본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

개정 「민법」상 입양과 「입양특례법」상 입양 —체계정합성의 관점에서—

Adoption under the revised Civil Law and the Special Adoption Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Some articles concerning adoption in Korean Civil Law and the Special Adoption Act have been recently revised. But unfortunately those two statutes become in consistent because of the difference of the primary department and the gap of time for revision. For example, those who want to adopt a child under the application of the Special Adoption Act can also choose an adoption or a full adoption under the Civil Law, and thereby they can escape from rigorous requirement of the Special Adoption Act. Furthermore, on the one hand an adoption under the Civil Law becomes effective by an adoption report under the Act on the Registration, etc. of Family Relationship, on the other hand an adoption under the Special Adoption Act becomes effective at the same time with the final and conclusive adjudication which has admitted an adoption claim. Consequently children who has been adopted by foreign parents cannot be protected properly when adoptive parents reject to take over the child after the adoption adjudication. It is not clear either, whether an adoption without adjudication under the Special Adoption Act is null and void, or not, because the new Special Adoption Act just provides that the articles concerning adoption in Korean Civil Law shall apply mutatis mutandis without specifying whether those articles are related to a normal adoption or a full adoption. Besides, a provision about the consent exemption in case of missing of a legal representative is left out in full adotion, and a provision about the consent exemption in case of unjustifiable rejection in adoption under the Special Adoption Act, either. The revised Civil Law and the Special Adoption Act surely has opened a new horizon of the area of adoption, but we cannot deny that they have a lot to be improved.

Abstract

Some articles concerning adoption in Korean Civil Law and the Special Adoption Act have been recently revised. But unfortunately those two statutes become in consistent because of the difference of the primary department and the gap of time for revision. For example, those who want to adopt a child under the application of the Special Adoption Act can also choose an adoption or a full adoption under the Civil Law, and thereby they can escape from rigorous requirement of the Special Adoption Act. Furthermore, on the one hand an adoption under the Civil Law becomes effective by an adoption report under the Act on the Registration, etc. of Family Relationship, on the other hand an adoption under the Special Adoption Act becomes effective at the same time with the final and conclusive adjudication which has admitted an adoption claim. Consequently children who has been adopted by foreign parents cannot be protected properly when adoptive parents reject to take over the child after the adoption adjudication. It is not clear either, whether an adoption without adjudication under the Special Adoption Act is null and void, or not, because the new Special Adoption Act just provides that the articles concerning adoption in Korean Civil Law shall apply mutatis mutandis without specifying whether those articles are related to a normal adoption or a full adoption. Besides, a provision about the consent exemption in case of missing of a legal representative is left out in full adotion, and a provision about the consent exemption in case of unjustifiable rejection in adoption under the Special Adoption Act, either. The revised Civil Law and the Special Adoption Act surely has opened a new horizon of the area of adoption, but we cannot deny that they have a lot to be improved.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김주수, "친족ㆍ상속법" (2011), 法文社
  2. 헤이그국제아동입양협약에 관한 연구, "석광현", 법무부, ~ (2010)
  3. 신창섭, "국제사법" (2007), 세창출판사
  4. , 1995
  5. 법무부, "제3기 가족법개정 특별분과위원회 회의록", ~ (2011)
  6. , 2010
  7. 權貞姬, "入養法의 竝行的 立法論", 家族法硏究, (7) (1993)
  8. 金相瑢, "虛僞의 親生子 出生申告에 의하여 入養의 효력이 발생한 경우 養子의 認知請求 허용여부", 家族法硏究, (14) (2000)
  9. 金相瑢, "개정민법(친족ㆍ상속법) 해설, In 家族法硏究 II" (2005), 法文社
  10. 金相瑢, "양자법의 문제점과 개정방향 ―민법상의 쟁점을 중심으로―, In 家族法硏究 III" (2010), 法文社
  11. 金相瑢, "「입양촉진및절차에관한특례법」의 개선방향 ―국내입양을 중심으로―, In 家族法 硏究 III" (2010), 法文社
  12. 金相瑢, "개정 양자법 해설", 法曹, 668 (2012)
  13. 김상용, "개정 「입양특례법」의 특징", 법률신문, (4050) (2012)
  14. 金昌姬, "養子制度에 관한 硏究: 入養의 成立과 效果를 中心으로", 박사, 사법, pp.1986
  15. 우병창, "가족법상 입양에 관한 연구-양자법의 개선을 위한 현행법의 검토와 입법론 제안-", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.6~202 (2002), 한국가족법학회
  16. 尹眞秀, "兒童權利協約과 韓國 家族法, In 「民法論攷」 IV" (2009), 博英社
  17. 이병화, "입양아동의 국제적 보호", 국제법학회논총, 48(2), pp.5~164 (2003), 대한국제법학회
  18. 李勝雨, "친양자제도 소고", 亞細亞女性法學, (2) (1999)
  19. 이현재, "미국 입양법에 있어서 혼외부의 헌법적 권리에 관한 고찰", 民事法硏究, 15(1) (2007)
  20. 李會圭, "親養子法(案)에 관한 考察", 家族法硏究, 15(2) (2001)
  21. 장복희, "국제입양에 관한 헤이그협약과 국내입양법의 개선", 저스티스, (93), pp.221~235 (2006), 한국법학원
  22. 최진섭, "입양에 관한 판례의 쟁점 분석", 법학연구, 21(3), pp.193~224 (2011), 법학연구원
  23. 현소혜, "익명입양 제도의 문제점과 대응방안", 민사법학, 50, pp.547~594 (2010), 한국민사법학회
  24. Rainer Frank, "입양제도가 필요한가? ―입양의 필연성 또는 합목적성에 대한 비교법적 연구―", 가족법연구, 22(3), pp.537~552 (2008), 한국가족법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)