New Word-formation Processes
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to investigate how new words are produced in Korean and to analyze two word-formation processes, truncation and blending within the framework of Correspondence Theory. Two word-formation processes have common characteristics: first, they have the minimal requirement that new words have at least two syllables. Second, in the word-formation process, exceptional cases can be dealt within the core-periphery structure suggested by Itô and Mester (1995). Finally, the word-formation processes in Korean show much more simplistic patterns than in English or even English loanwords in Korean. In the truncation analysis, all morphemes should be involved in the process and in case of loanword truncation, it matters whether truncated words are listed in the English lexicon. Unlike English blending, the existence of sharing segments or the role as a switch point of feet or sub-syllables do not play a crucial role in the analysis. Some other words are created by wrong analogies, typos, and other social reasons.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to investigate how new words are produced in Korean and to analyze two word-formation processes, truncation and blending within the framework of Correspondence Theory. Two word-formation processes have common characteristics: first, they have the minimal requirement that new words have at least two syllables. Second, in the word-formation process, exceptional cases can be dealt within the core-periphery structure suggested by Itô and Mester (1995). Finally, the word-formation processes in Korean show much more simplistic patterns than in English or even English loanwords in Korean. In the truncation analysis, all morphemes should be involved in the process and in case of loanword truncation, it matters whether truncated words are listed in the English lexicon. Unlike English blending, the existence of sharing segments or the role as a switch point of feet or sub-syllables do not play a crucial role in the analysis. Some other words are created by wrong analogies, typos, and other social reasons.
참고문헌 (17)
- 안수지, "(A)constraint-based analysis of Korean blends", 석사, 언어학과 언어학전공, pp.2012
- Bat-El, O, "Selecting the best of the worst: the grammar of Hebrew blends", Phonology, 13, pp.283~328 (1996)
- Benua, L, "UMOP 18", pp.77~136 (1995), University of Massachusetts
- Bauer, L, "English word-formation" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Casali, P. R, "Vowel ellison in hiatus contexts: which vowel goes", Language, 73(3), pp.493~533 (1997)
- 홍성훈, "An Optimality Theoretic Analysis of English Blends", 언어, 30(3), pp.551~582 (2005), 한국언어학회
- Itô, J, "UMOP 18", pp.198~290 (1995), University of Massachusetts
- 진미주, "English Blends: A Descriptive Study of their Distributional Patterns and Prosodic Features", 언어연구, 20(3), pp.195~231 (2005), 한국현대언어학회
- Kubozono, H, "Phonological constraints on blending in English as a case for phonology-morphology interface", Yearbook of Morphology, 3, pp.1~20 (1990)
- Laubrune, L, "The Prosodic structure of simple abbreviated loanwords in Japanese: a constraint-based account", Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 6(1), pp.98~120 (2002)
- Lee, Joo-hee, "The phonology of loanwords and lexical stratification in Korean", 박사, pp.2003
- McCarthy, J, "UMOP 18", pp.249~384 (1995), University of Massachusetts
- Prince, A, "Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar", 석사, pp.1993
- Prince, A, "Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar" (2004), Blackwell Publication
- 서홍원, "The Truncation of Englsih Loanwords in Korean: An Optimality-Theoretic Approach", 신영어영문학, (37), pp.213~236 (2007), 신영어영문학회
- 서홍원, "Blending in English and English Loanwords: An Optimality Theoretic Approach", 언어학, 19(2), pp.35~55 (2011), 대한언어학회
- 서홍원, "Some Aspects on Korean Blends: An Optimality-theoretic Analysis", 언어학, 21(3), pp.135~150 (2013), 대한언어학회