노인부양을 위한 사적 부양제도의 개선방안
A Study on the Improvement of Private Support Systems for Elderly People
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the aging population surges due to low fertility and aging, most countries expect to enter the Super-aged society in 10 to 20 years. There will be a high possibility that a small number of working age population will have a burden to support a large number of elderly people in the Super-aged Society, resulting in a slowdown of national economic growth rate and a decline of national competitiveness. Moreover, elderly people will face poverty as they don't plan for their later years. Therefore, the problem of supporting elderly people is a national task that should be urgently resolved in order to prepare for the Super-aged Society. The government has to cooperate with people to solve this problem. So, I attempt to suggest solutions by improving laws and policies that are related to private support systems for elderly people after reviewing problems. When it comes to private support systems, I pointed out some problems in provisions of civil law such as obligation of support between lineal relative by blood, gift, adult guardian and contributory portion regarding support for elderly people. First, when adult children don’t support their parents, it is difficult to force adult children to support them. Second, after parents give their property to their children, they can’t return it. Third, elderly people is not easy to access to adult guardianship system due to expense and process. Fourth, contributory portion system is not enough to support elderly people. To solve this issues, I suggest ways. First, obligation of support of adult children for their parents should be regulated distinctly in civil law. To force adult to support their parents, we should apply article 389 under civil law analogically. Second, when a donor cancels a contract of gift due to donee’s breach of faith, article 558 under civil law should be amended in order for them to get a gift back. Third, the public guardianship system should be expanded in order for poor elderly without family to use adult guardianship system easily. The guardianship of the corporation should be activated so that the elderly get a stable guardianship service. Fourth, the surving spouse of an inheritee should have a right to receive part of the inheritee’s property which were increased during their marriage life according to the period of marriage. Even if the marriage is finished due to the death of spouse, the surviving spouse should have a right of claim for division of matrimonial property.
Abstract
As the aging population surges due to low fertility and aging, most countries expect to enter the Super-aged society in 10 to 20 years. There will be a high possibility that a small number of working age population will have a burden to support a large number of elderly people in the Super-aged Society, resulting in a slowdown of national economic growth rate and a decline of national competitiveness. Moreover, elderly people will face poverty as they don't plan for their later years. Therefore, the problem of supporting elderly people is a national task that should be urgently resolved in order to prepare for the Super-aged Society. The government has to cooperate with people to solve this problem. So, I attempt to suggest solutions by improving laws and policies that are related to private support systems for elderly people after reviewing problems. When it comes to private support systems, I pointed out some problems in provisions of civil law such as obligation of support between lineal relative by blood, gift, adult guardian and contributory portion regarding support for elderly people. First, when adult children don’t support their parents, it is difficult to force adult children to support them. Second, after parents give their property to their children, they can’t return it. Third, elderly people is not easy to access to adult guardianship system due to expense and process. Fourth, contributory portion system is not enough to support elderly people. To solve this issues, I suggest ways. First, obligation of support of adult children for their parents should be regulated distinctly in civil law. To force adult to support their parents, we should apply article 389 under civil law analogically. Second, when a donor cancels a contract of gift due to donee’s breach of faith, article 558 under civil law should be amended in order for them to get a gift back. Third, the public guardianship system should be expanded in order for poor elderly without family to use adult guardianship system easily. The guardianship of the corporation should be activated so that the elderly get a stable guardianship service. Fourth, the surving spouse of an inheritee should have a right to receive part of the inheritee’s property which were increased during their marriage life according to the period of marriage. Even if the marriage is finished due to the death of spouse, the surviving spouse should have a right of claim for division of matrimonial property.
참고문헌 (66)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2017), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2013), 박영사
- 이화숙, "비교부부재산관계법" (2000), 세창출판사
- 신권철, "성년후견제도와 사회복지제도의 연계" (2013), 집문당
- 윤진수, "주해 친족법 제1권" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "주해 친족법 제2권" (2015), 박영사
- 윤진수, "民法論攷 Ⅵ" (2015), 박영사
- 한삼인, "한국가족법" (2013), 화산미디어
- 강명구, "현행법상 배우자 재산상속제도의 개선방안에 관하여", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.299~342 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 곽민희, "프랑스에 있어서 生存配偶者의 相續法上의 地位", 민사법학, 59, pp.325~367 (2012), 한국민사법학회
- 김교성, "‘활동적 노화’에 관한 다차원적 측정과 국가간 비교", 사회복지정책, 41(1), pp.1~32 (2014), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 김명진, "공공후견사업 시행의 성과 및 향후 과제", 성년후견인의 향후과제 심포지엄 자료집 (2015)
- 김미경, "프랑스의 임의후견제도: 장래보호위임계약", 가족법연구, 28(3), pp.131~170 (2014), 한국가족법학회
- 김상식, "배우자 상속분 확대에 관한 입법론적 연구", 일감법학, (28), pp.145~174 (2014), 법학연구소
- 김상용, "자녀의 유류분권과 배우자상속분에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 민사법학, (36), pp.669~708 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 김상용, "사망으로 혼인이 해소된 경우 생존 배우자의 재산권 보호", 중앙법학, 17(2), pp.223~266 (2015), 중앙법학회
- 김성동, "生存配偶者의 相續權 强化에 관한 硏究 : 亡夫에 대한 遺妻의 相續權을 中心으로", 박사, 법학과, pp.2013
- 김성수, "프랑스민법의 증여의 취소(révocation)에 관한 연구", 민사법학, 59, pp.609~664 (2012), 한국민사법학회
- 김성우, "한국 후견제도의 운영과 가정법원의 역할", 법조, 66(2), pp.123~160 (2017), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김윤정, "일본 성년후견제도의 현황과 전망", 외국사법연수논집, (32) (2013), 법원도서관
- 김은아, "재산상속상 배우자의 지위에 관한 고찰", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 김은아, "부모부양의 상속법적 접근", 법학연구, (23), pp.113~132 (2006), 한국법학회
- 김인유, "채무만을 대상으로 한 재산분할 - 대법원 2013.6.20. 선고 2010므4071,4088 전원합의체 판결 -", 법학논고, (46), pp.193~224 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 김지숙, "성년후견제도의 현황과 향후 과제", 성년후견제 시행 2년 점검 심포지엄 자료집 (2015)
- 김현수, "고령자의 신상보호를 위한 법제 개선방안", 법제, (9) (2015), 법제처
- 김현진, "프랑스의 성년후견제도 —장래보호위임계약을 중심으로—", 가족법연구, 26(1), pp.71~126 (2012), 한국가족법학회
- 김현진, "고령화 사회의 대비책: 후견계약", 가족법연구, 29(1), pp.129~176 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 김혜선, "중․장년기 가구주의 경제적 부양부담 영향요인", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 17(7), pp.555~563 (2016), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 박근수, "고령화 사회에 대응한 복지제도로서의 성년후견제도", 법학논고, (49), pp.335~352 (2015), 법학연구원
- 박도희, "배우자의 기여분", 한양법학, (25), pp.359~376 (2009), 한양법학회
- 박인환, "고령인지장애인의 인권보호와 성년후견", 저스티스, 146(1), pp.5~44 (2015), 한국법학원
- 박인환, "한국에서의 후견법인의 실천방향", 성년후견법인의 제문제 심포지엄 자료집 (2016)
- 박종용, "배우자상속권의 강화에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.8~260 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 배인구, "성년후견제도의 운영현황과 과제", 후기 고령사회에 있어 고령자·장애인을 위한 권리옹호와 의사결정지원을 위한 제1차 아시아 학술대회 의사결정지원시스템구축을 위하여, 자료집 (2015)
- 배인구, "고령화 사회와 배우자 상속분에 관한 단상", 가족법연구, 29(1), pp.177~200 (2015), 한국가족법학회
- 안경희, "민법상 부모부양과 자녀부양- 독일민법상 해석론을 참조하여 -", 법학연구, 55(1), pp.137~166 (2014), 법학연구소
- 미래가족에 대비한 가족법 및 가족관련 현행법의 정비, "우병창", 한국여성정책연구원, ~, pp.연구보고서 16-1 (2013)
- 윤태영, "임의후견제도에 관한 개정민법의 평가", 민사법의 이론과 실무, 17(1), pp.63~91 (2013), 민사법의 이론과 실무학회
- 이승우, "노친부양소고", 가족법연구, 14 (2000), 한국가족법학회
- 이영규, "임의후견제도의 활성화방안", 한양법학, 25(3), pp.77~102 (2014), 한양법학회
- 이희배, "노친부양과 관련한 효도법의 입법논의 민사법을 중심으로 한 효도법의 입법방향", 효학연구, (4) (2007), 한국효학회
- 전경근, "배우자상속분의 현황과 전망", 아주법학, 7(3), pp.201~218 (2013), 법학연구소
- 전병주, "고령화 사회에 있어 시민후견인의 활성화 방안 -일본의 문제점과 시사점을 중심으로-", 디지털융복합연구, 11(4), pp.1~10 (2013), 한국디지털정책학회
- 정구태, "2014년 법무부 민법개정위원회의 상속법 개정시안에 대한 비판적 斷想", 강원법학, 41, pp.987~1014 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 제철웅, "개정 민법상의 후견계약의 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방향 :후견대체제도의 관점을 중심으로", 민사법학, 66, pp.99~134 (2014), 한국민사법학회
- 조은희, "배우자 법정상속의 강화에 대한 재검토", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.145~174 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 최봉경, "증여계약에 관한 민법개정안 연구", 서울대학교 법학, 55(4), pp.65~101 (2014), 법학연구소
- 최성경, "배우자 상속분 입법론에 관한 소고", 법학논총, 38(2), pp.131~158 (2014), 법학연구소
- 최현숙, "고령화 사회에서 부양의무에 관한 연구 - 상속과의 연계를 중심으로 -", 재산법연구, 29(1), pp.95~119 (2012), 한국재산법학회
- 최현태, "임의후견계약의 문제점과 법정책적 제언", 법학논고, (44), pp.183~212 (2013), 법학연구원
- 홍순기, "배우자상속권 강화에 관한 법무부 개정시안 검토", 법학논총, 27(2), pp.245~274 (2014), 법학연구소
- "통계용어·지표의 이해" (2015), 통계청
- 통계청, "세계와 한국의 인구현황 및 전망", 통계청 보도자료, ~ (2015)
- 통계청, "2015년 사회조사 결과", 통계청 보도자료, ~ (2015)
- 2014 노인실태조사보고서, "한국보건사회연구원", ~ (2014)
- "한국장애인개발원, 2016년 8월 31일 보도자료", ~ (2016)
- An Aging World 2015, , U.S. Census Bureau, ~ (2016)
- Kelharrarm, "Le mandat de protection future", Direction Générale de la Cohésion Sociale, ~ (2015)
- "National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws", Uniform Power of Attorney Act with Prefatory Note And Comments, ~ (2006)
- Plaisance, Lara Queen, "Will you still When I’m Sixty-Four: Adult Children’s Legal Obligation To Aging Parents", Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 21 (2008), American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers
- Ponte, C., "L’obligation alimentaire d’un enfant à l’égard de ses parents", Soins Aides Soignantes, 8(2) (2014), Elsevier
- Ross, Allison E., "Taking Care Of Our Caretakers: Using Filial Responsibility Laws To Support The Elderly Beyond The Government’s Assistance", Elder Law Journal, 6 (2008), University of Illinois College of Law
- "The Stationery Office (on behalf of the Department for Constitutional Affairs)", Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Code of Practice), ~ (2007)
- Vallario, Angela M., "The Uniform Power of Attorney Act: Not a One-Size-Fits-All Solution", University of Baltimore Law Review, 43(1) (2014), University of Baltimore School of Law
- 川島武宣, "子の親扶養に対する各国の法律とその背景", 老年病, 1962(special) (2009), 日本老年医学會
- 硏究報告 成年後見制度の現狀の分析と課題の檢討, "成年後見制度硏究會", ~ (2010)