본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「친생자관계부존재확인의 소」에 관한 개정 논의―허위의 친생자 출생신고에 따른 사회적 친자관계의 보호를 중심으로―

How to Revise the Action for Confirmation of Non-existence of Parentage ―Focusing on the Protection of Social Parenthood according to Fraudulent Birth Registration―

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article reviews and analyzes precedent court cases that recognize the validity of adoption in fraudulent birth registration prior to the revision of the Civil Code in 2012. It also discusses the need for and measures to protect the ‘social parenthood,’ after the Civil Code revision in 2012 focusing on revising the action for confirming the non-existence of parentage. Analyzing the precedent court cases up until recently, the court has recognized the validity of adoptions under certain conditions by interpreting fraudulent birth registration, in order to protect the relationship between parties who have socially and emotionally established a parent-child relationship for decades. However, under the current adoption system, which is a legal requirement for permission from the family court, when a fraudulent birth registration is filed without permission from the family court, the valid of adoption cannot be recognized. Therefore, there are limits to protecting social parenthood through legal interpretation in cases where fraudulent birth registration have been made, and legal amendment should be sought to protect such relationships. In order to protect social parenthood, the minimum requirements such as ‘intention to establish parent-child relationship, the burden of parenting responsibility, and duration of maintaining the parent-child relationship’ should be considered. Additionally, when deciding who is the legal parent, ‘the best interests of the child’ must take precedence.

Abstract

This article reviews and analyzes precedent court cases that recognize the validity of adoption in fraudulent birth registration prior to the revision of the Civil Code in 2012. It also discusses the need for and measures to protect the ‘social parenthood,’ after the Civil Code revision in 2012 focusing on revising the action for confirming the non-existence of parentage. Analyzing the precedent court cases up until recently, the court has recognized the validity of adoptions under certain conditions by interpreting fraudulent birth registration, in order to protect the relationship between parties who have socially and emotionally established a parent-child relationship for decades. However, under the current adoption system, which is a legal requirement for permission from the family court, when a fraudulent birth registration is filed without permission from the family court, the valid of adoption cannot be recognized. Therefore, there are limits to protecting social parenthood through legal interpretation in cases where fraudulent birth registration have been made, and legal amendment should be sought to protect such relationships. In order to protect social parenthood, the minimum requirements such as ‘intention to establish parent-child relationship, the burden of parenting responsibility, and duration of maintaining the parent-child relationship’ should be considered. Additionally, when deciding who is the legal parent, ‘the best interests of the child’ must take precedence.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 권재문, "친생자관계의 결정기준", 박사, 민법, pp.2010
  2. 권재문, "법적인 ‘아버지’를 결정하기 위한 요건들에 관한 일고찰―미국에서의 논의를 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 21(3), pp.57~84 (2007), 한국가족법학회
  3. 김상용, "가족법과 혈연진실주의", 법철학연구, 22(1), pp.159~200 (2019), 한국법철학회[DOI]
  4. 김용빈, "양부모가 이혼하여 양모가 양부의 가를 떠났을 경우, 양모자관계가 소멸하는지여부", 대법원판례해설, (36) (2001), 법원도서관
  5. (2010), 법원행정처
  6. 배인구, "2018년 가족법 주요 판례 10선" (2019), 세창출판사
  7. 서인겸, "친생자 출생신고에 관한 무효행위전환 법리의 적용상 문제점", 원광법학, 34(4), pp.277~295 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  8. 안문희, "프랑스민법상 친자관계에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 27(2), pp.121~142 (2020), 한국사법학회[DOI]
  9. 오종근, "독일민법전 가족법" (2020), 법무부
  10. 오병철, "동성결합과 이중입양", 인권과 정의, (479), pp.45~66 (2019), 대한변호사협회[DOI]
  11. 윤진수, "주해 친족법(제1권)" (2015), 박영사
  12. 윤진수, "허위의 친생자 출생신고에 의한 입양에 관한 몇 가지 문제", 민법논고, Ⅳ (2009), 박영사
  13. 이은정, "가족제도의 변화와 친자법 개정의 필요성", 법학논고, 33 (2010), 경북대학교 법학연구원
  14. 이은, "부부공동입양", Juris forum, (2) (2002), 충북대학교 법학연구소
  15. 임혜원, "입양의 실질적 요건을 갖춘, 친생자 출생신고로 인한 입양의 효력", 대법원판례해설, (115) (2018), 법원도서관
  16. 정다영, "프랑스 민법상 친자관계에 관한 소송", 가족법연구, 34(2), pp.307~354 (2020), 한국가족법학회
  17. 지원림, "부부공동입양에 관한 斷想", 성균관법학, 21(3), pp.307~325 (2009), 법학연구원[DOI]
  18. 최진섭, "친족법의 미래와 과제", 가족법 연구, (14) (2000), 한국가족법학회
  19. 최진섭, "사회적 친자관계와 법률상의 친자관계", 인천법학논총, (1) (1998), 인천대학교
  20. Rainer Frank, "자녀의 생부에 의한 친생부인에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 가족법연구, 20(1) (2006), 한국가족법학회
  21. 二宮 周平, "家族法", 新世社, ~ (2019)
  22. 西 希代子, "親子關係不存在確認請求と權利濫用", ジュリスト 別冊 民法判例百選 III, (225) (2015), 有斐閣

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)