이혼급부에 대한 검토 ―재산분할, 부양료, 위자료 청구의 개별적 근거―
Study on Divorce Payment
0
조회
0
다운로드
25
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When examining the contents of payments intended to be requested by a divorcee to the person they are divorcing, it is mostly composed of alimony from ① liquidating property, ② living expenses subsequential to the divorce, and ③ mental anguish due to the divorce. Among these contents, ① and ③ proves a definite basis since ① is abided by the claim for dividing property (under Civil Code Article 839-2 and Article 843), ③ is abided by the indemnities claims for mental damages (under Civil Code Article 843, Article 806 clause 2). However, ② does not have a clear legal basis, therefore, the discussion was arranged by the historic precedents and their process of development, or occasionally involved in the alimony or the claim for division of property. However, because alimony and claim for division of property was included for the basis of support payment, it resulted in the problem with having ambiguities in the nature of the claim for division of property or alimony. In this paper, the historical development of the legal regulations related to divorce payments are examined in order to reveal the reasons of indemnities claims or claim for division of property that are the basis for support payment after divorce (II). Then, claims for division of property due to legal divorce are proven to be a system for not of paying support payment but for ‘settlement’ (III. 1.). Also, it reveals that alimony from divorce is based on the fact that it is of a violation of the marriage contract (III. 2.). Based on these points, support payment after divorce is based on the violation of contingent rights for duty of supporting expenses pursuant to the marriage contract, and by revealing that it is based on the indemnities claims (Civil Code Article 843 and Article 806 clause 1) of properties (III. 3.), the basis and range of the three divorce payments are explicated respectively.
Abstract
When examining the contents of payments intended to be requested by a divorcee to the person they are divorcing, it is mostly composed of alimony from ① liquidating property, ② living expenses subsequential to the divorce, and ③ mental anguish due to the divorce. Among these contents, ① and ③ proves a definite basis since ① is abided by the claim for dividing property (under Civil Code Article 839-2 and Article 843), ③ is abided by the indemnities claims for mental damages (under Civil Code Article 843, Article 806 clause 2). However, ② does not have a clear legal basis, therefore, the discussion was arranged by the historic precedents and their process of development, or occasionally involved in the alimony or the claim for division of property. However, because alimony and claim for division of property was included for the basis of support payment, it resulted in the problem with having ambiguities in the nature of the claim for division of property or alimony. In this paper, the historical development of the legal regulations related to divorce payments are examined in order to reveal the reasons of indemnities claims or claim for division of property that are the basis for support payment after divorce (II). Then, claims for division of property due to legal divorce are proven to be a system for not of paying support payment but for ‘settlement’ (III. 1.). Also, it reveals that alimony from divorce is based on the fact that it is of a violation of the marriage contract (III. 2.). Based on these points, support payment after divorce is based on the violation of contingent rights for duty of supporting expenses pursuant to the marriage contract, and by revealing that it is based on the indemnities claims (Civil Code Article 843 and Article 806 clause 1) of properties (III. 3.), the basis and range of the three divorce payments are explicated respectively.
참고문헌 (62)
- 강남진, "재산분할청구권", 민사법연구, 1 (1991), 대한민사법학회
- 국회 법제실, "입법이론과 법제실무" (2008), 국회 법제실
- 김두형, "공유재산분할의 세법적 관견", 민사법연구, 13(1) (2005), 대한민사법학회
- 김성숙, "재산분할제도의 내용 ― 한국과 일본의 판례를 중심으로 ―", 법학논총, (8) (1995), 숭실대학교 법학연구소
- 김안진, "이혼무과실자의 배상책임(2)", 법정, 4(6) (1959), 법정사
- 김완섭, "한국혼인고 ― 법제와 혼속" (1975), 고려대학교출판부
- 김용원, "이혼시 재산분할청구권의 분할대상재산", 법학논총, 20, pp.57~100 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김용제, "한국친족상속법" (1973), 교문사
- 김유미, "재산분할청구권에 관한 소고", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.79~110 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 김주수, "주석 친족상속법" (1970), 법문사
- 김주수, (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "친족상속법" (1964), 법문사
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2008), 법문사
- 명순구, "민법총칙" (2005), 법문사
- 명순구, "실록 대한민국민법 1" (2008), 법문사
- "2005", 서울가정법원 법관가사재판실무연구회
- 민유숙, "재산분할의 구체적 인정범위. in: 가정법원사건의 제문제" (1993), 법원행정처
- 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의록 하권" (1957), 법제사법위원회
- 민의원 법제사법위원회, "민법안심의자료집" (1957), 법제사법위원회
- 박동섭, "주석 가사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
- 박순성, "이혼을 원인으로 하는 손해배상청구권의 법적 성격. in: 가정법원사건의 제문제" (1993), 법원행정처
- 박정기, "가족법" (2008), 삼영사
- 방혜신, "민법상 이혼원인에 관한 실증적 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 배경숙, "한국여성사법사" (1988), 인하대학교출판부
- 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2000), 제일법규
- 배성호, "재산분할청구권의 본질에 관한 재검토(하)", 사법행정, 42(12) (2001), 한국사법행정학회
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요(가사)" (1994), 법원행정처
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2008), 박영사
- 윤황지, "이혼급부상의 재산분할청구권의 결정기준", 가족법연구, (8) (1994), 한국가족법학회
- 이경희, "가족법(전정판)" (2008), 법원사
- 이종한, "이혼제도와 실태", 한국심리학회지 여성, 5(2) (2000), 한국심리학회
- 이태영, "가족법 개정운동 37년사" (1992), 한국가정법률상담소 출판부
- 이태영, "한국이혼연구" (1969), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 한국이혼제도연구, "이태영", 여성문제연구원, ~ (1957)
- 이현재, "이혼위자료의 법적 성격 및 지연손해금의 기산일 등. in: 민사법의 새로운 전개(한도정환담교수 정년기념논문집))" (2006), 용봉민사법학회
- 이화숙, "비교 부부재산관계법" (2000), 세창출판사
- 이화숙, "가족법 판례해설" (2009), 세창출판사
- 이희배, "주석 가족법판례연구" (2007), 삼지원
- "민법친족상속편원요강해설. in: 민법안심의자료집" (1957), 법제사법위원회
- 정광현, "신친족상속법요론" (1962), 법문사
- 정광현, "한국가족법연구" (1967), 서울대학교출판부
- 정광현, "한국친족상속법강의(상권)" (1955), 위성문화사
- 정상현, "離婚으로 인한 財産分割請求權의 法的 性格과 相續의 認定 與否에 대한 法理 再檢討(上)", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.315~342 (2006), 법학연구소
- 정상현, "離婚으로 인한 財産分割請求權의 法的 性格과 相續의 認定 與否에 대한 法理 再檢討(上)", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.315~342 (2006), 법학연구소
- "제26회 국회정기회의속기록 제60호, 국회사무처, 1957. 12. 14", ~ (1957)
- 조미경, "재산분할청구권(1)", 사법행정, 31(8) (1990), 한국사법행정학회
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2009), 홍문사
- 최창열, "이혼에 따른 위자료의 법적 성질에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, (14) (2000), 한국가족법학회
- 한복룡, "파탄주의국가들과 한국의 이혼법", 안암법학, (20) (2005), 안암법학회
- 한복룡, "한국 혼인법론" (1989), 하락도서
- 한봉희, "위자료청구의 제문제. in: 민사법과 환경법의 제문제(송헌 안이준박사 화갑기념논문집)" (1986), 박영사
- 한봉희, "이혼법개정의 제문제. in: 가족법의 제문제" (1984), 법무부 법무실
- 한봉희, "가족법" (2005), 푸른세상
- 황경웅, "이혼 위자료의 지연손해금의 기산일에 관하여. in: 법관 가사재판실무연구모임 자료집 IV" (1998), 서울가정법원
- Garner, Bryan A., "Black’s Law Dictionary" (2009), Thomson Reuters business
- 南雲幸吉, "現行 朝鮮親族相續法類集" (1935), 大阪屋號書店
- 內田貴, "民法の爭點" (2007), 有斐閣
- 島津一郞, "注釋民法(21)" (1968), 有斐閣
- 二宮周平, "家族法(第3版)" (2009), 新世社
- 張昶, "中國における離婚に伴う損害賠償の運用と機能 ― 日本法との比較において―", 北大法政ジャ-ナル, (16) (2009), 北海道大學大學院法學硏究科