현행법상 배우자 재산상속제도의 개선방안에 관하여
A Study on the Effective Improvement Plan for the espousal inheritance system under the current Civil Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Entering the 21st century, today’s family structure has changed into a nuclear family which is focused around the married couples. That is the social trend which is triggered by the fact that young people don’t support their parents anymore. Therefore the inheritance is mostly made up of the assets acquired by joint efforts through divided roles between married couples during their marriage. From this point of view, the theory of the modern inheritance system is entering into espousal inheritance oriented system away from the bloodline family oriented inheritance system. According to the current inheritance legislation, when a married couple put an end to their marriage including one’s death, the acquired assets of the couple through into effort of the couple during their marriage is divided among heirs as inheritance by the inheritance legislation without any prior liquidation proceedings based upon a married couple asset system. Therefore the surviving spouse’s his or her potential stake-inherit fortune is invaded. In addition, due to the civil law which regulates the inheritance equity, the surviving souse’s inheritance equity is only added one half of the other co-heirs, which makes the surviving spouse’s equity very instable according to the number of the co-heirs. This side effect is made by the fact that our inheritance system is staying in the old time family oriented inheritance system. The gender equality among the married couple should be respected in accordance with the theory of the equality of the married couple. Even if the title of the asset is put on the husband’s name even for the assets formed during marriage through joint efforts by married couple, the title of the asset should be presumed as the joint title of the married couple. Because the surviving spouse’s potential stake-inherit fortune should be regarded as an active role to form their joint fortune. The obligation to prove to alter the presumption should be under the person who wants to challenge it. The active legislation to approve the surviving spouse’s potential stake-inherit fortune which activated the formation of the married couple’s joint assets is deeply demanded. By this activity the husband’s labor and the wife’s support can be evaluated equally under the gender equality theory. By this activity we can correspond to the Constitution, article 36, paragraph 1 “Individual dignity and an equality of the genders on the basis of marriage and family life should be established, and the country must ensure this right.”
Abstract
Entering the 21st century, today’s family structure has changed into a nuclear family which is focused around the married couples. That is the social trend which is triggered by the fact that young people don’t support their parents anymore. Therefore the inheritance is mostly made up of the assets acquired by joint efforts through divided roles between married couples during their marriage. From this point of view, the theory of the modern inheritance system is entering into espousal inheritance oriented system away from the bloodline family oriented inheritance system. According to the current inheritance legislation, when a married couple put an end to their marriage including one’s death, the acquired assets of the couple through into effort of the couple during their marriage is divided among heirs as inheritance by the inheritance legislation without any prior liquidation proceedings based upon a married couple asset system. Therefore the surviving spouse’s his or her potential stake-inherit fortune is invaded. In addition, due to the civil law which regulates the inheritance equity, the surviving souse’s inheritance equity is only added one half of the other co-heirs, which makes the surviving spouse’s equity very instable according to the number of the co-heirs. This side effect is made by the fact that our inheritance system is staying in the old time family oriented inheritance system. The gender equality among the married couple should be respected in accordance with the theory of the equality of the married couple. Even if the title of the asset is put on the husband’s name even for the assets formed during marriage through joint efforts by married couple, the title of the asset should be presumed as the joint title of the married couple. Because the surviving spouse’s potential stake-inherit fortune should be regarded as an active role to form their joint fortune. The obligation to prove to alter the presumption should be under the person who wants to challenge it. The active legislation to approve the surviving spouse’s potential stake-inherit fortune which activated the formation of the married couple’s joint assets is deeply demanded. By this activity the husband’s labor and the wife’s support can be evaluated equally under the gender equality theory. By this activity we can correspond to the Constitution, article 36, paragraph 1 “Individual dignity and an equality of the genders on the basis of marriage and family life should be established, and the country must ensure this right.”
참고문헌 (24)
- 곽윤직, "현대민법의 과제와 전망: 남송 한봉희박사 회갑기념논문집" (1994), 밀알
- 부부재산법제 개선방안에 대한 연구, "국회법제사법위원회", 국회법사위, ~ (2009)
- 김성동, "生存配偶者의 相續權 强化에 관한 硏究 : 亡夫에 대한 遺妻의 相續權을 中心으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2013
- 김숙자, "민법전시행 삼십주년기념논문집, 민법학의 회고와 전망" (1993)
- 김안진, "친족상속법" (1950), 조문사
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김은아, "配偶者의 財産相續上 地位와 그 强化", 민사법학, (30), pp.151~182 (2005), 한국민사법학회
- 김주수, "주석민법(친족1)" (2002), 한국사법행정학회
- 김주수, "주석친족상속법" (1973), 법문사
- 박병호, "가족법" (1999), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
- 박종용, "배우자상속권에 관한 연구 : 부부재산제도를 통한 배우자상속권의 강화론", 박사, 법학, pp.2002
- 신영호, "韓國夫婦財産制の現狀と課題", 고려법학, 17(49), pp.155~174 (2007), 법학연구원
- 양수산, "친족상속법" (1998), 한국외국어대학교출판부
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2006), 학현사
- 이경희, "개정상속법의 제문제", 법조춘추, (140) (1992), 서울지방변호사회
- 李勝雨, "기여분에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.1994
- 이승우, "기여분의 요건으로서의 기여의 특별성", 가족법연구, (9) (1995), 한국가족법학회
- 이화숙, "비교부부재산관계법" (2000), 세창출판사
- 정구태, "2014년 법무부 민법개정위원회의 상속법 개정시안에 대한 비판적 斷想", 강원법학, 41, pp.987~1014 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 조미경, "민법전시행 삼십주년기념논문집" (1993), 한국민사법학회
- 조미경, "혼인중 취득한 재산과 가사노동", 판례월보 (1990)
- 조은희, "배우자 법정상속의 강화에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.145~174 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 최금숙, "양성평등과 한국법체계" (1996), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 한승협, "기여분 제도에 관한 연구", 박사, 민사법, pp.2010
