일본에서 교통사고로 사망한 북한인의 손해배상청구권 상속에 관한 준거법 결정 — 名古屋地方裁判所 2014.6.6. 判決에 대한 비판적 연구 —
Choice of Law on the Inheritance of the Right to Claim Damages of North Koreans who Died in a Traffic Accident in Japan — A Critical Study on the Nagoya District Court Decision Delivered on June 6th, 2014 —
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The following is a summary of the discussion in this article. First, it is not reasonable that the judgment of the Nagoya district court ruled only the governing law of inheritance, and that no ruling on the governing law of illegal act is lacking in international judicial thinking. Second, in order for the right to constitute the property of the decedent to become an inheritance, inheritance must be recognized by the governing law of the right (individual property). Third, in this case, although the objection to the Japanese law(renvoi) should be recognized by the clue of Article 45 (1) of the External Civil Relations Act of the DPRK, the ruling does not mention the contradiction at all. This is an obvious error. Fourth, North Korean law, unlike Japanese law and Korean law, takes a supported structure without taking an inherited structure about damages caused by life infringement. Therefore, the right to claim for damages caused by life infringement does not constitute inherited property. Fifth, the Gwangju District Court treated the case of North Korean people who had died in a traffic accident as a pure domestic matter, and made no judgment on the decision of the governing law. But this is a quasi-international judicial matter, so that it is reasonable to determine the governing law by analogy to private international law.
Abstract
The following is a summary of the discussion in this article. First, it is not reasonable that the judgment of the Nagoya district court ruled only the governing law of inheritance, and that no ruling on the governing law of illegal act is lacking in international judicial thinking. Second, in order for the right to constitute the property of the decedent to become an inheritance, inheritance must be recognized by the governing law of the right (individual property). Third, in this case, although the objection to the Japanese law(renvoi) should be recognized by the clue of Article 45 (1) of the External Civil Relations Act of the DPRK, the ruling does not mention the contradiction at all. This is an obvious error. Fourth, North Korean law, unlike Japanese law and Korean law, takes a supported structure without taking an inherited structure about damages caused by life infringement. Therefore, the right to claim for damages caused by life infringement does not constitute inherited property. Fifth, the Gwangju District Court treated the case of North Korean people who had died in a traffic accident as a pure domestic matter, and made no judgment on the decision of the governing law. But this is a quasi-international judicial matter, so that it is reasonable to determine the governing law by analogy to private international law.
참고문헌 (36)
- 김연, "국제사법" (2014), 법문사
- 문흥안, "북한민법주석" (2015), 법무부
- 석광현, "국제사법해설" (2013), 박영사
- 신창선, "新國際私法" (2016), fides
- 신창섭, "국제사법" (2018), 세창출판사
- 안춘수, "국제사법" (2017), 법문사
- 이호정, "국제사법" (1981), 경문사
- 이효원, "통일법의 이해" (2014), 박영사
- 고영아, "생명침해로 인한 손해배상청구권의 구성에 관한 재고찰 - 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로 -", 민사법학, 49(1), pp.89~124 (2010), 한국민사법학회
- 박원규, "개성공업지구에서의 경제활동과 관련된 민사분쟁의 사법적 해결방안에 관한 연구 –개성공업지구 현지기업이 당사자인 남남분쟁(南南紛爭)을 중심으로", 사법, 1(35), pp.157~208 (2016), 사법발전재단[DOI]
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제5권" (2012), 박영사
- 석광현, "남북한 주민 간 법률관계의 올바른 규율: 광의의 준국제사법규칙과 실질법의 특례를 중심으로", 국제사법연구, 21(2), pp.335~399 (2015), 한국국제사법학회
- 오지용, "새로운 손해배상 산정방식의 모색 - 중국의 손해배상 산정방식과 우리 법제에의 시사점 -", 법조, 57(11), pp.5~39 (2008), 법조협회[DOI]
- 윤상도, (2007), 법원행정처
- 이병화, "國際的 相續問題에 관한 抵觸法的 考察", 저스티스, (85), pp.241~267 (2005), 한국법학원
- 임성택, "남북한 주민간 불법행위 손해배상에 관한 연구", 통일과 법률, (2) (2010), 법무부
- 장문철, "북한의 국제사법", 국제사법연구, (6) (2001), 한국국제사법학회
- 정구태, "재일동포의 상속에 있어서 준거법 결정에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, 25(1), pp.55~98 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 정구태, "북한주민의 혼인․친자․상속관계소송에 관한 諸問題", 고려법학, (70), pp.279~328 (2013), 법학연구원
- 정구태, "북한주민의 상속회복청구권 행사와 제척기간 再論 - 대법원 2016. 10. 19. 선고 2014다46648 전원합의체 판결에 대한 비판적 연구 -", 통일과 법률, (29), pp.43~72 (2017), 법무부[DOI]
- 정구태, "이혼시 재산분할청구권 및 위자료청구권 보전을 위한 채권자취소권의 준거법-대법원 2016. 12. 29. 선고 2013므4133 판결-", 인문사회 21, 8(2), pp.1105~1124 (2017), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- 정인섭, "북한의 대외민사관계법 시행과 재일교포의 가족법 문제―북일수교후 일본에서의 취급 예상", 서울대학교 법학, 37(2) (1996), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 최흥섭, "한국 국제사법에서 총괄준거법과 개별준거법의 관계", 비교사법, 21(2), pp.597~624 (2014), 한국사법학회[DOI]
- 道垣內正人, "(ポイント)国際私法: 各論" (2014), 有斐閣
- 木棚照一, "国際私法槪論" (2007), 有斐閣
- 本棚照一, "｢在日｣ の家族法 Q&A" (2010), 日本評論社
- 木棚照一, "逐条解説 国際家族法―重要判例と学説の動向" (2017), 日本加除出版
- 山田鐐一, "国際私法" (2004), 有斐閣
- 林貴美, (2011), 有斐閣
- 中西康, "国際私法" (2014), 有斐閣
- 尾崎正利, "ジュリスト 別冊 No.185: 国際私法判例百選" (2007), 有斐閣
- 石黑一憲, "現代家族法大系(4)" (1980), 有斐閣
- 奧田安弘, "外國人の勞災事故における損害賠償額の算定", ジュリスト, (1131) (1998), 有斐閣
- 中野俊一郞, "觀光目的で來日し, 交通事故で死亡した中國人の逸失利益の算定", ジュリスト, (1009) (1992), 有斐閣
- 中野俊一郞, "不法殘留外國人の勞災事故による逸失利益の算定方法", 民商法雜誌, 117(3) (1997), 有斐閣
- 織田有基子, "交通事故により死亡した北朝鮮人の損害賠償請求権の相続", 戶籍時報, (744) (2016), 日本加除出版