가정위탁제도에 관한 법적 고찰 ―위탁부모의 법적지위를 중심으로―
A Study on the Foster Care System in Korea ―Focusing on Legal Status of Foster parents―
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The children who are in need of care and protection have significantly increased in Korea in recent years. Over the past decade in Korea, public child welfare systems have increasingly enlisted child’s relatives or individuals for service as foster parents, thus formalizing the provision of foster care system in the Children’s Welfare Act in 2005. Foster care is the term used for a system in which a minor who has been made ward is placed in the private home of a caregiver referred to as a “foster parent”. Foster care is intended to be a short term situation until a permanent placement can be made, especially for reunification with the biological parents when it is deemed in the child's best interest. On application of the parents or with the parent consent, the foster parents step into the factual role of parent and are responsible for the day-to-day care of a child. However, there has been no legally based conducted about the role of foster parents unlike England and German. In response to such problems, The Parent and Child Act must be reviewed and reformed. The article concludes that The Parent and Child Act must clarify the legal status of those who actually care for a child but do not have parental authority, by providing that may do what is reasonable in all circumstances for the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the child’s “welfare” or “has minimum power necessary to provide for the day-to-day care of a child.” Also, reasonable limitations of parental authority should be defined in The Parent and Child Act. To develop and activate foster care system, it is important to establish the systematic standard. It would improve the children’s welfare in foster care and cultivate the right relationships between foster parents and biological parents.
Abstract
The children who are in need of care and protection have significantly increased in Korea in recent years. Over the past decade in Korea, public child welfare systems have increasingly enlisted child’s relatives or individuals for service as foster parents, thus formalizing the provision of foster care system in the Children’s Welfare Act in 2005. Foster care is the term used for a system in which a minor who has been made ward is placed in the private home of a caregiver referred to as a “foster parent”. Foster care is intended to be a short term situation until a permanent placement can be made, especially for reunification with the biological parents when it is deemed in the child's best interest. On application of the parents or with the parent consent, the foster parents step into the factual role of parent and are responsible for the day-to-day care of a child. However, there has been no legally based conducted about the role of foster parents unlike England and German. In response to such problems, The Parent and Child Act must be reviewed and reformed. The article concludes that The Parent and Child Act must clarify the legal status of those who actually care for a child but do not have parental authority, by providing that may do what is reasonable in all circumstances for the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the child’s “welfare” or “has minimum power necessary to provide for the day-to-day care of a child.” Also, reasonable limitations of parental authority should be defined in The Parent and Child Act. To develop and activate foster care system, it is important to establish the systematic standard. It would improve the children’s welfare in foster care and cultivate the right relationships between foster parents and biological parents.
참고문헌 (36)
- 강현아, "가정위탁보호서비스 배치의 현황과 과제", 2009년 제3회 가정위탁정책세미나 (2009), 중앙가정위탁지원센터
- 김상용, "가정위탁양육에 관한 민법상의 쟁점", 법조, 56(7), pp.94~147 (2007), 법조협회
- 김상용, "면접교섭권", 법학연구, 40(1) (1999), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 김용한, "『친족상속법』 보정판" (2003), 박영사
- 김유미, "현행 친권상실선고제도의 문제점과 대응책", 가족법연구, (11) (1997), 한국가족법학회
- 김주수, "제2판" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "『친족·상속법』 제4전정판" (1998), 법문사
- 김주수, "『친족·상속법』 제9판" (2008), 법문사
- 김형배, "민법학강의 제7판" (2008), 신조사
- 배태순, "해체된 가정의 아동들, 그들은 어떻게 보호되고 있나 ― 국내해체 가정의 아동보호 현황", 한국아동복지학, (9) (2000), 한국아동복지학회
- 성영혜, "아동복지의 이론과 실제" (2002), 동문사
- 송현경, "친권상실에 관한 소고", 재판자료, (101) (2003), 법원도서관
- 우병창, "일본에 있어서 아동인권의 현황:일본의 리친제도를 중심으로", 가족법연구, 17(2), pp.5~192 (2003), 한국가족법학회
- 윤진수, "아동권리협약과 한국가족법", 국제인권법, (8) (2005), 국제인권법학회
- 이은정, "가정위탁(Fostercar)제도에 대한 소고", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.6~234 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 이종길, "가정의 해체와 아동복지에 대한 일검토", 가족법연구, (14) (2000), 한국가족법학회
- 이화숙, "자의 최대의 이익과 현행친권제도", 가족법연구, (2) (1988), 한국가족법학회
- 조미경, "영국법상의 아동보호(Grillick 판결)", 가족법연구, (9) (1995), 한국가족법학회
- 최진섭, "친권법의 쟁점과 개정 방향", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.3~122 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 최진섭, "친권상실에 관한 비교법적 연구", 가족법연구, (10) (1996), 한국가족법학회
- 허남순, "가정위탁보호제도의 과제와 발전방안", 2009년 제3회 가정위탁정책세미나 (2009), 중앙가정위탁지원센터
- 허남순, "가정위탁보호제도의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 한국아동복지학, (9) (2000), 한국아동복지학회
- 허남순, "한국 가정위탁의 역사와 현황", 제6차 가정위탁국제교육세미나자 (2005), 한국수양부모협회
- 허남순, "유엔 아동권리협약의 원칙과 국내 가정위탁보호의 현황분석", 한국아동복지학, (22), pp.95~126 (2006), 한국아동복지학회
- Bainham, "Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare", pp.2003, Andrew
- Bond, Tina, "Family law" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Cretney, Stephen, "Family law in the twentieth century: a history" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Dr. Wolfram Viefhues, "BGB Familienrecht(4 Auflage)" (2009), juris
- Rainer Frank, "獨逸 親子法의 가장 최근의 발전", 가족법연구, 19(2), pp.403~430 (2005), 한국가족법학회
- Lowe, "Family Law(10 edition)" (2007)
- Lowe, N.V., "Allocation of Parental Rights and Responsibilities ― The Position in England and Wales", Family law quarterly, 39(2) (2005)
- Luderitz, "Familienrecht(28 Auflage)" (2007), C. H. Beck
- Masson, J. M., "Principles of family law(8th ed.)" (2008), Sweet & Maxwell
- 보건복지가족부 위탁 중앙가정위탁지원센터, "가정위탁보호(2009년도 아동청소년사업안내)" (2009)
- "중앙가정위탁지원센터 홈페이지"[URL]
- "서울지역가정위탁보호센터 홈페이지"[URL]