새로운 성년후견제도에 있어서 신상보호 ―신상결정의 대행과 그 한계―
Substitution for Making a Decision Regarding Personal Affairs and Limits in the New Adult Guardianship System of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
52
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current Korean Civil Code provides that an adult guardian has the power of representation only for legal acts on behalf of a ward but making a decision regarding his/her personal affairs. Accordingly, it has been doubted that the adult guardian has the power of making a decision regarding personal affairs of a ward under article 947 or 938 in the current Korean Civil Code. Additionally, it has been criticized that the current adult guardian system in Korean Civil Code was not concerned with personal affairs of the ward. For this reason, the new adult guardianship system (partially amended Korean Civil Code, March 7, 2011) provides that the power of making a decision regarding personal affairs of the ward by the Family Court could be authorized to the adult guardian. And so, in the new adult guardianship system, the official work of the adult guardian is concerned with property and physical custody. However, this work does not include de facto acts by guardian himself/herself. According to the article 947-2 of the amended Korean Civil Code, the adult guardian's power of decision making regarding personal affairs of the ward might be exercised only for the case which the ward himself/herself may not exercise the power of decision making regarding his/her personal affairs. If the ward has to stay for medical reasons against his/her will in a psychiatric hospital or to undergo an operation which may cause its death, the adult guardian who takes the decision, has to simultaneously ask for permission from the Family Court. Furthermore, it seems that capacity to make a decision regarding personal affairs is different from legal capacity.
Abstract
The current Korean Civil Code provides that an adult guardian has the power of representation only for legal acts on behalf of a ward but making a decision regarding his/her personal affairs. Accordingly, it has been doubted that the adult guardian has the power of making a decision regarding personal affairs of a ward under article 947 or 938 in the current Korean Civil Code. Additionally, it has been criticized that the current adult guardian system in Korean Civil Code was not concerned with personal affairs of the ward. For this reason, the new adult guardianship system (partially amended Korean Civil Code, March 7, 2011) provides that the power of making a decision regarding personal affairs of the ward by the Family Court could be authorized to the adult guardian. And so, in the new adult guardianship system, the official work of the adult guardian is concerned with property and physical custody. However, this work does not include de facto acts by guardian himself/herself. According to the article 947-2 of the amended Korean Civil Code, the adult guardian's power of decision making regarding personal affairs of the ward might be exercised only for the case which the ward himself/herself may not exercise the power of decision making regarding his/her personal affairs. If the ward has to stay for medical reasons against his/her will in a psychiatric hospital or to undergo an operation which may cause its death, the adult guardian who takes the decision, has to simultaneously ask for permission from the Family Court. Furthermore, it seems that capacity to make a decision regarding personal affairs is different from legal capacity.
참고문헌 (40)
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2003), 박영사
- 고영남, "민법총칙" (2004), 한국방송대학교출판부
- 김증한, "민법총칙" (1995), 박영사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2011), 박영사
- 홍성재, "민법총칙" (2005), 도서출판 대영문화사
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2011), 홍문사
- 김형석, "민법개정안 해설 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료집", 법무부, 1~ (2009)
- 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 김천수, "成年後見과 醫療行爲의 決定", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.1~30 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 김민중, "성년후견제도의 도입에 관한 논의에서 의료행위와 관련한 과제", 저스티스, 112, pp.208~239 (2009), 한국법학원
- 박인환, "새로운 성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안의 검토", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.31~74 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 박인환, "일본 메이지민법(총칙편: 인·능력)의 입법이유 분석", 민사법학, 54(1), pp.259~321 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 백승흠, "현행 성년자보호를 위한 제도의 문제점과 대안으로서의 성년후견제도", 민사법학, (24) (2003), 한국민사법학회
- 백승흠, "후견인의 요양, 감호의무에 관한 고찰 - 개정전 일본 민법의 해석론과 성년후견을 중심으로", 가족법연구, 18(2), pp.149~176 (2004), 한국가족법학회
- 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 도입과 과제", 법학논총, 27(1), pp.23~48 (2010), 법학연구소
- 백승흠, "민법개정안의 성년후견제도와 피후견인의 신상보호", 법학논고, (35), pp.53~80 (2011), 법학연구원
- 신영호, "고령화사회에 있어서의 후견제도", 가족법연구, (11), pp.359~ (1997)
- 이재경, "의료분야에서 성년후견제도의 활용에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 21(3), pp.255~279 (2009), 법학연구소
- 제철웅, "성년후견제도의 개정방향", 민사법학, (42), pp.111~149 (2008), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
- 홍춘의, "후견제도 개혁의 과제", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.1~39 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 磯部四郞, "民法(明治23年)釋義 人事編之部(下)(復刻板)", 日本 立法資料全集 別卷, (90) (1997), 信山社
- 梅謙次郞, "民法要義 卷之一(總則編)" (1909), 有斐閣書房
- 梅謙次郞, "民法要義 卷之四(親族編)" (1910), 有斐閣書房
- 谷久知平, "佛蘭西民法 (1) 人事法" (1956), 有斐閣
- "新版 注釋民法(25)" (1994), 有斐閣
- 新井誠, "高齡社會と成年後見法(改訂版)" (1999), 有斐閣
- 大村敦志, "家族法" (2004), 有斐閣
- 한복룡, "家族法講義" (2009), 충남대학교출판부
- 成年後見問題硏究會報告書, "成年後見問題硏究會", 金融財政事情硏究會, ~ (1997)
- 床谷文雄, "成年後見における身上配慮義務", 民商法雜誌, 122(4-5) (2000)
- 道垣內弘人, "身上監護｣｢本{人意思の尊重", ついて,” ジュリスト, (1141), pp.31~ (1998)
- 道垣內弘人, "成年後見制度私案", ジュリスト, 2(1075) (1995)
- 水野紀子, "後見人の身上監護義務", 判例タイムズ, (1030), pp.97~ (2000)
- 小賀野晶, "成年身上監護制度論(1), (2), (3), (4),”", ジュリスト No 1090, 1092, 1093, 1094, ~
- 神野礼斉, "ドイツ世話法における居所指定権行使の限界(一)", 広島法学, 22(4), pp.189~
- Münchkomm-BGB, "Schwab" (1904)
- Andreas, Jugeleit, "Betreuungsrecht (Handkommentar)" (2010), Nomos Verlags
- Andreas Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht Kommentar" (2010), München
- Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht Kompakt, 7 Aufl" (2011), C.H.Beck