事實婚制度에 대한 批判的 接近 ―사실혼 개념의 발전적 극복을 위한 제언―
An Critical Approach to the Regulation of de facto Marriage
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The definition of de facto marriage means a partnership between a woman and a man willing to marry but is not yet officially accepted in Family Registration Book. Thus it is regarded as a quasi marriage. But legally it cannot be considered as a marriage with legal effects including the right to inheritance. Even though Supreme Court tends to give legal protection to de facto marriage, its importance can be actually certified only with relation to the matrimonial case, notwithstanding affecting personal status. This fact shows that in realty the theory of de facto marriage contributes very little to the difficulties around the matters of various forms of partnerships in society. In addition to it the intention of a partner who will not apply for the registration of marriage should be respected. That is the request of private autonomy and the Art. 36 Constitution. With the changing time many different types of partnerships emerge and make the role of de facto marriage narrower, it is strongly recommended to build a unified legal concept with which we can regulate and solve legal problems rising from new legal phenomena. The best solution is naturally the way of legistration.
Abstract
The definition of de facto marriage means a partnership between a woman and a man willing to marry but is not yet officially accepted in Family Registration Book. Thus it is regarded as a quasi marriage. But legally it cannot be considered as a marriage with legal effects including the right to inheritance. Even though Supreme Court tends to give legal protection to de facto marriage, its importance can be actually certified only with relation to the matrimonial case, notwithstanding affecting personal status. This fact shows that in realty the theory of de facto marriage contributes very little to the difficulties around the matters of various forms of partnerships in society. In addition to it the intention of a partner who will not apply for the registration of marriage should be respected. That is the request of private autonomy and the Art. 36 Constitution. With the changing time many different types of partnerships emerge and make the role of de facto marriage narrower, it is strongly recommended to build a unified legal concept with which we can regulate and solve legal problems rising from new legal phenomena. The best solution is naturally the way of legistration.
참고문헌 (31)
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2002)
- 김상용, "자녀의 유류분권과 배우자상속분에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 민사법학, (36), pp.669~708 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 김상준, "혼외가족의 법률문제 — 사실혼관계를 중심으로 —", 민사판례연구, 18, pp.525~552 (1996)
- 김시철, "일방 당사자의 사망으로 인하여 사실혼관계가 종료된 경우 그 상대방에게 재산분할청구권을 인정할 수 있는지", 대법원판례해설, 통권 : 61, pp.481~499 (2006)
- ), "가족법학논총", 1991, 175~191
- 김용한, "신친족상속법론" (2002)
- 김주수, "족법, 제9판" (2009)
- 김형배, "채권각론 <계약법>" (2001)
- 박동섭, "친족상속법, 제3판" (2009)
- 박병호, "가족법" (1991)
- 박인환, "死亡에 의한 事實婚의 解消와 財産分割의 類推", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.161~206 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 박인환, "事實婚保護法理의 變遷과 課題 ―事實婚의 發生類型과 保護의 個別化―", 가족법연구, 23(1), pp.133~186 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 박종용, "사실혼배우자의 보호―특히 사망으로 인한 혼인해소의 경우를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.139~160 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 배경숙, (2004)
- 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2004)
- "재판자료", 2003, 309~362
- 신영호, "가족관계등록법" (2009)
- ), "가족법학논총", 1991, 193~205
- 윤진수, "事實婚配偶者 一方이 사망한 경우의 財産問題", 저스티스, (100), pp.5~39 (2007), 한국법학원
- 이경희, "가족법 (친족법·상속법)" (2008)
- 이화숙, "가족법상의 법률행위에 있어서의 의사와 신고", 민사법학, (36), pp.613~644 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 전혜정, "등기례에 나타난 부부재산계약의 내용", 가족법연구, 20(1), pp.1~41 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 정광현, "신친족상속법요론" (1958)
- 조규창, "동거녀의 재산분할청구권 —서울가정법원판결의 분석적 고찰—", 논리와 직관, pp.519~535 (1998)
- 조은희, "배우자 법정상속의 강화에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.145~174 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 지원림, "事實婚에 관한 약간의 비판적 고찰", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.461~494 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- "Ko¨tz H.,, Deliktsrecht, 7. Aufl", ~ (1996)
- "Bu¨rgerliches, Gesetzbuch, Kommentar, bearb. v. Berger", Jauernig, Stadler, pp.Stürner, Teichmann, 13. Aufl., 2009 (Jauernig[DOI]
- Proff, M., "Tod des nichtehelichen Partners und Vermo¨gensausgleich", pp.980~983 (2010), NJW
- "Rauscher Th., Familienrecht, 2. Aufl", ~ (2008)
- Schwenzer I., "Familie und Recht (Ausgewa¨hlte Beitra¨ge aus 25 Jahren)", ~ (2010)