Towards a generic framework for the development of logistics in seaports: lessons from the Busan case
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a generic framework on port logistics development and its interaction with hinterland regions. Although earlier work on the topic (e.g. by Ferrari et al., 2006; Kuipers and Eenhuizen, 2004) offers valuable insights in the subject, it contains limitations in geographical applicability. Ports indeed face dissimilarities in, for instance, locational characteristics (a.o. distance from the sea and nautical accessibility) and hinterland connections. Only when a model for determining seaport-located logistics activities takes into account these issues of dissimilarity among ports, the framework could be applied to a variety of seaport ranges worldwide. In this paper we aim to provide a first version of such a framework. More particularly, by means of a survey conducted in the Port of Busan the shortcomings of traditional approaches are illustrated. We then propose a more encompassing model, which seems to explain fairly well the attractiveness of Busan in terms of logistics activities. This framework explicitly adds port and hinterland characteristics to the list of factors decisive in the choice of the location of logistics activities. Finally, we would like to remark that our research on this topic is still ongoing and results for surveys planned in New York and Antwerp will be reported in a later stage
Abstract
This paper presents a generic framework on port logistics development and its interaction with hinterland regions. Although earlier work on the topic (e.g. by Ferrari et al., 2006; Kuipers and Eenhuizen, 2004) offers valuable insights in the subject, it contains limitations in geographical applicability. Ports indeed face dissimilarities in, for instance, locational characteristics (a.o. distance from the sea and nautical accessibility) and hinterland connections. Only when a model for determining seaport-located logistics activities takes into account these issues of dissimilarity among ports, the framework could be applied to a variety of seaport ranges worldwide. In this paper we aim to provide a first version of such a framework. More particularly, by means of a survey conducted in the Port of Busan the shortcomings of traditional approaches are illustrated. We then propose a more encompassing model, which seems to explain fairly well the attractiveness of Busan in terms of logistics activities. This framework explicitly adds port and hinterland characteristics to the list of factors decisive in the choice of the location of logistics activities. Finally, we would like to remark that our research on this topic is still ongoing and results for surveys planned in New York and Antwerp will be reported in a later stage
참고문헌 (17)
- Bird, J, "Seaports and Seaport Terminals" (1980), Hutchinson University Library
- Buck Consultants International, "Seaports and Their Hinterland" (1996), Buck ConsultantsInternational
- Derveaux, H, "Port logistics: the Antwerp case. in Proceedings of the First InternationalConference on Logistics Strategy for Ports", pp.394~407 (2004), Dalian Maritime University Press
- Ferrari, C, "Southern European Ports and the Spatial Distribution of EDCs", Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8, pp.60~81 (2006)
- Frankel, E.G, "Port Planning and Development" (1987), John Wiley & Sons
- Kuipers, B, "Liege, Tongeren, Genk or the Maasvlakte: What’'s the Difference? Spatial Behaviour of Europan Distribution Centres. in Vervoerslogistieke werkdagen 1999" (1999), Connekt
- Kuipers, B, "A Framework for the Analysis of Seaport-based Logistics Parks. in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Logistics Strategy for Ports", pp.151~171 (2004), Dalian Maritime Uni
- Notteboom, T, "FR-WP1: Overall Market Dynamics and Their Influence on the Port Sector. in Factual Report on the European Port Sector", ~ (2004)
- "European Sea Ports Organisation. 4-60. Brussels: ESPO", ~
- Notteboom, T, "Port Regionalization: towards a New Phase in Port Development", Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), pp.297~313 (2005)
- Prologis-CapGemini, "Moving Freight Today - How Shippers are Creating Greater Capacity, Reliability and Rate Stability", Prologis Supply Chain Review (2006)
- TNO Inro, "EDC’'s op de vlakte houden!" (2004), TNO Inro.
- United Nations, "Commercial Development of Regional Ports as Logistics Centres", Research Report of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. New York. (2002)
- United Nations, "Free Trade Zone and Port Hinterland Development", Research Report of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. New York. (2005)
- Valentine, V.F, "The Measurement of Port Efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. World Conference on Transport Research. Special Interest Group-2. http:", news, pp.forum, 2000[DOI]
- Van Klink, H.A, "Gateways and Intermodalism", Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), pp.1~9 (1998)
- Woxenius, J, "The Dry Port Concept ?- Connecting Seaports with Their Hinterland by Rail. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Logistics Strategy for Ports, eds. S. Licheng and T. Notteboom. 305-319. Dalia", ~ (2004)