실질적 자기결정존중의 관점에서의 후견계약의 평가와 의사결정지원방안의 모색
The Evaluation of Contract for Guardianship and Measures for Supported Decision-making from the View of Substantial Respect for Self-determination
1
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The old Korean Adult Guardian System limited the legal capacity of the ward without exception and granted the adult guardian comprehensive power of attorney. Therefore, the 2013’s new Korean Adult Guardian Systems has moderated the uniformity of the exclusion of the legal capacity of the ward and has granted the possibility of the limitation of the guardian’s power of attorney. But the new consistent statutory guardianship types; full adult guardianship and limited guardianship, do not meet the criteria for the protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the CRPD. That is called by substitute decision-making system and has been faced the criticism to infringe on the autonomy and human rights of the persons with impaired decision making ability. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have strongly emphasized the change from substitute decision-making to supported decision-making in Concluding Observations on the initial report about the Republic of Korea. On the other hand, the Contract for Guardianship ;Contractual Guardianship, as an alternative system of consistent statutory guardianship, meets the requests of the CRPD in that it is based on self-determination and there is no limit of legal capacity. It reach not only economic and financial matters but also health and medical issues and other personal matters such as the place of the residence of Granter. But It is not available for th persons who are already sufficient capacity or weak at that time of contract, because it requires the legal capacity of granter. Besides, there is a risk that the attorney who is powered by the contract, may ignore the will or the hope of the granter. I propose that the supported decision-making may be performed by a notary and other persons, including family, relatives, friends, social service officials, and a social workers; in the process of concluding of contract. And I think that the advance directives, which may be written with the contract for gurdian, will be useful for knowing the will of granter who cannot express his intent any longer. The advance directives may address welfare management and other personal matters, and also economic and financial matters.
Abstract
The old Korean Adult Guardian System limited the legal capacity of the ward without exception and granted the adult guardian comprehensive power of attorney. Therefore, the 2013’s new Korean Adult Guardian Systems has moderated the uniformity of the exclusion of the legal capacity of the ward and has granted the possibility of the limitation of the guardian’s power of attorney. But the new consistent statutory guardianship types; full adult guardianship and limited guardianship, do not meet the criteria for the protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the CRPD. That is called by substitute decision-making system and has been faced the criticism to infringe on the autonomy and human rights of the persons with impaired decision making ability. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have strongly emphasized the change from substitute decision-making to supported decision-making in Concluding Observations on the initial report about the Republic of Korea. On the other hand, the Contract for Guardianship ;Contractual Guardianship, as an alternative system of consistent statutory guardianship, meets the requests of the CRPD in that it is based on self-determination and there is no limit of legal capacity. It reach not only economic and financial matters but also health and medical issues and other personal matters such as the place of the residence of Granter. But It is not available for th persons who are already sufficient capacity or weak at that time of contract, because it requires the legal capacity of granter. Besides, there is a risk that the attorney who is powered by the contract, may ignore the will or the hope of the granter. I propose that the supported decision-making may be performed by a notary and other persons, including family, relatives, friends, social service officials, and a social workers; in the process of concluding of contract. And I think that the advance directives, which may be written with the contract for gurdian, will be useful for knowing the will of granter who cannot express his intent any longer. The advance directives may address welfare management and other personal matters, and also economic and financial matters.
참고문헌 (46)
- 김재형, "민법총칙 제9판" (2013), 박영사
- 김상용, "민법총칙" (2013), 삼영사
- 김학동, "민법총칙" (2013), 박영사
- 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주해친족법 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 국가인권위원회, "장애인권리협약해설집" (2007), 한학문화
- , 제2회 성년후견 전문직단체 간담회 대한변협 성년후견소위 발제자료 (2014)
- 곽민희, "프랑스법상 성년자보호제도와 자율지원의 원칙", 法學論文集, 36(1), pp.117~163 (2012), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 권오용, "성년후견제도와 장애인인권", 한국장애인인권포럼 웹진, (26) (2013)
- 김명진, "공공후견 시행의 성과와 과제", 후견대체제도의 전망과 과제(2015년 성년후견학회 춘계학술대회 자료집) (2015)
- 김은효, "한국성년후견제도에 있어서의 후견감독인의 역할과 과제", 한국성년후견학회 주최, 후기고령사회에 있어서 고령자·장애인을 위한 권리옹호와 의사결정지원을 위한 학술회의-의사결정지원 시스템의 구축을 위하여- (2015)
- 김현진, "프랑스의 성년후견제도 —장래보호위임계약을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 26(1), pp.71~126 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 김형석, "민법 개정안에 따른 성년후견법제", 가족법연구, 24(2), pp.111~166 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 남상우, "참여인에 관한 고찰", 대한공증협회지, 통권 : 2 (2009)
- 박인환, "개정민법상 임의후견제도의 쟁점과 과제", 가족법연구, 26(2), pp.191~228 (2012), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
- 박인환, "UN장애인권리협약과 성년후견 패러다임의 전환—의사결정대행에서 의사결정지원으로—", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.171~220 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 박인환, "고령인지장애인의 인권보호와 성년후견", 저스티스, 146(1), pp.5~44 (2015), 한국법학원
- 백승흠, "개정민법의 후견계약제도와 과제 - 일본의 임의후견계약제도와 비교하여 -", 원광법학, 28(4), pp.31~60 (2012), 법학연구소
- 오호철, "임의후견제도 개선에 관한 고찰", 비교사법, 20(4), pp.1273~1298 (2013), 한국비교사법학회
- 이영규, "임의후견제도의 활성화방안", 한양법학, 25(3), pp.77~102 (2014), 한양법학회
- 이영규, "후견계약", 강원법학, 41, pp.859~893 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 이지은, "임의후견제도의 활용 및 전망에 관한 소고", 성년후견, 1 (2013)
- 제철웅, "개정 민법상의 후견계약의 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방향 :후견대체제도의 관점을 중심으로", 민사법학, 66, pp.99~134 (2014), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "캐나다 브리티시 콜롬비아주의 의사결정능력장애인의 사법상의 권리 실현 보장체계에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 21(4), pp.1561~1602 (2014), 한국비교사법학회
- 조성혜, "발달장애인을 위한 후견계약과 개선과제", 노동법논총, 32, pp.269~306 (2014), 한국비교노동법학회
- 최현태, "임의후견계약의 문제점과 법정책적 제언", 법학논고, (44), pp.183~212 (2013), 법학연구원
- 현소혜, "스위스의 성년후견제도", 비교사법, 19(2), pp.627~666 (2012), 한국비교사법학회[DOI]
- "任意後見制度に関する改善提言" (2009)[URL]
- 最高裁判所事務總局家庭局, "成年後見關係事件槪況" (2014)
- 菅富美枝, "イギリス成年後見制度にみる自立支援の法理" (2010), ミネルブア書房
- 北野俊光, "任後見契約における本人の意思実現のための留意点", 実践成年後見, (45) (2013)
- 山崎政俊, "相談から任意後見契約の締結までの実務と注意点", 実践成年後見, (45) (2013)
- 上山泰, "任意後見契約の優越的地位の限界について", 筑波ロー·ジャーナル, (11) (2012)
- 上山泰, "法定後見·任意後見·自己決定支援(意思決定支援)-2009年歐州評議會閣僚委員會勸告の紹介を含めて", 実践成年後見, (45) (2013)
- 上山泰, "現行成年後見制度と障害のある人の権利に関する条約12条の整合性, 成年後見制度の新たなグランドデザイン" (2013), 法政大学出版部
- 上山泰, "成年後見制度の理念的基礎, 成年後見制度の新たなグランドデザイン" (2013), 法政大学出版部
- 小林昭彦, "新成年後見制度の解說" (2000), 金融財政事情硏究會
- 新井誠, "任意後見制度の存在意義·再考世界の潮流を踏まえて-", 実践成年後見, (45) (2013)
- "General comment No. 1" (2014)[URL]
- "Concluding observations on the initial report of the Republic of Korea adopted by the Committee at its twelfth session" (2014)[URL]
- "Principles concerning continuing powers of attorney and advance directives for incapacity"[URL]
- "Principles concerning the legal protection of incapable adults: Recommendation Rec" (1999)[URL]
- Jürgens, "Betreuungsrecht Kommentar" (2014), C.H.Beck
- Pietsch, "Comparative Perspectives on Adult Guardianship" (2014), Carolina Academic Press
- Walter Zimmermann, "Vorsorgevollmacht Betreuungsverfügung Patientenverfügung" (2010), Erlich Schmidt Verlag
- Dagmar Coester-Waltjen, "健康配慮と患者による指定, ドイツとヨーロッパの私法と手続法" (2013), 日本評論社