLD and OSLD in the deep dose was 0.109, which was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Abstract
This study was conducted from July 1 to September 30, 2018 using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter(OSLD) and photoluminescent glass dosimeter(PLD) to measure the 3-month exposure dose and the cumulative dose in the active working area of the nuclear medicine worker Respectively. As a result, the cumulative dose for three months in the worker and work area was measured as 1.97 mSv and 2.02 mSv in the PLD. The mean surface dose and the mean depth dose of the OSLD were measured to be 2.04 mSv. The difference in the total surface dose measured by the PLD and the OSLD was 0.66mSv and the total mean surface dose was 0.07mSv. The difference between the total depth dose and the total depth dose was 0.1mSv and 0.02mSv, respectively. It was found that the dose value of the OSLD was higher than that of the PLD. In addition, it was found that the maximum difference of 0.01mSv was observed between the PLD and the OSLD of the worker. For the dose measurement of the two dosimetry systems, there was no significant difference between the PLD and the OSLD in the surface dose of 0.239 (p>0.05). Also, the significance of PLD and OSLD in the deep dose was 0.109, which was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
참고문헌 (18)
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, , NCRP, ~, pp.No.93 (1988)
- ICRP, "Recommendation of the International Commission on Rediological Protection" (1997), ICRP Publication 26 Pergamon Press
- Han SK, "Comparison of air dose rates and personal exposure doses in the nuclear medicine department", The 43rd Conference on Radiation Radiology, pp.446~ (2008)
- Park MH, "Radiometry", Nationwide Culture History, pp.323~368 (2017)
- Personal exposure dosimetry for dosimetry Quality control, "Jin KH", Korea Food & Drug Administration, ~ (2007)
- Son KH, "High dose linearity, cumulative dose, energy dependence of glass dosimeter", Korea Radiation Protection Society (2009)
- Kang BS, "Radiation detection ＆ Measurement" (2012), Chung-gu publishing
- Jursinic PA, "Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements", Med. Phys, 34(12), pp.4594~4604 (2007)
- 임인철, "광자극발광선량계(OLSDs)를 이용한 직장암 방사선치료 환자의 피부선량 측정", 방사선방어학회지, 36(2), pp.86~92 (2011), 테스트학회
- 이왕희, "광자극발광선량계와 열형광선량계를 이용한 핵의학과 선량 측정비교", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 12(12), pp.329~334 (2012), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 문영민, "유리선량계를 이용한 CBCT의 유효선량 측정에 관한 연구", 석사, 물리학과, pp.2013
- Jursinic PA, "Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs for clinical dosimetric measurements", Med. Phys, 34(12), pp.4594~4604 (2007)
- Jursinic PA, "Changes in optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) dosimetric characteristics with accumulated dose", Med. Phys, 37(1), pp.132~140 (2010)
- Hwang JH, "Study on the Characteristic and Correction Factor Calculation of Optically stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter Using Co⁶⁰ gamma-ray", master's, pp.2016
- 이주아, "전립선암 방사선치료 시 광자극발광선량계를 이용한 광중성자선량 평가", 방사선기술과학, 37(2), pp.125~134 (2014), 대한방사선과학회
- Characteristics of fluorescent glass dosimeter (PLD) in diagnostic area, "Park JG", Daegu Health College, 36~ (2016)
- 권대철, "엑스선의 조사시간에 따른 형광유리선량계의 빌드업 특성", 의공학회지, 38(5), pp.256~263 (2017), 대한의용생체공학회
- 손진현, "Piranha 657의 Internal Detector를 이용한 저에너지에서 유리선량계의 선량 특성에 관한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 35(2), pp.119~124 (2012), 대한방사선과학회[DOI]