Measurement of Port Service Quality in Container Transport Logistics Using Importance –Performance Analysis: A Case of Busan Port
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to propose an assessment tool of port service quality (PSQ) in the context of container transport logistics (CTLs), by taking the perspectives from port users. The CTLs defined in this study are the relevant activities of serving the physical flows of a container box from a point of origin via a container port to a point of destination. To address the ports’ role in collaboration between its channel members in CTLs, the PSQ measures for all port user groups (i.e. common PSQ measures) are selected based on the relevant CTLs activities involved by port, and its users within terminal/port area as well as throughout the CTLs chain. An importance-performance analysis (IPA) is applied as a diagnostic tool to analyse the status quo of Busan Port in CTLs contexts, by comparing the importance and performance (IP) scores against each individual CTLs criterion. The findings from the IPA reveal that port managers and policy makers at the Busan Port should concentrate on six PSQ measures (i.e. SR1, SR4, ITS1, VAS1, VAS4, ICI3) to enhance PSQ in CTLs. However, four measures (i.e. ITS2, ITS3, ITS4, VAS2) are identified as a possible overkill, indicating an area of inefficiency where a remedial action of the cost-cutting decision is necessary. On the other hand, the Busan port shows an outstanding performance on four measures such as SR2, SR3, ICI1 and ICI2. The measures are not only important but also high performance. The study findings provide managerial guidance to port managers in Busan Port, in view of searching for managerial and operational strategies for sustainable port growth.
Abstract
This study aims to propose an assessment tool of port service quality (PSQ) in the context of container transport logistics (CTLs), by taking the perspectives from port users. The CTLs defined in this study are the relevant activities of serving the physical flows of a container box from a point of origin via a container port to a point of destination. To address the ports’ role in collaboration between its channel members in CTLs, the PSQ measures for all port user groups (i.e. common PSQ measures) are selected based on the relevant CTLs activities involved by port, and its users within terminal/port area as well as throughout the CTLs chain. An importance-performance analysis (IPA) is applied as a diagnostic tool to analyse the status quo of Busan Port in CTLs contexts, by comparing the importance and performance (IP) scores against each individual CTLs criterion. The findings from the IPA reveal that port managers and policy makers at the Busan Port should concentrate on six PSQ measures (i.e. SR1, SR4, ITS1, VAS1, VAS4, ICI3) to enhance PSQ in CTLs. However, four measures (i.e. ITS2, ITS3, ITS4, VAS2) are identified as a possible overkill, indicating an area of inefficiency where a remedial action of the cost-cutting decision is necessary. On the other hand, the Busan port shows an outstanding performance on four measures such as SR2, SR3, ICI1 and ICI2. The measures are not only important but also high performance. The study findings provide managerial guidance to port managers in Busan Port, in view of searching for managerial and operational strategies for sustainable port growth.
참고문헌 (15)
- Abalo, J., "Importance values for Importance–Performance Analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings", Journal of Business Research, 60(2), pp.115~121 (2007)
- Brooks, M. R., "Issues in measuring port devolution program performance: a managerial perspective", Research in Transportation Economics, 17, pp.599~629 (2006)
- Brooks, M. R., "Measuring port effectiveness in user service delivery: What really determines users' evaluations of port service delivery?", Research in Transportation Business &Management, 8, pp.87~96 (2013)
- Ha, M. H., "Revisiting port performance measurement:A hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modelling of port performance indicators", Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 103, pp.1~16 (2017)
- Lai, K. H., "Supply chain performance in transport logistics: an assessment by service providers", International Journal of Logistics:Research and Applications, 6(3), pp.151~164 (2003)
- Lee, P. T. W., "Evaluation of the service quality of container ports by importance-performance analysis", International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 4(3), pp.197~211 (2012)
- Lee, P. T. W., "Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics –Making Global Supply Chain Effective, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 220", pp.97~136 (2015), Springer
- Marlow, P. B., "Measuring lean ports performance", International Journal of Transport Management, 1(4), pp.189~202 (2003)
- Martilla, J.A, "Importanceperformance analysis", The journal of marketing, pp.77~79 (1977)
- Oh, H., "Revisiting importance–performance analysis", Tourism management, 22(6), pp.617~627 (2001)
- Panayides, P. M., "Port integration in global supply chains: measures and implications for maritime logistics", International Journal of Logistics:Research and Applications, 12(2), pp.133~145 (2009)
- Saaty, T. L., "The Analytical Hierarchy Process:Planning Prioritysetting, Resource Allocation" (1980), McGraw-Hill
- Shin, H. W, "An empirical study on the perception of port service quality-Primarily on SERVQUAL model in container terminal", Journal of the Korean Institute of Navigation, 15(1), pp.1~18 (2001)
- Tonge, J, "Importancesatisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study", Tourism Management, 28(3), pp.768~776 (2007)
- Ugboma, C., "Service quality measurements in ports of a developing economy:Nigerian ports survey", Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 14(6), pp.487~495 (2004)