결혼이주여성의 보호를 위한 현행 법제의 비판적 검토
Examination on Current Legislation System for Protection of Immigrant Women in International Marriage
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korea has been suffering from the imbalance of gender ratio for the marriageable population since 1990 with men’s population exceeding the number of women in their marriageable age. Additionally as most of women whose education level has lifted equally up to that of men’s tend to avoid living in the farming and fishing village out of the city, men in the fishing and farming occupation in the country side can hardly find a Korean woman willing to marry them. On the other hand however, there are a growing number of women from outside of the country such as China, Vietnam and Philippines coming to the country in attempt to realizing their Korean Dream by marring Korean men. This galloping international marriage has brought numerous unexpected social issues in Korea. This research aims to examine the legal methods for protecting these migrant women as Korean citizens in their matrimony procedure and marital life in the country. To begin with, the legal principles of listing contract and international marriage brokerage is considered for protection of the marriage immigrants to Korea. This especially emphasizes on promoting human rights of marriage migrants and their private life along with the responsibility of the international marriage brokers. Moreover, this paper studies various stages where legal protection for the immigrant women is required throughout the completion of international marriages process to the entry to the country until the settlement of their wedded life. For example, a solution must be planned ahead for the case where the marital VISA is rejected for the migrating wife. Also a legal action necessary for the immigrant wife to be able to stay in the country without any conditions even in her simplified naturalized status in case of the Korean husband’s death for protection of their family life and the children. Finally, it reviews the sojourn status, claim for division of property and visitation right of the immigrant women when the planned international marriage falls through before she obtains the citizenship. The failure of international marriage is nothing much different from that of marriage between Koreans but it could be over before the actual marriage life is even started. In case of the international marriage breakdown, it is thought that the immigrant women should be entitled to stay in the country for the visitation right even for those who don’t raise minor kids. Along with mentioned measures, exceptions to the simplified naturalization should be considered on individual cases as well. This research is originally desired to cover from the protection of international marriage to the multicultural family but on account of space consideration, protection of children from the multicultural family will be studied in the next opportunity.
Abstract
Korea has been suffering from the imbalance of gender ratio for the marriageable population since 1990 with men’s population exceeding the number of women in their marriageable age. Additionally as most of women whose education level has lifted equally up to that of men’s tend to avoid living in the farming and fishing village out of the city, men in the fishing and farming occupation in the country side can hardly find a Korean woman willing to marry them. On the other hand however, there are a growing number of women from outside of the country such as China, Vietnam and Philippines coming to the country in attempt to realizing their Korean Dream by marring Korean men. This galloping international marriage has brought numerous unexpected social issues in Korea. This research aims to examine the legal methods for protecting these migrant women as Korean citizens in their matrimony procedure and marital life in the country. To begin with, the legal principles of listing contract and international marriage brokerage is considered for protection of the marriage immigrants to Korea. This especially emphasizes on promoting human rights of marriage migrants and their private life along with the responsibility of the international marriage brokers. Moreover, this paper studies various stages where legal protection for the immigrant women is required throughout the completion of international marriages process to the entry to the country until the settlement of their wedded life. For example, a solution must be planned ahead for the case where the marital VISA is rejected for the migrating wife. Also a legal action necessary for the immigrant wife to be able to stay in the country without any conditions even in her simplified naturalized status in case of the Korean husband’s death for protection of their family life and the children. Finally, it reviews the sojourn status, claim for division of property and visitation right of the immigrant women when the planned international marriage falls through before she obtains the citizenship. The failure of international marriage is nothing much different from that of marriage between Koreans but it could be over before the actual marriage life is even started. In case of the international marriage breakdown, it is thought that the immigrant women should be entitled to stay in the country for the visitation right even for those who don’t raise minor kids. Along with mentioned measures, exceptions to the simplified naturalization should be considered on individual cases as well. This research is originally desired to cover from the protection of international marriage to the multicultural family but on account of space consideration, protection of children from the multicultural family will be studied in the next opportunity.
참고문헌 (38)
- 국제결혼중개업 건전화 방안, "김두년", 여성가족부, ~, pp.연구보고 2010-49 (2010)
- 김연, "국제사법" (2006), 법문사
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 대한변호사협회, "이주외국인을 위한 법률매뉴얼Ⅰ개정판" (2013)
- 출입국관리법과 국적법 개선에 관한 연구 ―외국인노동자, 이주여성및 이주아동 문제를 중심으로―, "박귀천", 한국법제연구원, ~, pp.현안분석 2012-14 (2012)
- 법무부, "민법(재산편) 개정 자료집" (2004)
- 석광현, "2001년 개정 국제사법 해설" (2003), 지산
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2010), 세창출판사
- 신창섭, "국제사법" (2007), 세창출판사
- 한국가정법률상담소, "다문화가정의 이혼 실태와 법적 과제 토론회 자료집", ~ (2011)
- 여성결혼이민자 취업지원을 위한 조사연구, "한국보건사회연구원", ~ (2010)
- 한복룡, "국제사법" (2007), 충남대학교출판부
- 김민아, "다문화가족의 현황 및 2011년 정책방향", 다문화 가정의 이혼 실태와 법적 과제 토론회 (2011), 한국가정법률상담소
- 김재련, "결혼중개업에 대한 검토 및 보완필요성에 대하여", 국제결혼 관련 문제점 및 개선방안세미나 (2011), 대한변호사협회․서울가정법원
- 김재련, "국제결혼을 통한 이주여성의 지위", 가족법연구, 22(1), pp.91~122 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 김종철, "이혼한 결혼 이주 여성의 체류", 국제결혼관련 문제점 및 개선방안세미나 (2011), 대한변호사협회․서울가정법원
- 문흥안, "가족법상 북한이탈주민의 남한사회 정착 지원 방안에 관한 연구 -이혼의 특례를 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.391~428 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 소라미, "결혼 이주여성의 인권 실태와 한국 법제도 현황에 대한 검토", 법학논총, 16(2), pp.43~74 (2009), 법학연구원
- 송소영, "귀화와 영주자격의 연결방안에 관한 연구―영주권전치주의 도입과 관련하여―", 입법학연구, 8 (2011), 한국입법학회
- 안종화, "다문화가정 이혼사건의 특성, 법적· 제도적 개선 및 지원방향", 다문화가정의 이혼실태와 법적 과제 토론회 (2011), 한국가정법률상담소
- 양현아, "가족 안으로 들어온 한국의 ‘다문화주의(Multiculturalism)’ 실험", 사회 통합과 법의 역할(제8회 한국법률가대회) (2012), 한국법학원
- 윤태순, "중-한 국제결혼의 증가에 따른 가족법의 문제 ―연변조선족의 한-중 “가장혼인”을 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 22(1), pp.61~90 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 이병준, "민법상 전형계약으로서의 중개계약과 중개인의 책임", 법학연구, 42(1)통권 : 50 (2001), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 이승우, "혼인이주여성의 지위와 법적 문제", 서울법학, 16(1) (2008), 서울시립대학교
- 이승우, "다문화 가족의 보호와 지원에 관한 법제 소고", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.215~238 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 이현곤, "법정에서 바라본 다문화가정", 국제결혼관련 문제점 및 개선방안세미나 (2011), 대한변호사협회․서울가정법원
- 전경운, "혼인중개계약의 법적 성질과 소비자보호방안", 민사법학, (32), pp.3~46 (2006), 한국민사법학회
- 전경운, "스위스 채무법상 혼인중개나 파트너관계중개 위임", 비교사법, 12(3), pp.593~607 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
- 전연숙, "국제가사소송사건의 실태분석 및 개선방안 ―서울가정법원 가사5단독 실무례를중심으로―", 국제사법연구, (12) (2006), 한국국제사법학회
- 정상우, "다문화가족 지원에 관한 법체계 개선 방안 연구", 법학논총, 26(1), pp.483~510 (2009), 법학연구소
- 천승우, "다문화가정 이혼 실태와 법적 해결방안 토론자료", 다문화가정 이혼 실태와 법적 해결방안 토론 (2011), 한국가정법률상담소
- 최봉경, "국제이주여성의 법적 문제에 관한 소고", 서울대학교 법학, 51(2), pp.131~162 (2010), 법학연구소
- 최신섭, "혼인중매계약과 보수반환청구(독일민법 제656조를 중심으로)", 법학연구, 1 (1999), 인하대하교 법학연구소
- 최현태, "국제결혼중개계약 관련 법률의 문제점과 해결방안", 법과정책연구, 11(1)통권 : 21, pp.91~114 (2011), 한국법정책학회
- 한숙희, "국제혼인의 파탄사유에 관한 실증적 고찰", 가족법연구, 24(1), pp.111~148 (2010), 한국가족법학회
- 1, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, Besonderer Teil Ⅱ", pp.1986, Karl Larenz
- Theo Guhl, "Das Schweizerische Obligationenrecht" (2000)
- Schaub, "Arbertsrechts-Handbuch" (2011)
