자의 복리를 위한 친양자제도
Full Adoption's System for the welfare of the child
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the conventional adoption system of Korea, an adopted child could not use his or her adoptive father's surname. As an adoption should have been disclosed by the documents that prove the family relationship, people had been reluctant to use an adoption. Even there were cases that some adopted children were reported just as the legitimate children. So, jurists and civil society argued that "For the welfare of the child, we should make a system that terminates the relationship between the adopted child and the natural parents, and generates the parent-child relationship between the adoptive parents and the adopted child." July 20, 1998, for the first time, the Department of Justice tried to enact the law on the full adoption system. As the 15th Congressional term expired May 29, 2000, the law was discarded automatically. Then, on October 16, 2000, the Department of Justice submitted Civil Code amendments to the National Assembly and on March 2, 2005, the proposed amendments of the Civil Code were passed by the National Assembly. And from January 1, 2008, the full adoption system was performed. However, it has been criticized that there is a limit to realize the intent of the full adoption system because the Civil Code requires full adoption requirements too strictly. Thus, the revision of the Civil Code of 2012 mitigates full adoption requirements as follows: First, the child to be adopted shall be a minor which means under the age of nineteen, not fifteen. Second, a request to the Family Court for full adoption may be accepted without the consent or approval of the natural parents in each case of the following conditions: 1) where the child’s agent by law has refused consent or approval without a justifiable reason, 2) where the natural parents with their own fault do not fulfill the child support obligations and visitation for three years or more, 3) where the natural parents has abused or deserted the adopted child or otherwise has severely impaired the welfare of the adopted child. But in the full adoption system of the Civil Code, there are some problems which need to be improved.
Abstract
According to the conventional adoption system of Korea, an adopted child could not use his or her adoptive father's surname. As an adoption should have been disclosed by the documents that prove the family relationship, people had been reluctant to use an adoption. Even there were cases that some adopted children were reported just as the legitimate children. So, jurists and civil society argued that "For the welfare of the child, we should make a system that terminates the relationship between the adopted child and the natural parents, and generates the parent-child relationship between the adoptive parents and the adopted child." July 20, 1998, for the first time, the Department of Justice tried to enact the law on the full adoption system. As the 15th Congressional term expired May 29, 2000, the law was discarded automatically. Then, on October 16, 2000, the Department of Justice submitted Civil Code amendments to the National Assembly and on March 2, 2005, the proposed amendments of the Civil Code were passed by the National Assembly. And from January 1, 2008, the full adoption system was performed. However, it has been criticized that there is a limit to realize the intent of the full adoption system because the Civil Code requires full adoption requirements too strictly. Thus, the revision of the Civil Code of 2012 mitigates full adoption requirements as follows: First, the child to be adopted shall be a minor which means under the age of nineteen, not fifteen. Second, a request to the Family Court for full adoption may be accepted without the consent or approval of the natural parents in each case of the following conditions: 1) where the child’s agent by law has refused consent or approval without a justifiable reason, 2) where the natural parents with their own fault do not fulfill the child support obligations and visitation for three years or more, 3) where the natural parents has abused or deserted the adopted child or otherwise has severely impaired the welfare of the adopted child. But in the full adoption system of the Civil Code, there are some problems which need to be improved.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김상용, "가족법연구 III" (2010), 법문사
- 김성숙, "사회변동과 한국가족법" (2008), 나남
- 김주수, "친족상속법" (2012), 법문사
- 김형배, "민법학강의" (2012), 신조사
- 명순구, "프랑스민법전" (2004), 법문사
- 송덕수, "신민법강의" (2011), 박영사
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2010), 세창출판사
- 윤대성, "가족법강의" (2010), 한국학술정보
- 이화숙, "사회와 가족법" (2012), 세창출판사
- 전대규, "중국민법(하)" (2009), 법률정보센타
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2012), 홍문사
- 고형석, "친양자제도에 관한 연구", 저스티스, 108, pp.54~74 (2008), 한국법학원
- 국가인권위원회, "유엔 아동의 권리에 관한 협약 제21조의 유보철회 및 이행에 대한 권고", ~ (2005)
- 국회법제사법위원회, "민법개정안 공청회자료 법무부 의견", ~ (1993)
- 권정희, "양자법의 정비를 위한 검토-친양자제도의 입법안을 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.2~84 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 대법원, "정보공개청구(종합민원과-1235)에 대한 공개내용", ~ (2012)
- 민병로, "헌법상 자기결정권과 후견주의", 법학논총, 32(1), pp.149~174 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 법률신문, "입양, 법원허가 있어야…, 파양, 재판절차 거쳐야", ~ (2011)
- 법무부, "민법 일부개정법률안", ~ (2011)
- 법제처, "민법일부개정법률 개정이유", ~ (2005)
- 안재진, "국내법에 나타난 입양제도의 변천과정 분석: 아동권리의 관점에서", 한국가족복지학, 16(4), pp.71~95 (2011), 한국가족복지학회
- 이병화, "친양자제도의 도입에 따른 주요문제에 관한 고찰", 비교사법, 9(1)통권 : 16 (2002), 한국비교사법학회
- 이승우, "친양자제도 관견", 성균관법학, 19(2), pp.175~190 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이회규, "친양자법(안)에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, 15(2)통권 : 16 (2001), 한국가족법학회
- 이효진, "양자법의 문제점과 개정방향―민법상의 쟁점을 중심으로", 입양관련 법과 제도개선 심포지엄 (2009), 한국가정법률상담소
- 정철근, "친권상실과 자의 복리에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2002
- 조경애, "친양자 제도의 개선방향(사례를 중심으로)", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.305~336 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 추호경, "민법개정안 공청회 진술서", 국회법제사법위원회, 민법개정안공청회자료집 제1주제 친족편, ~ (1999)
- 입양법제 선진화방안, "현소혜", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 홍춘의, "친족법에서의 자의 복리개념", 민사법학, (36), pp.645~668 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 大村敦志, "家族法" (2002), 有斐閣
