본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on Establishment of Essential Performance Evaluation Criteria for C-arm Computed Tomography

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

In order to overcome the image quality limitations of the conventional C-arm, a flat panel detector (FPD) is used to enhance spatial resolution, detective quantum efficiency, frame rate, and dynamic range. Three-dimensional (3D) visualized information can be obtained from C-arm computed tomography (CT) equipped with an FPD, which can reduce patient discomfort and provide various medical information to health care providers by conducting procedures in the interventional procedure room without moving the patient to the CT scan room. Unlike a conventional C-arm device, a C-arm CT requires different basic safety and essential performance evaluation criteria; therefore, in this study, basic safety and essential performance evaluation criteria to protect patients, medical staff, and radiologists were derived based on International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) standards in Korea, and the rules on the installation and operation of special medical equipment in Korea. As a result of the study, six basic safety evaluation criteria related to electrical and mechanical radiation safety (leakage current, collision protection, emergency stopping device, overheating, recovery management, and ingress of water or particulate matter into medical electrical (ME) equipment and ME systems: footswitches) and 14 essential performance evaluation criteria (accuracy of tube voltage, accuracy of tube current, accuracy of loading time, accuracy of current time product, reproducibility of radiation output, linearity and consistency in radiography, half layer value in X-ray equipment, focal size and collimator, relationship between X-ray field and image reception area, consistency of light irradiation versus X-ray irradiation, performance of the mechanical device, focal spot to skin distance accuracy, image quality evaluation, and technical characteristic of cone-beam computed tomography) were selected for a total of 20 criteria.

Abstract

In order to overcome the image quality limitations of the conventional C-arm, a flat panel detector (FPD) is used to enhance spatial resolution, detective quantum efficiency, frame rate, and dynamic range. Three-dimensional (3D) visualized information can be obtained from C-arm computed tomography (CT) equipped with an FPD, which can reduce patient discomfort and provide various medical information to health care providers by conducting procedures in the interventional procedure room without moving the patient to the CT scan room. Unlike a conventional C-arm device, a C-arm CT requires different basic safety and essential performance evaluation criteria; therefore, in this study, basic safety and essential performance evaluation criteria to protect patients, medical staff, and radiologists were derived based on International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) standards in Korea, and the rules on the installation and operation of special medical equipment in Korea. As a result of the study, six basic safety evaluation criteria related to electrical and mechanical radiation safety (leakage current, collision protection, emergency stopping device, overheating, recovery management, and ingress of water or particulate matter into medical electrical (ME) equipment and ME systems: footswitches) and 14 essential performance evaluation criteria (accuracy of tube voltage, accuracy of tube current, accuracy of loading time, accuracy of current time product, reproducibility of radiation output, linearity and consistency in radiography, half layer value in X-ray equipment, focal size and collimator, relationship between X-ray field and image reception area, consistency of light irradiation versus X-ray irradiation, performance of the mechanical device, focal spot to skin distance accuracy, image quality evaluation, and technical characteristic of cone-beam computed tomography) were selected for a total of 20 criteria.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Wallace MJ, "Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT : Applications in the interventional suite", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 20(7), pp.S523~S537 (2009)
  2. Fahrig R, "Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system", Med Phys, 33(12), pp.4541~4550 (2006)
  3. Orth RC, "Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology. C-arm cone-beam CT: General principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology", J Vasc Interv Radiol, 20(7), pp.S538~S544 (2009)
  4. Hirota S, "Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: Early experience in abdominal interventional procedures", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 29(6), pp.1034~1038 (2006)
  5. Baba R, "Comparison of flat-panel detector and image-intensifier detector for cone-beam CT", Comput Med Imaging Graph, 26(3), pp.153~158 (2002)
  6. Ning R, "Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging : System evaluation", IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 19(9), pp.949~963 (2000)
  7. Siewerdsen JH, "Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm : Pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery", Med Phys, 32(1), pp.241~254 (2005)
  8. Akpek S, "Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector", Diagn Interv Radiol, 11(1), pp.10~13 (2005)
  9. Regulations on medical device item and classification, "Ministry of Food and Drug Safety", ~, pp.Ministry of Food and Drug Safety Notice No. 2021-24
  10. Food and Drug Administration, "Computed tomography x-ray system", FDA-892.1750, ~
  11. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, "Basic requirements conformity checklist: Standard for whole-body X-ray CT diagnostic equipment", MHLW-No. 112, ~
  12. International Electrotechnical Commission, "IEC 60601-2-43 Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-43: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures", ~ (2010)
  13. International Electrotechnical Commission, "IEC 60601-2-44 Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-44: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for computed tomography", ~ (2016)
  14. International Electrotechnical Commission, "IEC 61223-3-5, Ed 1.0. Evaluation and routine testing in medical imaging departments-Part 3-5:Acceptance and constancy tests-Imaging performance of computed tomography X-ray equipment", ~ (2019)
  15. International Electrotechnical Commission, "IEC 60601-2-54 Medical electrical equipment-Part 2-54: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for radiography and radioscopy", ~ (2018)
  16. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, "Medical device standard: Attached table 2, appliance equipment 8 diagnostic X-ray system", ~ (2021)
  17. International Electrotechnical Commission, "IEC 60601-1-3 Medical electrical equipment-Part 1-3:General requirements for basic safety and essential performance-Collateral Standard: Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray equipment", ~ (2008)
  18. Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Rules on the installation and operation of special medical equipment", Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 817, ~ (2021)
  19. 김은혜, "A Study on Establishment of Basic Safety and Essential Performance Criteria of Mobile Computed Tomography", 방사선기술과학, 44(3), pp.261~267 (2021), 대한방사선과학회
  20. Mollura JD, "Radiology in global health: Strategies, implementation, and applications" (2019), Springer
  21. Radiation protection guidance diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures, "Intergency Working Group on Medicla Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency", ~, pp.Federal Guidance Report No. 14
  22. International Atomic Energy Agency, "Radiation protection and safety in medical uses of ionizing radiation: IAEA safety standards for protection people and the environment", IAEA-DS399, ~
  23. 최민혁, "전산화단층촬영검사 시 검사실 내에 위치할 수 있는 의료인의 간접 피폭선량에 대한 연구", 방사선기술과학, 42(2), pp.105~111 (2019), 대한방사선과학회

관련 논문AI추천

A Study on Establishment of Basic Safety and Essential Performance Criteria of Mobile Computed Tomography김은혜, 김정민, 박혜민대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2021 · 제44권 제3호수술 중 C-Arm Neutral AP 검사 시 조절인자에 따른피폭선량 및 화질비교 (L-Spine AP검사를 기준으로)동경래, 송하진, 정운관, 조황우, 최성현, 최은진(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2015 · 제9권 제2호인터벤션 방사선발생장치에서 입사표면선량률 평가강병삼, 장광현대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2020 · 제43권 제5호s-IGDT 시스템의 X-선원 배열 형태 및 투영상 개수에 따른 영상 화질 평가에 관한 연구남기복, 이다혜, 이승완대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2022 · 제45권 제2호KS C IEC60601-1-3: 의료용 전기기기-제1-3부: 기본 안전 및 필수 성능에 관한 일반 요구사항-보조표준: 진단용 X선 장치의 방사선 방어를 적용한 진단용 방사선 발생장치의 검사기준 개선안김성옥, 김정민, 김정수, 박혜민, 최영민대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2018 · 제41권 제5호인터벤션에서 자동노출제어장치와 수동노출 사용 시 두께 변화에 따른 선량감소 방안 연구김현수, 이경배, 정구민, 최지안, 황준호대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2018 · 제41권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)