본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

다중채널코일과 병렬영상기법 이용 시 두영역측정법을 사용한 신호대잡음비 측정의 문제점

A study on Evaluating Validity of SNR Calculation Using a Conventional Two Region Method in MR Images Applied a Multichannel Coil and Parallel Imaging Technique

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

본 연구는 다중채널코일과 병렬영상기법 이용 시 관행적으로 사용하고 있는 두영역측정법을 사용한 신호대잡음비 측정의 문제점을 알아보고자 하였다. 두영역측정법 사용 시 3가지 전제 조건에 만족하는 단일채널구상코일을 이용한 기준 SNR을 산출한 후, 다중채널코일과 병렬영상기법 이용 시 공신력 있는 기관에서 권고하는 방법과 전제 조건을 고려하지 않고 사용되어 문제가 되는 두영역측정법을 사용하여 SNR을 산출한 후 비교하였다. 다중채널코일과 병렬영상기법 이용 한 두영역측정법이 가장 높은 상대표준편차를 보여 낮은 정밀도를 나타내었고, ROI 위치에 따른 SNR 차이도 매우 높아 공간적으로 잡음의 분포가 균일하지 않음을 알 수 있었다. Blend-Altman plot 통한 95% 신뢰구간 간격도 가장 넓어 기준이 되는 단일채널구상코일을 이용한 두영역측정법 대비 일치도가 낮음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 동일한 영상획득조건에서 자기공명영상장치 성능평가 시험의 표준이 되는 AAPM 방법과, 신호 영역 내에서 잡음 레벨을 정확히 결정할 수 있는 NEMA 방법, 그리고 자기공명영상장치의 제조사가 권고하는 방법을 직접적으로 비교함으로써, 연구자들이 간과할 수 있는 전제조건을 만족하지 않는 다중채널코일과 병렬영상기법 이용 시, 두영역측정법을 사용한 신호대잡음비의 부정확한 문제점을 정량적으로 증명하였다는데 큰 의의가 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the problems of a signal to noise ratio measurement using a two region measurement method that is conventionally used when using a multi-channel coil and a par-allel imaging technique. As a research method, after calculating the standard SNR using a single channel head coil of which coil satisfies three preconditions when using a two region measurement method, we made comparisons and evaluations after calculating an SNR by using a two region measurement method of which method is problematic because it is used without considering the methods recommended by rep-utable organizations and the preconditions at the time of using a multi-channel coil and a parallel imaging technique. We found that a two region measurement method using a multi-channel coil and a parallel imaging technique shows the highest relative standard deviation, and thus shows a low degree of precision. In addition, we found out that the difference of SNR according to ROI location was very high, and thus a spatial noise distribution was not uniform. Also, 95% confidence interval through Blend-Altman plot is the widest, and thus the conformity degree with a two region measurement method using the standard single channel head coil is low. By directly comparing an AAPM method, which serves as a standard of a performance evaluation test of a magnetic resonance imaging device under the same image acquisitionconditions, an NEMA method which can accuratelydetermine the noise level in a signal region and the methods recommended by manufacturers of a magnetic resonance imaging device, there is a sig-nificance in that we quantitatively verified the inaccurate problems of a signal to noise ratio using a two region measurement method when using a multi-channel coil and a parallel imaging technique of which method does not satisfy the preconditions that researchers could overlook.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Firbank M, "A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images", Physics in medicine and biology, 44(12), pp.N261~ (1999)
  2. 배성진, "3T MR 스핀에코 T1강조영상에서 적정의 숙임각", 방사선기술과학, 32(2), pp.177~182 (2009), 대한방사선과학회
  3. Kaufman L, "Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging", Radiology, 173(1), pp.265~267 (1989)
  4. Dietrich O, "Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters", Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 26(2), pp.375~385 (2007)
  5. Robson PM, "Comprehensive quantification of signal‐to‐noise ratio and g‐factor for image‐based and k space‐based parallel imaging reconstructions", Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 60(4), pp.895~907 (2008)
  6. Murphy B, "Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers", Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 11(3), pp.425~428 (1993)
  7. Goerner FL, "Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI", Medical physics, 38(9), pp.5049~5057 (2011)
  8. Gudbjartsson H, "The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data", Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34(6), pp.910~914 (1995)
  9. Steckner MC, "A new single acquisition;two-image difference method for determining MR image SNR", Medical physics, 36(2), pp.662~671 (2009)
  10. Deshmane A, "Parallel MR imaging", Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 36(1), pp.55~72 (2012)
  11. Sodickson DK, "Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH); fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays", Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 38(4), pp.591~603 (1997)
  12. Pruessmann KP, "SENSE; sensitivity encoding for fast MRI", Magnetic resonance in medicine, 42(5), pp.952~962 (1999)
  13. Kellman P, "Image reconstruction in SNR units; A general method for SNR measurement", Magnetic resonance in medicine, 54(6), pp.1439~1447 (2005)
  14. Acceptance Testing and Quality Assurance Procedures for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facilities, "Medicine AAoPi", AAPM, ~, pp.AAPM Report, No100 (2010)
  15. Association NEM, "Determination of signal-to-noise ratio(SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging" (2008)
  16. Larsson EG, "SNR-optimality of sum-of-squares reconstruction for phased-array magnetic resonance imaging", Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 163(1), pp.121~123 (2003)
  17. Wiens CN, "Computationally rapid method of estimating signal-to-noise ratio for phased array image reconstructions", Magnetic resonance in medicine :official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66(4), pp.1192~1197 (2011)
  18. Imai H, "Signal-to-noise ratio measurement in parallel MRI with subtraction mapping and consecutive methods", Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 64(8), pp.930~936 (2008)
  19. No.1 ATG : Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging; Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No.1, , ~ (1989)
  20. Steckner MC, "A simple method for estimating the noise level in a signal region of an MR image", Med Phys, 37(9), pp.5072~5079 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)