본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

오스트리아 상속법의 소개 ― 법정상속을 중심으로 ―

Statutory Inheritance in Austrian Inheritance Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Traditionally, inheritance law has not been considered suitable for comparative legal research. However, with the global trend of increased cross-border movement and interaction, the need for unified regulations regarding inheritance matters has emerged. Before moving forward with such international legislative efforts, it is essential to conduct foundational research to accurately and comprehensively understand our inheritance law by comparing and examining the inheritance law systems of modern civil codes referenced in the drafting process of Korea Civil Code. Austrian inheritance law, having developed from ius commune influenced by Roman and canon law, shares general commonalities with European inheritance law systems. Meanwhile, the unique regulations and institutions specific to Austria mostly retain legal principles originated from Roman law. In this respect, the study of Austrian inheritance law serves as a foundational comparative study that examines the basic institutions and original forms shared by European civil codes. In addition to the necessity of such historical comparative legal research, Austrian inheritance law requires detailed legislative review, as it is considered one of the most modern inheritance laws. The inheritance- related provisions in Austria’s General Civil Code (ABGB) have undergone a comprehensive reform to reflect social changes over the 200 years since its enactment in 1811. The 2015 inheritance law reform modernized the language and incorporated accumulated case law, updating the law to reflect societal and legal developments since its inception. Above all, this reform involved redesigning regulations and institutions to account for changes in family structures in modern society, incorporating these into wills, statutory inheritance, and especially compulsory portions (Pflichtteil). In this way, Austrian inheritance law shows both traditional aspects of civil law inheritance principles rooted in Roman inheritance law and modern aspects reflecting family structure changes due to social evolution, underscoring the importance of comparative legal research. This paper aims to introduce the contents of Austrian inheritance law, focusing on statutory inheritance. To this end, the history and primary legal sources of Austrian inheritance law were first examined. Then, the paper provided a detailed introduction to the system of inheritance assets and inheritance asset procedures in Austrian inheritance law, while comparing and analyzing similarities and differences in regulations within other civil law inheritance systems, including those in Korea. The section on statutory inheritance examines the order and scope of statutory heirs, division of inheritance shares and inheritance assets, inheritance recovery claims, and matters regarding separation of assets, in that order. The contents regarding Austrian inheritance law’s provisions on bequests and compulsory portions (Pflichtteil) will be covered in subsequent studies, where they will be introduced in sequence.

Abstract

Traditionally, inheritance law has not been considered suitable for comparative legal research. However, with the global trend of increased cross-border movement and interaction, the need for unified regulations regarding inheritance matters has emerged. Before moving forward with such international legislative efforts, it is essential to conduct foundational research to accurately and comprehensively understand our inheritance law by comparing and examining the inheritance law systems of modern civil codes referenced in the drafting process of Korea Civil Code. Austrian inheritance law, having developed from ius commune influenced by Roman and canon law, shares general commonalities with European inheritance law systems. Meanwhile, the unique regulations and institutions specific to Austria mostly retain legal principles originated from Roman law. In this respect, the study of Austrian inheritance law serves as a foundational comparative study that examines the basic institutions and original forms shared by European civil codes. In addition to the necessity of such historical comparative legal research, Austrian inheritance law requires detailed legislative review, as it is considered one of the most modern inheritance laws. The inheritance- related provisions in Austria’s General Civil Code (ABGB) have undergone a comprehensive reform to reflect social changes over the 200 years since its enactment in 1811. The 2015 inheritance law reform modernized the language and incorporated accumulated case law, updating the law to reflect societal and legal developments since its inception. Above all, this reform involved redesigning regulations and institutions to account for changes in family structures in modern society, incorporating these into wills, statutory inheritance, and especially compulsory portions (Pflichtteil). In this way, Austrian inheritance law shows both traditional aspects of civil law inheritance principles rooted in Roman inheritance law and modern aspects reflecting family structure changes due to social evolution, underscoring the importance of comparative legal research. This paper aims to introduce the contents of Austrian inheritance law, focusing on statutory inheritance. To this end, the history and primary legal sources of Austrian inheritance law were first examined. Then, the paper provided a detailed introduction to the system of inheritance assets and inheritance asset procedures in Austrian inheritance law, while comparing and analyzing similarities and differences in regulations within other civil law inheritance systems, including those in Korea. The section on statutory inheritance examines the order and scope of statutory heirs, division of inheritance shares and inheritance assets, inheritance recovery claims, and matters regarding separation of assets, in that order. The contents regarding Austrian inheritance law’s provisions on bequests and compulsory portions (Pflichtteil) will be covered in subsequent studies, where they will be introduced in sequence.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김가을, "독일 민법 제2100조 이하 선-그리고 후상속인(Vor-und Nacherbe)제도에 관한 입법사 연구", 비교사법, 29(1), pp.71~100 (2022)
  2. 김기환, "프랑스법상 상속인 부재 시 상속재산의 처리", 강원법학, 73, pp.279~305 (2023)
  3. 김문숙, "상속준거법에서의 당사자자치 : EU상속규정을 중심으로", 국제사법연구, 23(1), pp.283~341 (2017), 한국국제사법학회
  4. 김미경, "대습상속 원인으로서 상속 포기 도입 필요성 ― 상속포기를 대습사유로 도입한 프랑스 민법 검토―", 법학연구 통권, 72, pp.221~241 (2023)
  5. 김진우, "생전증여, 기여분과 유류분: 독일법으로부터의 시사점: 수원고등법원 2020. 06. 18. 선고 2019나18217 판결을 중심으로", 법학논총, 28(2), pp.213~278 (2021)
  6. 김현진, "프랑스의 유류분 제도와 우리 민법 개정에의 시사점", 가족법연구, 37(2), pp.121~176 (2023)
  7. 김형석, "우리 상속법의 비교법적 위치", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.75~126 (2009)
  8. 남궁술, "프랑스 민법상 상속재산의 분할청구권과 그 행사의 제한에 대한 일고", 법학연구, 27(1), pp.1~27 (2019)
  9. 백경일, "상속계약에 관한 고찰 ― 독일법과 프랑스법 등을 비교하여", 저스티스, 192, pp.96~132 (2022)
  10. 양승욱, "독일 상속법상의 유형강제와 우리 민법의 유언법정주의", 안암법학, 66, pp.489~522 (2023)
  11. 이동수, "독일의 유언집행제도", 가족법연구, 35(1), pp.103~148 (2021)
  12. 이성범, "상속법상 포괄승계원칙과 디지털 유산: 소셜 네트워크 서비스 계정의 상속성에 관한 독일 연방대법원 판결(BGH, Urteil v. 12. 07. 2018 - Ⅲ ZR 183", 17)을 중심으로, 2020, pp.34(3), 259~296
  13. 이재우, "프랑스 민법상의 생전증여", 법학연구, 27(1), pp.73~97 (2019)
  14. 윤진수, "주해상속법" (2019), 박영사
  15. 최병조, "로마법강의" (1999), 박영사
  16. 최병조, "포괄적 유증의 효과", 민사판례연구, 9 (1987)
  17. 최준규, "한정승인, 재산분리, 상속재산의 파산에 관한 입법론 ― 비교법의 관점에서―", 법학, 60(2), pp.121~209 (2019), 서울대학교
  18. Beckert, Jens, "Unverdientes Vermögen: Soziologie des Erbrechts" (2024), MPIfG Buch
  19. Eccher, Bernhard, "Erbrecht" (2020)
  20. Kaser, "Römisches Privatrecht" (2022)
  21. Kletečka, "ABGB-ON 1.01", ~ (2012)
  22. Koziol, "Kurzkommentar zum ABGB(KBB)" (2017)
  23. Koziol, "Kurzkommentar zum ABGB(KBB)" (2014)
  24. Kralik, Winfried, "System des österreichischen allgemeinen Privatrechts, $. Buch. Das Erbrecht" (1983)
  25. Schwimann, "ABGB Praxiskommentar - Band 4" (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)