본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인적결합에 있어 사실혼과 연대적 결합체의 상관관계에 관한 고찰

A Study on the Correlation between the De Facto Marriage and the Solidary Bonding in regard to the Human Bonding

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Currently, our society is showing the tendency of recognizing various forms of human bonding according to the rapid changes in various fields. With such changes, there is a tendency of considering the current concept of de facto marriage in the past form according to the definition of the ‘traditional de facto marriage’. As a result, by considering that the de facto marriage is included in the category of marriage, we have to think about whether it is possible to accept such changes related to the concept of de facto marriage. The current concept of de facto marriage, which is used in Korea, is based on the standard of realistic marriage life with the acceptance of the principle of legal marriage with typical conditions. Such a concept has been developed, since the people who are involved in the relationship are required to notify their relationship through the official government document in order to secure clarity and legal security for the marriage relationship. If such a concept for the de facto marriage is regarded as the ‘traditional de facto marriage’, the human bonding which is regarded as the so-called chronological bonding can be sometimes defined as the ‘modern de facto marriage’ with the expansion of the current concept of de facto marriage. Furthermore, the chronological bonding can be defined as either the heterosexual bonding which provides the actual marriage life without the intention of marriage or the homosexual bonding which provides the actual body but has not been systematically protected. In particular, the form of homosexual bonding is no longer a prohibited topic. It is currently considered for protection in regard to the human right, dignity and equality. People now think more about the right to decide their own genders and adoption as well as the freedom related to marriage and divorce. As a result, the chronological bonding can be regarded as the concept which is more complicated than the current concept of de facto marriage. Until now, we have understood and recognized that the de facto marriage is correlated with the legal marriage based on the standard of legal marriage for the human bonding in our society, because we have believed that the people involved in the de facto marriage have the intention of actively accomplishing legitimacy and legality for marriage and possessing the related benefit. However, it is necessary for us to think and refine deeply about the correlation between the chronological bonding and the legal marriage, because the legal form of the chronological bonding has been classified into the marriage bonding which is largely recognized as a complete form of marriage and the non-marriage bonding. Also, according to the characteristics of the above bonding, it seems that there is a correlation with the characteristics of the legal marriage or the de facto marriage in terms of similarities. It has been argued whether the consideration of the correlation between the de facto marriage and the non-marriage bonding can be interpreted either that the non-marriage bonding which is not included in the category of legal marriage can be regarded as the human bonding in an independent form, or that it can be regarded as a form of de facto marriage due to the obstacle related to marriage. Therefore, this paper focuses on the semantic aspect of the correlation between the de facto marriage and the chronological bonding based on the legal marriage in regard to the human bonding instead of finding a clear result for the above topic.

Abstract

Currently, our society is showing the tendency of recognizing various forms of human bonding according to the rapid changes in various fields. With such changes, there is a tendency of considering the current concept of de facto marriage in the past form according to the definition of the ‘traditional de facto marriage’. As a result, by considering that the de facto marriage is included in the category of marriage, we have to think about whether it is possible to accept such changes related to the concept of de facto marriage. The current concept of de facto marriage, which is used in Korea, is based on the standard of realistic marriage life with the acceptance of the principle of legal marriage with typical conditions. Such a concept has been developed, since the people who are involved in the relationship are required to notify their relationship through the official government document in order to secure clarity and legal security for the marriage relationship. If such a concept for the de facto marriage is regarded as the ‘traditional de facto marriage’, the human bonding which is regarded as the so-called chronological bonding can be sometimes defined as the ‘modern de facto marriage’ with the expansion of the current concept of de facto marriage. Furthermore, the chronological bonding can be defined as either the heterosexual bonding which provides the actual marriage life without the intention of marriage or the homosexual bonding which provides the actual body but has not been systematically protected. In particular, the form of homosexual bonding is no longer a prohibited topic. It is currently considered for protection in regard to the human right, dignity and equality. People now think more about the right to decide their own genders and adoption as well as the freedom related to marriage and divorce. As a result, the chronological bonding can be regarded as the concept which is more complicated than the current concept of de facto marriage. Until now, we have understood and recognized that the de facto marriage is correlated with the legal marriage based on the standard of legal marriage for the human bonding in our society, because we have believed that the people involved in the de facto marriage have the intention of actively accomplishing legitimacy and legality for marriage and possessing the related benefit. However, it is necessary for us to think and refine deeply about the correlation between the chronological bonding and the legal marriage, because the legal form of the chronological bonding has been classified into the marriage bonding which is largely recognized as a complete form of marriage and the non-marriage bonding. Also, according to the characteristics of the above bonding, it seems that there is a correlation with the characteristics of the legal marriage or the de facto marriage in terms of similarities. It has been argued whether the consideration of the correlation between the de facto marriage and the non-marriage bonding can be interpreted either that the non-marriage bonding which is not included in the category of legal marriage can be regarded as the human bonding in an independent form, or that it can be regarded as a form of de facto marriage due to the obstacle related to marriage. Therefore, this paper focuses on the semantic aspect of the correlation between the de facto marriage and the chronological bonding based on the legal marriage in regard to the human bonding instead of finding a clear result for the above topic.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 계정민, ""입 밖에 낼 수 없는 죄악"--19세기 영국 동성애 담론", 영어영문학, 51(1), pp.169~186 (2005), 한국영어영문학회
  2. 김민중, "독일의 새로운 가족법상의 제도로서의 동성사이의 생활동반자관계", 가족법연구, 15(2) (2001), 한국가족법학회
  3. 김병록, "동성결혼의 헌법문제", 동아법학, (43), pp.1~27 (2009), 법학연구소
  4. 김용욱, "한국의 사실혼", 가족법연구, (6) (1992), 한국가족법학회
  5. 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
  6. 김태한, "동성혼인 문제의 법률적 고찰", 가족법연구, (13) (1999), 한국가족법학회
  7. 남효순, "프랑스민법상의 동거계약에 관한 연구", 법학, 44 (2003), 서울대학교 법학연구소
  8. 문형진, "문화적 특성이 드러나는 혼인의 의미. in: 세계의 혼인문화" (2005), 한국외국어대학교출판부
  9. 민길자, "사실혼의 현대적 전개 — 파트너십의 유형과 그 보호법리를 중심으로 —", 박사, pp.2005
  10. 박철, "사실혼의 성립요건 —중혼적사실혼 및 혼외동거관계와 관련하여—", 민사판례연구, (19) (1997), 민사판례연구회
  11. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
  12. 박선영, "동성애자의 성적자기결정권과 가족형성의 권리", 시민과 변호사, (96) (2002)
  13. 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2004), 제일법규
  14. 스테파니 쿤츠, "진화하는 결혼" (2009), 작가정신
  15. 양선숙, "동성결혼 허용의 문제", 철학과 현실, 61 (2004), 철학문화연구소
  16. 유재철, "사실혼배우자의 보호와 청구권의 확대", 가족법연구, 15(2) (2001), 한국가족법학회
  17. 윤진수, "혼인의 자유. in: 한국법학50년-과거. 현재. 미래(Ⅱ)" (1998), 한국법학교수회
  18. 이경희, "동성혼인의 보호에 관한 국제적 동향. in: 세계화시대의 법·법률가" (2002), 한국법학교수회
  19. 이경희, "가족법" (2002), 법원사
  20. 이소영, "동성애혼인에 대한 법적 개입의 딜레마와 가족이데올로기 해체", 법철학연구, 10(1) (2007), 한국법철학회
  21. 이재화, "사실혼의 내용과 사실혼존부확인청구제도", 사법논집, (2) (1972), 법원행정처
  22. 이회규, "同性婚姻에 관한 法的 考察- 各 國의 立法 技術을 中心으로 -", 중앙법학, 7(4), pp.299~328 (2005), 중앙법학회
  23. 임정평, "사실혼 문제점에 관한 고찰", 법학논총 (1985), 단국대학교 법학연구소
  24. 장창민, "사실혼과 혼외동거에 관한 일고:재산상 보호를 중심으로", 가족법연구, 17(2), pp.2~86 (2003), 한국가족법학회
  25. 조미경, "독일법상의 법정부부재산제. in: 현대민사법연구: 일헌 최병육교수 정년기념" (2002), 법문사
  26. 조승래, "18세기 영국의 남성 동성애자들", 영국연구, (12), pp.31~46 (2004), 영국사학회
  27. 조홍석, "새로운 형태의 가족: 헌법적 가능성과 한계", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.221~242 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  28. 지원림, "事實婚에 관한 약간의 비판적 고찰", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.461~494 (2008), 한국가족법학회
  29. 최신덕, "계층별로 결혼행동에 나타난 여성역할. in: 이화여자대학교논총" (1980), 이화여자대학교출판부
  30. 한국가정법률상담소, "사실혼의 실태 및 의식에 관한 조사", 변화하는 사회와 사실혼의 법적 보호 심포지엄 (2007)
  31. 한봉희, "미국법에 있어서 혼외동서의 법리", 법학연구, (12) (1985), 전북대학교출판부
  32. Agell, Anders, "Cohabitation Without Marriage in Swedish Law, in Marriage in Contemporary Societies" (1980), Butterworths
  33. Boele-Woelke. K., "Registered Partnership: Legislation of the Netherlands. in: Current Problems in the Law of Persons" (1999), CIEC
  34. Crane, Daniel A., "Abolishing Civil Marriage: A ‘Judeo-Christian’ Argument for Peivatizing Marriage", Law Review, 27(3) (2006), Cardozo Law School
  35. Dethloff, N, "Die Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft-Ein Neues Famielienrechtliches Institut", NJW, 36 (2001)
  36. Godard, Joe¨lle, "PACS 7years On; Is It Moving Toward Marriage?", International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 21 (2007)
  37. Kiernan, Kathleen, "Cohabitation in Western in Just Living Together" (2002), Taylor & Francis e-Library
  38. Stake, Jeffrey Evans, "Paternalism in the Law of Marriage" (1999), Indiana Law Review
  39. 古川瑛子, "事実婚の法的保護と内縁保護法理についての一考察", 岡山大学大学院 社会文化科学研究科紀要, (27) (2009)
  40. 久貴忠彦, "親族法" (1984), 日本評論社
  41. 大村敦志, "家族法 (第2版 補訂版)" (2004), 有斐閣
  42. 鈴木禄弥, "親族法講義" (1988), 創文社
  43. 武井正臣, "内縁婚の現状と課題" (1991), 法律文化社
  44. 水野紀子, "内縁準婚理論と事実婚の保護. in: 『広中俊雄先生傘寿記念論集』法と生成と民法の体系" (2006), 創文社
  45. 二宮周平, "日本民法の展開(3) 判例の法形成-內緣. in: 日本民法典の百年" (1998), 有斐閣
  46. 二宮周平, "事実婚の判例総合解説" (2006), 信山社
  47. 二宮周平, "事実婚の現代的課題" (1990), 日本評論社
  48. 泉久雄, "內緣問題に思う. in: 現代家族法の諸課題と展望" (1982), 有斐閣
  49. 川井健, "事實婚の保護. in: 現代家族法大系 二卷" (1980), 有斐閣
  50. 内田貴, "民法 Ⅳ —親族相續法" (2004), 東京大学出版会
  51. 太田武男, "現代の内縁問題" (1996), 有斐閣
  52. 太田武男, "事實婚の比較法的硏究" (1986), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)