본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사전 기술을 이용한 단어 유사도 측정 방안

Words Similarity Based on Dictionary Description

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper aims to describe words similarity with intuition, objectivity, and measuring possibility. Measuring the words similarity have importance in that it gives us the standard with clearness. With the similarity standard we can decide which words could be called the ‘similar word’. But if we do not consider word's meaning in measuring the words similarity the result often does not comply with our intuition and not acceptable. So the measuring way should contain human intention which tells two words meaning are very close. To get the intention, dictionary's description were used. Because dictionaries are written by many experts in linguistics with accumulated efforts, we can regard it have proper description about words real meaning. So generally the descriptions comply with our intention. Descriptions were separated with words, and high frequency words were excluded. The result gives the words real meaning in forms of ‘word’. In addition to that, only the expressions which more than 2 dictionaries used are chosen. One dictionary some times can use unappropriated expressions, but if two or more dictionaries used the same expression, we can put higher trust on that expression. Consequently we get the objectivity. Finally when we use above results, we can draw its connection paths and calculate its similarity. When the two words are similar, they will have same expressions which tells its meaning. The same expressions, in other words ‘properties’ let the two words have connection path. And with this path, we clearly know they have similarity. When connection paths were drawn to all the words, the similarity can be counted. If two words have connection path directly we can say their similarity is 1st level, and if they are connected via another word we can say their similarity is 2nd level. In this way words similarity can be counted. And this paper designed the auto level-tracking program. It calculates the similarity level of two words. If there are some complements, the full process could be done automatically without human labor.

Abstract

This paper aims to describe words similarity with intuition, objectivity, and measuring possibility. Measuring the words similarity have importance in that it gives us the standard with clearness. With the similarity standard we can decide which words could be called the ‘similar word’. But if we do not consider word's meaning in measuring the words similarity the result often does not comply with our intuition and not acceptable. So the measuring way should contain human intention which tells two words meaning are very close. To get the intention, dictionary's description were used. Because dictionaries are written by many experts in linguistics with accumulated efforts, we can regard it have proper description about words real meaning. So generally the descriptions comply with our intention. Descriptions were separated with words, and high frequency words were excluded. The result gives the words real meaning in forms of ‘word’. In addition to that, only the expressions which more than 2 dictionaries used are chosen. One dictionary some times can use unappropriated expressions, but if two or more dictionaries used the same expression, we can put higher trust on that expression. Consequently we get the objectivity. Finally when we use above results, we can draw its connection paths and calculate its similarity. When the two words are similar, they will have same expressions which tells its meaning. The same expressions, in other words ‘properties’ let the two words have connection path. And with this path, we clearly know they have similarity. When connection paths were drawn to all the words, the similarity can be counted. If two words have connection path directly we can say their similarity is 1st level, and if they are connected via another word we can say their similarity is 2nd level. In this way words similarity can be counted. And this paper designed the auto level-tracking program. It calculates the similarity level of two words. If there are some complements, the full process could be done automatically without human labor.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김광해, "유의어·반의어 사전" (1987), 한샘
  2. 김광해, "국어 유의어 사전 편찬을 위한 기초적 연구", 국어교육, 61, pp.183~199 (1987), 한국어교육학회
  3. 김광해, "어휘 연구의 실제와 응용" (1995), 집문당
  4. 김광해, "유의어의 의미 비교를 통한 뜻풀이 정교화 방안에 대한 연구", 선청어문, 26, pp.5~40 (1998), 서울대학교 국어교육과
  5. 김광해, "형용사 유의어의 뜻풀이 정교화 방안에 대한 연구-‘아름답다-추하다’군을 중심으로", 선청어문, 27, pp.605~631 (1999), 서울대학교 국어교육과
  6. 김은영, "감정동사 유의어의 의미 연구-‘즐겁다’, ‘무섭다’의 유의어를 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 14, pp.121~147 (2004), 한국어의미학회
  7. 김흥규, "한국어 형태소 및 어휘 사용 빈도의 분석 2" (2004), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
  8. 양명희, "국어사전의 유의어에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 22, pp.165~184 (2007), 한국어의미학회
  9. "한국어 어휘의미망 ‘KorLex 1.5’의 정보구조와 활용현황"[URL]
  10. 이익섭, "국어학개설" (1986), 학연사
  11. 이진걸, "문맥을 통한 유의어간의 유의도 측정에 관한 試考", 선청어문, 5, pp.75~104 (1974)
  12. 조인식, "서술어 Bigram을 이용한 단어 유사도 측정", 언어학, 50(50), pp.229~254 (2008), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  13. 천시권, "국어의미론" (1973), 형설출판사
  14. 최경봉, "국어 명사의 의미 연구" (1998), 태학사
  15. 최석재, "감정동사의 유형과 그 의미특성", 어문논집, 58(58), pp.127~159 (2008), 민족어문학회
  16. Chomsky, "Aspect of the Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  17. Dekang Lin, "Information Theoretic definition of similarity", 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (1998)
  18. Hirst, G, "Lexical chanis as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms", Fellbaum, pp.305~332 (1998)
  19. Osgood, C.E., "The Measurement of Meaning" (1957), University of Illinois Press
  20. "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
  21. 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
  22. 금성출판사 사전팀, "푸르넷 초등 국어사전" (2001), 금성출판사
  23. "조선말대사전" (2006), 사회과학출판사
  24. 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세 한국어사전" (1999)
  25. 운평어문연구소, "금성판 국어대사전" (1996), 금성출판사
  26. 한글학회, "우리말 큰사전" (1992), 어문각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)