실질적 특유재산에 대한 재산분할
Separate Property in the Division of Matrimonial Property
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the division of matrimonial property at divorce, the properties which were acquired by cooperation of both parties should be divided. Then should separate property be divided, too? Separate property means the property which one party owned before the marriage or inherited or was given from the third party during the marriage. There are many cases in which division of separate property mattered. However, there is not much discussion on this problem. Nor is the judicial practice settled. The precedent of the Korean Supreme Court declared that separate property can be divided if the partner of the owner actively cooperated the maintenance of it and prevented the diminution of value or increased the value. In some cases, the Supreme Court acknowledged the division when the other partner simply did the household labor. The division of matrimonial property has 2 elements. One is an element of liquidation. The other is an element of support. From the perspective of the liquidation, the household labor itself should not be regarded as cooperation of the marital property. However, from the perspective of the spousal support after the divorce, the separate property can be divided if the division of the marital property was not enough for the spousal support.
Abstract
In the division of matrimonial property at divorce, the properties which were acquired by cooperation of both parties should be divided. Then should separate property be divided, too? Separate property means the property which one party owned before the marriage or inherited or was given from the third party during the marriage. There are many cases in which division of separate property mattered. However, there is not much discussion on this problem. Nor is the judicial practice settled. The precedent of the Korean Supreme Court declared that separate property can be divided if the partner of the owner actively cooperated the maintenance of it and prevented the diminution of value or increased the value. In some cases, the Supreme Court acknowledged the division when the other partner simply did the household labor. The division of matrimonial property has 2 elements. One is an element of liquidation. The other is an element of support. From the perspective of the liquidation, the household labor itself should not be regarded as cooperation of the marital property. However, from the perspective of the spousal support after the divorce, the separate property can be divided if the division of the marital property was not enough for the spousal support.
참고문헌 (26)
- 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" (2022), 박영사
- 송인우, "주석친족법 제1권", pp.356~ (2020), 한국사법행정학회
- 이동진, "주해친족법 제1권", pp.374~ (2015), 박영사
- 최은정, "재산분할의 기준 정립을 위한 방안 연구" (2016), 사법정책연구원
- 구회근, "이혼시 부부 일방의 특유재산이 재산분할의 대상이 되는지 여부", 법조, 46(4) (1997)
- 김수정, "이혼으로 인한 재산분할청구권", 사법논집, 40 (2005)
- 김영식, "재산분할청구의 부양적 측면에 관한 고찰", 사법논집, 62 (2016)
- 민유숙, "재산분할의 구체적 인정범위", 재판자료, 62 (1993)
- 민유숙, "외국의 부부재산제도와 재산분할제도 및 부양제도: 미국법을 중심으로", 사법논집, 31 (2000)
- 민유숙, "2013년 친족·상속법 중요 판례", 인권과 정의, (440), pp.49~63 (2014), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 박홍래, "미국의 부부재산제도", 인권과 정의, (334), pp.158~173 (2004), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
- 서종희, "청산적 재산분할과 부양적 재산분할의 독립과 ‘2분의 1 원칙’에 대한 재고 -Miller v.Miller 사건과 오오무라 아츠시(大村敦志)의 입법제안의 시사점-", 법학논총, 20(2), pp.119~146 (2013), 법학연구원
- 윤진수, "민법논고 제7권" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "민법논고 제8권" (2021), 박영사
- 이동진, "혼인관념, 인적 혼인의무 및 그 위반에 대한 제재", 서울대학교 법학, 53(3), pp.483~531 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이선미, "2015년도 가사재판실무 법관연수 자료"
- 함윤식, "이혼에 따른 재산분할에 관한 판례의 최근 동향", 민사판례연구, (38), pp.1169~1269 (2016), 민사판례연구회
- 현영수, "2021년 한국가족법학회‧서울가정법원 공동연구회 자료집" (2021)
- 홍승희, "이혼시 재산분할에 관한 미국의 법률과 판례 분석", 원광법학, 37(1), pp.93~134 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 犬伏由子, "新版 注釋民法 (22)" (2008), 有斐閣
- 犬伏由子, "新注釋民法 (17)", 有斐閣
- The American Law Institute, "Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations" (2002), The American Law Institute
- John De Witt Gregory, "Understanding Family Law" (2001), LexisNexis
- Sanford N. Katz, "Family Law in America" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Brett R. Turner, "1 Equitable Distribution of Property" (2021), Thomson Reuters
- J. Thomas Oldham, "Should Separate Property Gradually Become Community Property as a Marriage Continues?", Louisiana Law Review, 72, pp.127~ (2011)