본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

재산분할청구권에 관한 소고

A Study on the Division of Matrimonial Property in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since Korean Civil Law has the article regarding claim for division of matrimonial property(839-2) in 1991, there has been considerable amount of papers and cases concerning this article. According Korean Civil Law, claim for division of matrimonial property is based on the article 839-2 but claim for consolation money with divorce is based on the article 843 and 806. And Korean Family Litigation Law classifies claim for division of matrimonial property as a family non-litigation case, on the contrary, claim for consolation money with divorce as a family litigation case. Moreover, one has a character of liquidation, the other has a character of compensation for damage. Therefore the two claims are independent from each other theoretically. But Korean Supreme Court does not confirm the relationship between these two claims. On the other hand, there was a partial reformation of Korean Civil Law in 2007. 12. 21. Among the reformation, there is a new article regarding a right to revocation to protect the claim for division of matrimonial property(839-3). This article aims to protect more substantially a spouse who does not hold the title of the matrimonial property. Without any agreement or final decision by court, Korean Supreme Court was not positive to accept a spouse’s right to revoke the other spouse’s act of disposal which reduced the matrimonial property before 2007. 12. 21. But with this new article (839-3), Korean Supreme Court could be more positive in accepting the right to revoke the other spouse’s act of disposal which is dangerous to the future right on the matrimonial property. Finally this paper suggests the probability of division of matrimonial property before divorce at some circumstances. According Korean Civil Law, a spouse can exercise a claim for division of matrimonial property only in case of divorce. But in some cases, for example, when a spouse does not support the other spouse, when a spouse dispose the matrimonial property and there is not sufficient property to divide at the time of divorce, the division of matrimonial property during marriage would be useful to the other spouse who wants the property and the duration of marriage at the same time.

Abstract

Since Korean Civil Law has the article regarding claim for division of matrimonial property(839-2) in 1991, there has been considerable amount of papers and cases concerning this article. According Korean Civil Law, claim for division of matrimonial property is based on the article 839-2 but claim for consolation money with divorce is based on the article 843 and 806. And Korean Family Litigation Law classifies claim for division of matrimonial property as a family non-litigation case, on the contrary, claim for consolation money with divorce as a family litigation case. Moreover, one has a character of liquidation, the other has a character of compensation for damage. Therefore the two claims are independent from each other theoretically. But Korean Supreme Court does not confirm the relationship between these two claims. On the other hand, there was a partial reformation of Korean Civil Law in 2007. 12. 21. Among the reformation, there is a new article regarding a right to revocation to protect the claim for division of matrimonial property(839-3). This article aims to protect more substantially a spouse who does not hold the title of the matrimonial property. Without any agreement or final decision by court, Korean Supreme Court was not positive to accept a spouse’s right to revoke the other spouse’s act of disposal which reduced the matrimonial property before 2007. 12. 21. But with this new article (839-3), Korean Supreme Court could be more positive in accepting the right to revoke the other spouse’s act of disposal which is dangerous to the future right on the matrimonial property. Finally this paper suggests the probability of division of matrimonial property before divorce at some circumstances. According Korean Civil Law, a spouse can exercise a claim for division of matrimonial property only in case of divorce. But in some cases, for example, when a spouse does not support the other spouse, when a spouse dispose the matrimonial property and there is not sufficient property to divide at the time of divorce, the division of matrimonial property during marriage would be useful to the other spouse who wants the property and the duration of marriage at the same time.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 김용한, "친족상속법" (2003), 박영사
  2. 김주수, "친족상속법" (2006), 법문사
  3. 박병호, "가족법" (1999), 방송대학교출판부
  4. 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2006), 제일법규
  5. 한봉희, "가족법" (2007), 푸른세상
  6. 고창현, "신설된 재산분할청구권, 민사법학의 제문제(소봉 김용한교수회갑기념)" (1990), 박영사
  7. 권정순,지정토론문3, "지정토론문3, 민법(친족상속법) 공청회자료" (2006), 법무부
  8. 김능환, "채권자 취소권, 민법주해(Ⅸ)" (1995), 박영사
  9. 김상용, "부부재산제 개정을 위한 하나의 대안, 가족법 연구Ⅱ" (2006), 법문사
  10. 김수정, "이혼으로 인한 재산분할 청구권 : 사법논집 제40집" (2005), 법원도서관
  11. 김숙자, "재산분할청구권", 가족법연구, (4) (1990)
  12. 김숙자, "친족간의 재산행위와 채권자 취소권, 민사법학의 제 문제(김용한교수 화갑기념)" (1990), 박영사
  13. 김영갑, "재산분할청구권", 사법논집, 16 (1991), 법원행정처
  14. 김준모, "재산분할제도의 성격―실무상 문제점을 중심으로―,가정법원사건의 제 문제(上) in: 재판자료 제101집" (2003), 법원도서관
  15. 민유숙, "재산분할의 구체적 인정 범위, 가정 법원사건의 제 문제", 재판자료, 62 (1993), 법원 행정처
  16. 민유숙, "가사비송사건으로서의 재산분할, 가정법원사건의 제 문제(上)", 재판자료, 101 (2003), 법원도서관
  17. 민유숙,지정토론문2, "지정토론문2 : 민법(친족상속법) 공청회자료" (2006), 법무부
  18. 박기준, "민법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서" (2007), 국회법제사법위원회
  19. 박기준, "가사소송법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서" (2007), 국회법제사법위원회
  20. 박동섭, "지정토론 : 민법(친족상속법)공청회 자료" (2006), 법무부
  21. 양정숙, "지정토론문1 : 가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ)" (2005), 서울가정법원
  22. 윤진수, "민법개정안 중 부부재산제에 관한 주제발표", 법무부주최 민법(친족상속법) 공청회자료 (2006), 법무부
  23. 이상민, "재산분할이 사해행위 취소의 대상이 되는지 여부, 민사판례연구ⅩⅩⅣ" (2001), 박영사
  24. 이상태, "재산분할청구권의 부양적 성질", 아세아여성법학, (4) (2001)
  25. 이상훈, "이혼에 따른 재산분할청구사건의 재판 실무상 문제점에 대한 고찰", 법조, 42(6) (1993)
  26. 이회규, "지정토론문2(부부재산관계의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 토론문)가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ)" (2005), 서울가정법원
  27. 장성원, "재산분할 청구사건을 본안으로 하는 보전처분에 관하여, 가정법원사건의 제 문제", 재판자료, 62 (1993), 재판자료 제62집
  28. 장창민, "재산분할청구권과 채권자취소권에 관한 연구", 민사법학, (37) (2007), 한국민사법학회
  29. 전경근, "이혼에 따른 재산분할과 사해행위취소", 가족법연구, (13) (1999), 한국가족법학회
  30. 전경근, "재산분할 청구권의 피보전 채권성", 가족법연구, 17통권 : 1 (2003)
  31. 전경근, "부부재산관계의 문제점과 개선방안, 가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집(Ⅲ)" (2005), 서울가정법원
  32. 정조근, "재산분할 청구의 산정기준, 현대 민법의 과제와 전망(남송한봉희교수 화갑기념논문집)" (1994), 밀알
  33. 조미경, "재산분할청구권", 사법행정, (356) (1990)
  34. 한애라, "협의재산분할과 사해행위 취소", 인권과 정의, (271) (1999)
  35. 허만, "부부간의 명의신탁해지 청구와 재산분할청구의 관계, 민사판례연구ⅩⅦ" (1995), 박영사
  36. 황우려, "개정된 민법 중 이혼에 관한 문제점", 인권과 정의, (186) (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)