Lexical borrowing patterns in the Korean-English neologisms
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to find out the recent lexical borrowing phenomenon in the Korean-English neologisms by sorting out and analyzing loanwords and loanblends under Einar Haugen’s study of borrowing where he classified lexical borrowing into three major categories: loanwords, loanblends and loanshifts. This paper attempts to explain the loanwords and loanblends in the Korean-English neologisms extracted from 188 Korean neologisms 2017 reported by The National Institute of The Korean Language, and argues that most of lexical borrowing in Korean-English neologisms occurs in the form of loanblends rather than loanwords, and locally produced English words like Konglish cannot be classified as either loanwords or loanblends as it does not meet the conditions of none of these two categories. The results show that over 54.25% of the Korean neologisms where English is responsible for over 90% of the entire loanwords and loanblends is made through clipping and blending word-formation processes which allow the form of loanblends while loanwords occupy only 6.91%.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to find out the recent lexical borrowing phenomenon in the Korean-English neologisms by sorting out and analyzing loanwords and loanblends under Einar Haugen’s study of borrowing where he classified lexical borrowing into three major categories: loanwords, loanblends and loanshifts. This paper attempts to explain the loanwords and loanblends in the Korean-English neologisms extracted from 188 Korean neologisms 2017 reported by The National Institute of The Korean Language, and argues that most of lexical borrowing in Korean-English neologisms occurs in the form of loanblends rather than loanwords, and locally produced English words like Konglish cannot be classified as either loanwords or loanblends as it does not meet the conditions of none of these two categories. The results show that over 54.25% of the Korean neologisms where English is responsible for over 90% of the entire loanwords and loanblends is made through clipping and blending word-formation processes which allow the form of loanblends while loanwords occupy only 6.91%.
참고문헌 (18)
- Algeo, J. T., "Korean Bamboo English", American Speech, 35, pp.117~123 (1960)
- Arnold, I.V., "The English Word" (1986), Publishing Higher School
- Bojčić, Ivana, "Language Borrowing", Collected papers of the Međimurska polytechnic in Čakovec, 3(2), pp.714~ (2012)[DOI]
- Filipović, Rudolf, "Anglicism in Croatian or Serbian" (1990), Školska knjiga
- Filipović, Rudolf, "Language theory in contact" (1990), Školska knjiga
- Greavu, Arina, "A Classification of Borrowings: Observations from Romanian", English Contact, 2013, pp.10(2), 95~
- Haugen, Einar, "The analysis of linguistic borrowing", Language, 26, pp.10~331 (1950)
- Hoffer, Bates. L., "Language Borrowing and Language Diffusion: An Overview", Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(4), pp.1~36 (2002)[DOI]
- Kachru, Braj, "English in the world", pp.11~30 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Kiaer, Jieun, "Hybrid English words in Korean and Japanese:a strange brew or an asset for global English?", Asian Englishes, 19(2), pp.169~187 (2017)[DOI]
- Kirkpatrick, Andy, "The Routledge Companion to English Studies" (2014), Routledge
- 이상도, "영어 차용어 축약과 혼성어", 코기토, 73, pp.330~352 (2013), 인문학연구소
- 노명희, "외래어 단어형성", 국어국문학, (153), pp.5~30 (2009), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- New Words of 2017, "National Institute of the Korean Language", The National Institute of the Korean Language, ~ (2017)
- Webster, G., "Korean Bamboo English once more", American Speech, 35, pp.261~265 (1960)
- Winford, Donald, "An Introduction to Contact Linguistics" (2003), Blackwell Publishing