본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

入養制度의 法規定 整備에 관한 提言

A Legal Study on Adoption

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Civil Law stepped into the way of the full-adoption in Korea. That is, the adoptee by the full-adoption is regarded as ‘the child born among the marriage of the adoptive parents’. And the former relationship by blood and marriage is cut off. However, the full-adoption can be done in the child who is under 15 years old. More over, it's possible in case the adoptive parents desires that. It's doubtful if there is the effect that introduces the full-adoption as expected. The basic cause of this situation is maintaining the system of the general adoption-centered as a principle, and it was due to introduce the full-adoption exceptionally. According to the amendment of Civil Law by government, the permission of a family court has to be gotten to adopt the minor. However, the former relationship by blood and marriage is not cut off, it continues to exist still, and a surname of birth parents is continuously used. Therefore, the double measure is applied to the protection of the adoptees still in their minority by the law. If the adoptive system is understand as the social policy system for the welfare of the child, it shouldn’t depend on the international adoption any more. The domestic adoption has to be activated. In order to achieve this object, the consciousness of the people has to be changed and the social supporting systems like Civil Law and Special Adoption Act have to be revised. The full-adoption was adopted partially just now. All adoptees still in their minority must be protected and brought up like real children discriminately by applying the full-adoption. This is a main point of revision.

Abstract

Civil Law stepped into the way of the full-adoption in Korea. That is, the adoptee by the full-adoption is regarded as ‘the child born among the marriage of the adoptive parents’. And the former relationship by blood and marriage is cut off. However, the full-adoption can be done in the child who is under 15 years old. More over, it's possible in case the adoptive parents desires that. It's doubtful if there is the effect that introduces the full-adoption as expected. The basic cause of this situation is maintaining the system of the general adoption-centered as a principle, and it was due to introduce the full-adoption exceptionally. According to the amendment of Civil Law by government, the permission of a family court has to be gotten to adopt the minor. However, the former relationship by blood and marriage is not cut off, it continues to exist still, and a surname of birth parents is continuously used. Therefore, the double measure is applied to the protection of the adoptees still in their minority by the law. If the adoptive system is understand as the social policy system for the welfare of the child, it shouldn’t depend on the international adoption any more. The domestic adoption has to be activated. In order to achieve this object, the consciousness of the people has to be changed and the social supporting systems like Civil Law and Special Adoption Act have to be revised. The full-adoption was adopted partially just now. All adoptees still in their minority must be protected and brought up like real children discriminately by applying the full-adoption. This is a main point of revision.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 권정희, "양자법의 정비를 위한 검토-친양자제도의 입법안을 중심으로", 가족법연구, 16(1), pp.2~84 (2002), 한국가족법학회
  2. 김상용, "『입양촉진 및 절차에 관한 특례법』의 개선방향 ― 국내입양을 중심으로 ―", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.217~256 (2009), 한국가족법학회
  3. 김상용, "허위의 친생자 출생신고에 의하여 입양의 효력이 발생한 경우 양자의 인지청구 허용여부—대상판결:대법원 2000.1.28. 선고 99므1817 판결", 가족법연구, (14) (2000)
  4. 김주수, "판례가족법" (1983), 박영사
  5. 김주수, "친족상속법" (2006), 법문사
  6. 김효진, "유엔 아동권리협약 제21조(a) 유보철회 방안1) -입양허가제 도입을 중심으로", 아동과 권리, 15(2), pp.141~160 (2011), 한국아동권리학회
  7. 박정기, "가족법(제2판)" (2008), 삼영사
  8. 송두용, "韓國法制史考" (1985), 진명문화사
  9. 우병창, "가족법상 입양에 관한 연구-양자법의 개선을 위한 현행법의 검토와 입법론 제안", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.6~202 (2002), 한국가족법학회
  10. 이경희, "허위친생자출생신고와 입양의 효력", 사법행정 (1992)
  11. 이경희, "가족법" (2004), 법원사
  12. 최봉경, "입양제도가 필요한가? ―입양의 필연성 또는 합목적성에 대한 비교법적 연구―", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.537~552 (2008), 한국가족법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)