특별수익, 유류분 그리고 재혼
A Study on Relations between Special Profit, Legally Secured Portion and Remarriage
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If husband gives inheritance to his sons and daughter, before he remarried, could wife have a right for return the inheritance that was given to husband’s sons and daughter? There is no prescription about that problem in Korea. Recently Seoul Family Court made a decision about the right of wife in the same case. The court sentenced that the wife has a right for return the inheritance to husband’s sons and daughter. Theories and precedent insist that wife’s right to overtake the inheritance is permitted for balance between successors. In that point of view the court made acceptable decision. But I think the decision has some problems. The wife was not successor when husband gave inheritance to his sons and daughter. So she has no expectation about the inheritance that was given to husband’s sons and daughter. Therefore she has no right to overtake the property. In the same reason she has no right to demand the legally secured portion.
Abstract
If husband gives inheritance to his sons and daughter, before he remarried, could wife have a right for return the inheritance that was given to husband’s sons and daughter? There is no prescription about that problem in Korea. Recently Seoul Family Court made a decision about the right of wife in the same case. The court sentenced that the wife has a right for return the inheritance to husband’s sons and daughter. Theories and precedent insist that wife’s right to overtake the inheritance is permitted for balance between successors. In that point of view the court made acceptable decision. But I think the decision has some problems. The wife was not successor when husband gave inheritance to his sons and daughter. So she has no expectation about the inheritance that was given to husband’s sons and daughter. Therefore she has no right to overtake the property. In the same reason she has no right to demand the legally secured portion.
참고문헌 (23)
- 곽윤직, "상속법(개정판)" (2004), 박영사
- 김용한, "친족상속법(보정판)" (2003), 박영사
- 김주수, "친족상속법(제9판)" (2010), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법(3정판)" (2009), 박영사
- 서울가정법원, "가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집Ⅱ" (2005)
- 송덕수, "신민법강의(제3판)" (2010), 박영사
- 이경희, "가족법(5정판)" (2006), 법지사
- 이은영, "민법Ⅱ(제5판)" (2005), 박영사
- 이은정, "특별수익 반환의 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1996
- 정구태, "유류분제도의 법적 구조에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 김영심, "유류분반환청구권 관련 소고(小考)", 서강법학연구, 10(2), pp.177~199 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김은아, "민법상 유류분의 제도적 의의 －연혁적 고찰을 중심으로－", 법학논총, 26(1), pp.567~587 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박영규, "유류분 반환청구권의 법적 성질과 행사기간", 외법논집, 34(2), pp.93~109 (2010), 법학연구소
- 변동열, "유류분제도", 민사판례연구, 25 (2003), 민사판례연구회
- 윤진수, "유류분 침해액의 산정방법", 서울대학교 법학, 48(3), pp.250~277 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이승우, "피상속인의 의사와 상속인의 보호", 성균관법학, 18(3), pp.287~304 (2006), 법학연구소
- 이은정, "민법 제1008조의 해석에 있어서 특별수익의 개념과 그 범위", 안암법학, (4) (1996)
- 이은정, "특별수익의 반환기준에 관한 재검토", 가족법연구, (10) (1996), 한국가족법학회
- 정구태, "遺留分 侵害額의 算定方法에 관한 小考 - 相續에 의해 取得한 積極財産額의 算定方法을 중심으로 -", 고려법학, (51), pp.439~484 (2008), 법학연구원
- 정구태, "遺留分返還請求權의 法的 性質에 대한 試論的 考察", 동아법학, (42), pp.229~272 (2008), 법학연구소
- 정구태, "유류분제도의 존재이유에 대한 현대적 조명 -유류분제도 비판론에 대한 비판적 검토-", 법학논총, 33(2), pp.709~736 (2009), 법학연구소
- 정소민, "유류분반환청구권에 관한 고찰 - 법적 성질 및 시효 소멸에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -", 외법논집, (30), pp.127~167 (2008), 법학연구소
- 정현수, "亡夫의 凍結精子에 의한 人工受精子의 法的 地位", 성균관법학, 18(2), pp.343~368 (2006), 법학연구소