Port-City and Local Population Relationship: the Perception of Busan Citizens of the Port
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ports play a key role in international trade, as integral hubs where passengers and cargoes are loaded, discharged, and transshipped. However, the function of ports is becoming more diversified, expanding on roles as industrial clusters, as well as logistical centers. Such roles combined, reap numerous and significant benefits, mainly with growth of jobs and wealth creation, for the local population living in the city, and beyond. Citizens’ awareness of the function and value of ports may not be positive, because of a range of negative factors such as emissions, noise, and road congestion, which can influence their perception. This study’s contribution focuses on empirically evaluating the perception of Busan citizens of the local port, by applying Q methodology. The links connecting the port-city and local population, are assessed by identifying: 1) The level of awareness of the Busan citizens of the port; 2) Factors perceived as positive as well as factors perceived as negative by Busan citizens. There are four main factors, derived from the analysis: 1) Port functional knowledge; 2) Lack of social connectedness port-city; 3) Environmentally concerned and; 4) Absent port’s ripple’s effect. Policy recommendations suggest focusing on improving citizens’ perception of the port, for each of the four main factors derived from the analysis.
Abstract
Ports play a key role in international trade, as integral hubs where passengers and cargoes are loaded, discharged, and transshipped. However, the function of ports is becoming more diversified, expanding on roles as industrial clusters, as well as logistical centers. Such roles combined, reap numerous and significant benefits, mainly with growth of jobs and wealth creation, for the local population living in the city, and beyond. Citizens’ awareness of the function and value of ports may not be positive, because of a range of negative factors such as emissions, noise, and road congestion, which can influence their perception. This study’s contribution focuses on empirically evaluating the perception of Busan citizens of the local port, by applying Q methodology. The links connecting the port-city and local population, are assessed by identifying: 1) The level of awareness of the Busan citizens of the port; 2) Factors perceived as positive as well as factors perceived as negative by Busan citizens. There are four main factors, derived from the analysis: 1) Port functional knowledge; 2) Lack of social connectedness port-city; 3) Environmentally concerned and; 4) Absent port’s ripple’s effect. Policy recommendations suggest focusing on improving citizens’ perception of the port, for each of the four main factors derived from the analysis.
참고문헌 (43)
- Allen, J, "Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form", Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp.45~57 (2012)
- Alsina-Pages, "Survey of Environmental Noise in the Port of Barcelona", Euronoise Conference Paper (2018)
- Baker, R, "Q Methodology in Health Economics", Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11(1), pp.38~45 (2006)
- Brown, S. R, "Q Methodoology and Qualitative Research", Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), pp.561~567 (1996)
- De Borger, B, "Port Activities, Hinterland Congestion, and Optimal Government Policies", Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 45(2), pp.247~275 (2011)
- Demirovic, D, "Environmental and Community Stability of a Mountain Destination: An Analysis of Residents’ Perception", Sustainability, 10(1), pp.70~ (2017)
- De Tran, V, , Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 17(11), pp.2281~2289 (2018)
- Ducruet, C, "Frontline soldiers of globalisation: port-city evolution and regional competition", Geojournal, 67(2), pp.107~122 (2006)
- Dragan, "Deterioration of the life quality of the Koper's inhabitants as a result of the Port's ships' activities: The SEM Modeling Study Of Social Irresponsibility", 3th IRDO International Scientific Conference of Social Responsibility and Current Challenges 2018: Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development In Science, Education and Business (2018)
- "Economic Impact Study Of Sydney’s Port 2001/2002. A report prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation" (2003)[URL]
- ESPO, "ESPO Port Performance Dashboard", European Sea Ports Organisation, ~ (2013)
- Ferrari, C, "Port and Local Development: Evidence from Italy", International Journal of Transport Economics, 37(1), pp.9~30 (2010)
- Grover, V, "Q Methodology: An Objective Technique For Handling Subjective Issues In Educational Research", Review of Research Journal, 2(12), pp.1~5 (2013)
- Hughes, M, "Researching behavior: A Q methodological exploration of the position of the young person as researcher", Phd, pp.2012
- Economic Impact of Port of Prince Rupert, Final Report, "InterVistas", ~ (2017)
- Study Of Emission Control And Energy Efficiency Measures For Ships In The Port Area, "IMO", ~ (2015)
- InterVistas, "Port of Vancouver 2016 Economic Impact", Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, ~ (2017)
- Kim, J. Y, "Port User Typology and representations of Port Choice Behavior: A Q-Methodological Study", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 16(2), pp.165~187 (2014)
- Kitzinger, C, "The social construction of lesbianism Vol. 1" (1987), Sage Publications
- Lee, J. H, "Conflict mapping toward ecotourism facility foundation using spatial Q methodology", Tourism Management, 72, pp.69~77 (2019)
- "One Hundred Ports" (2018)[URL]
- Martin Associates, "The local and regional economic impacts of the US deepwater port system 2006" (2007), American Association of Port Authorities
- Martin Associates, "Economic impacts of the port of Los Angeles", Port of Los Angeles, ~ (2007)
- Martin Associates, "Economic Impacts of the Port of Toronto", Port of Toronto, ~ (2018)
- McHugh, N, "Who knows best? A Q methodology study to explore perspectives of professional stakeholders and community participants on health in low-income communities", BMC Health Services Research, 19(1) (2019)
- Merk, O, "The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: The Case of the Seine Axis (Le Havre, Rouen, Paris, Caen)" (2011), OECD
- The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, "Merk, O", OECD Publishing, ~, pp.2013 (2013), 13
- Merk, O, "Shipping Emissions in Ports", International Transport Forum (2014), OECD Publishing
- "Annual Report 2015 of Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore" (2015)[URL]
- Economic importance of the Belgian ports: Flemish maritime ports, Liège port complex and the port of Brussels, Report 2013, "National Bank of Belgium", ~, pp.Working Paper No. 283 (2015)
- "National Statistical Office of the Republic of Korea" (2018)[URL]
- Sustainable Port, Sustainability Report of the Gothenburg Port Authority 2017, "Port of Gothenburg", ~ (2017)
- "Port of Los Angeles" (2019)[URL]
- "Reducing Air Emissions in the Port of Rotterdam (PoR)”" (2012)[URL]
- Previte, J, "Q methodology and rural research", Sociologia Ruralis, 47(2), pp.135~147 (2007)
- Sanchez-Beaskoetxea,L, "Media Image of Seafarers in the Spanish Printed Press", Maritime Policy & Management, 42(2), pp.97~110 (2015)
- Schenone, C, "Noise Pollution Management In Ports: A Brief Review And The EU MESP Project Experience", The 21st International Congresson Sound and Vibration Conference Paper (2014)
- Simons, J, "An introduction to Q methodology", Nurse Researcher, 20(3), pp.2~32 (2013)
- Stephen, T. D, "Q-methodology in communication science: An introduction", Communication Quarterly, 33(3), pp.193~208 (1985)
- Stephenson, W, "The inverted factor technique", British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 26(4), pp.344~361 (1936)
- Stergiou, D, "Q-methodology and Tourism Research", Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), pp.311~322 (2011)
- "Port Authority of New York and New Jersey" (2019)[URL]
- Valenta, A. L, "Q-Methodology: Definition And Application In Health Care Informatics", Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(6), pp.501~510 (1997)