성년후견과 신탁: 새로운 관계설정의 모색
Adult Guardianship and Trusts: Seeking a new relationship
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As a study on legal systems, this article proposes to set up a new legal principle of the relation between adult guardianship and trusts, which is able to explain relevant social and legal phenomena, while it does not intend to explain social phenomena prevalent in the area of adult guardianship and trusts. This kind of studies should be based on research methods of social science and is intended to suggest a new social and legal rule to purposedly change social phenomena. In other words, policies and legislative measures suggested by the study are based on the proper methods of social science. This article premises that Korean government including judiciary, as a ratifying state of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, shall be obliged to improve the adult guardianship system to the direction of supported decision making schemes. Based on such an international obligation, this article suggests that trust schemes should be utilized on the way to the introduction and settlement of supported decision making system. To prove this suggestion, this article argues that adult guardianship system should be transformed to a supported decision making scheme, which UN Committee on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has urged ratifying states to develop on the basis of Article 12 of CRPD. As supported decision making schemes are evolving, some vacancy of property managements of persons with impairments to decision making abilities must take place, which, this article argues, can be filled by trusts. Whereas trusts has traditionally alternated the necessities of adult guardianship, this article argues that trusts should be placed in the center of the property managements of the persons with impairments to decision making disabilities; that, on the contrary, adult guardianship should be resorted to as supplements to trusts. For the purpose of managing property of those persons, this article argues that the purpose of trusts should be to safely and continuously spend their property in accordance with their present and future needs of daily expenditure, care and medical treatments; that civil trusts would be much better positioned to meet such needs rather than commercial trusts run by financial institutions.
Abstract
As a study on legal systems, this article proposes to set up a new legal principle of the relation between adult guardianship and trusts, which is able to explain relevant social and legal phenomena, while it does not intend to explain social phenomena prevalent in the area of adult guardianship and trusts. This kind of studies should be based on research methods of social science and is intended to suggest a new social and legal rule to purposedly change social phenomena. In other words, policies and legislative measures suggested by the study are based on the proper methods of social science. This article premises that Korean government including judiciary, as a ratifying state of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, shall be obliged to improve the adult guardianship system to the direction of supported decision making schemes. Based on such an international obligation, this article suggests that trust schemes should be utilized on the way to the introduction and settlement of supported decision making system. To prove this suggestion, this article argues that adult guardianship system should be transformed to a supported decision making scheme, which UN Committee on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has urged ratifying states to develop on the basis of Article 12 of CRPD. As supported decision making schemes are evolving, some vacancy of property managements of persons with impairments to decision making abilities must take place, which, this article argues, can be filled by trusts. Whereas trusts has traditionally alternated the necessities of adult guardianship, this article argues that trusts should be placed in the center of the property managements of the persons with impairments to decision making disabilities; that, on the contrary, adult guardianship should be resorted to as supplements to trusts. For the purpose of managing property of those persons, this article argues that the purpose of trusts should be to safely and continuously spend their property in accordance with their present and future needs of daily expenditure, care and medical treatments; that civil trusts would be much better positioned to meet such needs rather than commercial trusts run by financial institutions.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김성우, "한국 후견제도의 운영과 가정법원의 역할", 법조, 66(2), pp.123~160 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김재승, "신탁과 관련된 상속세․증여세문제와 Estate Planning 도구로서 신탁의 이용가능성", 조세법연구, 17(3), pp.42~89 (2011), 한국세법학회
- 김판기, "고령화 사회에 있어서 재산관리와 승계수단으로서의 신탁 - 유언신탁과 유언대용신탁을 부가하여 -", 동아법학, (55), pp.201~225 (2012), 법학연구소
- 전병주, "일본 성년후견인의 부정행위와 한국에서의 함의", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(8), pp.141~151 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 제철웅, "성년후견과 지속적 대리 - 의사결정능력 장애인의 보호에서 인권존중으로 -", 법조, 66(2), pp.76~122 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 제철웅, "발달장애인 신탁의 필요성과 활용방안", 법학논총, 32(4), pp.425~454 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 제철웅, "유엔 장애인권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국 성년후견제도의 현재와 미래", 가족법연구, 28(2), pp.205~244 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 제철웅, "캐나다 브리티시 콜롬비아주의 의사결정능력장애인의 사법상의 권리 실현 보장체계에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 21(4), pp.1561~1602 (2014), 한국비교사법학회
- 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
- 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
- 제철웅, "중증발달장애인의 보호를 위한 특별수요신탁제도의 도입 필요성", 비교사법, 21(3), pp.1139~1184 (2014), 한국비교사법학회
- 최수정, "개정신탁법상의 재산승계제도 -유언대용신탁과 수익자연속신탁을 중심으로-", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.65~87 (2011), 법학연구소
- 최수정, "상속수단으로서의 신탁", 민사법학, (34), pp.565~602 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 최수정, "고령사회에서 성년후견제도와 신탁 - 신탁의 기능과 활용을 중심으로 -", 법조, 64(3), pp.39~69 (2015), 법조협회[DOI]
- Ashton, "Court of Protection Practice 2010" (2010), Jordans
- Bartlett, P., "The Mental Capacity Act 2005" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Coke, Mathew, "A Survey on Adult Protective Services and Elder Abuse in Hawai and Nationwide" (2007)
- Coleman, Lee, "Parens Patriae Treatment: Legal Punishment in Disguise", Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 3 (1976)
- Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, "Draft General Comment on Article 12, CRPD", C, 4[DOI]
- Edwards, R., "Trusts and Equity", LexisNexis
- Huber, Joachim, "Lehrbuch des Familienrechts" (1971), Verlag C.H.Beck
- Hurme, Sally Balch, "Steps to Enhance Guardianship Monitoring" (1991), American Bar Association
- Lush, Denzil, "Comparative Perspective on Adult Guardianship" (2015)
- Moffat, Graham, "Trusts Law", Cambridge University Press
- "Standards of Practice"[URL]
- Neugebauer, Richard, "The Treatment of the Mentally Ill in Medieval and Early Modern England: A Reappraisal", J. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14 (1978)
- Perlin, Michael, "Mental Disability Law Vol 1" (2008), LexisNexis
- Peter M. Horstman, "Protective Services for the Elderly: the Limits of Parens Patriae", Missouri Law Review, 40 (1975)
- "Staudinger Kommentar zum BGB" (2013), seiller De Gruyter
- Guardianships: Cases of Financial Exploitation, Neglect, and Abuse of Seniors, "The United States Government Accountability Office", ~ (2010)
- "UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities", General Comment No. 1(2014), CRPD, GC, pp.1, 2014[DOI]