생부의 친생부인권과 임시출생신고에 관한 입법론
Legislation Proposal on the Denial of Paternity and Provisional Birth Registration by Biological Father of Child
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, the author proposes legislation that would recognize the biological father’s right to deny paternity for a child born within wedlock, and allow the biological father to seek a provisional birth registration for such a child. The main points of the proposed legislation can be summarized as follows: On the biological father’s rights to deny paternity: 1. Ⓐ Within 2 years from the date of the child’s birth, or Ⓑ within 1 year from the date the plaintiff discovers that he is the biological father, provided there is no social parenthood between the legal father and the child, and if the adult child consents to the denial themselves, the biological father may file for the denial of paternity against the legal father and the child/the mother with parental authority. 2. Although the above requirements are met, the court may dismiss the biological father’s request for denial of paternity if such denial significantly harms or is likely to harm the welfare of the child. 3. Any person who files for denial of paternity while aware that he is not the biological father will be subject to criminal punishment. On the provisional birth registration by biological father of the child: 1. The biological father who has already filed for denial of paternity may apply for a provisional birth registration listing himself as the father of the registered child, by attaching test results conducted through scientific methods proving that he is the biological father. 2. A provisional birth registration has the same effect as a formal one, except for matters regarding the child's legal father. Even if a provisional birth registration is made listing himself as the father of the registered child, the child’s legal father remains the mother’s husband until the court’s judgment denying the presumed paternity of the husband, and confirming the biological father's acknowledgment of his paternity is finalized. 3. Upon finalization of the judgment in the lawsuit filed by the biological father for denying paternity, or termination of the legal proceedings for other reasons, the legal father and mother responsible for the birth registration, and the biological father who applied for the provisional birth registration are obligated to correct the provisional birth registration in accordance with the final judgment or parental law.
Abstract
In this article, the author proposes legislation that would recognize the biological father’s right to deny paternity for a child born within wedlock, and allow the biological father to seek a provisional birth registration for such a child. The main points of the proposed legislation can be summarized as follows: On the biological father’s rights to deny paternity: 1. Ⓐ Within 2 years from the date of the child’s birth, or Ⓑ within 1 year from the date the plaintiff discovers that he is the biological father, provided there is no social parenthood between the legal father and the child, and if the adult child consents to the denial themselves, the biological father may file for the denial of paternity against the legal father and the child/the mother with parental authority. 2. Although the above requirements are met, the court may dismiss the biological father’s request for denial of paternity if such denial significantly harms or is likely to harm the welfare of the child. 3. Any person who files for denial of paternity while aware that he is not the biological father will be subject to criminal punishment. On the provisional birth registration by biological father of the child: 1. The biological father who has already filed for denial of paternity may apply for a provisional birth registration listing himself as the father of the registered child, by attaching test results conducted through scientific methods proving that he is the biological father. 2. A provisional birth registration has the same effect as a formal one, except for matters regarding the child's legal father. Even if a provisional birth registration is made listing himself as the father of the registered child, the child’s legal father remains the mother’s husband until the court’s judgment denying the presumed paternity of the husband, and confirming the biological father's acknowledgment of his paternity is finalized. 3. Upon finalization of the judgment in the lawsuit filed by the biological father for denying paternity, or termination of the legal proceedings for other reasons, the legal father and mother responsible for the birth registration, and the biological father who applied for the provisional birth registration are obligated to correct the provisional birth registration in accordance with the final judgment or parental law.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김상용, "가족법과 혈연진실주의", 법철학연구, 22(1) (2019)
- 김상용, "생부(미혼부)의 권리에 관한 소고―생부의 출생신고와 친생부인권을 중심으로", 중앙법학, 22(1) (2020)
- 안문희, "프랑스민법상 친자관계에 관한 연구", 비교사법, 27(2) (2020)
- 미혼부 출생신고제도 개선 검토, "안문희", 한국법학원, ~, pp.한국법학원 연구보고서 민-23-02 (2023)
- 안영하, "민법상 부모와 자녀의 친자관계에 대한 현행규정의 구조와 한계", 한국민법과 프랑스민법 연구 (2021)
- 양진섭, "혼인 외의 자녀와 출생신고―대법원 2020. 6. 8.자 2020스575결정과 최근 가족관계등록법 개정을 중심으로", 사법, (57) (2020)
- 이동진, "부자관계의 설정과 해소: 입법론적 고찰", 인권과 정의, (509) (2022)
- 이은정, "친생자관계부존재확인의 소에 관한 개정 논의", 가족법연구, 37(1) (2023)
- 정구태, "2019년 친족상속법 관련 주요 판례 회고", 안암법학, (60) (2019)
- 정다영, "프랑스민법상 친자관계에 관한 소송", 가족법연구, 34(2) (2020)
- 조인영, "친생추정의 범위에 관한 무제한설의 재조명", 가족법연구, 36(1) (2022)
- 홍윤선, "사회적 친자관계와 자녀의 복리―독일에서의 논의를 중심으로", 가족법연구, 35(2) (2021)
- Rainer Frank, "자녀의 생부에 의한 친생부인에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 가족법연구, 20(1) (2006)
- Rainer Frank, "자율과 정의의 민법학" (2021)
- "民法(親子法制)等の改正に関する中間試案, 別冊NBL No.174", ~ (2021)
- 山口真由, "アメリカにおける第二の親の決定", ~ (2022)
- 常岡史子, "嫡出否認権者の拡大の意義-親子法全般にもたらす影響", 民商法雑誌, 159(1) (2023)
- Ingeborg Schwenzer, "Model Family Code―From a global perspective", ~ (2006)
- Spickhoff, "Streit um die Abstammung" (2007)
- Tobias Helms, "Rechtliche, biologische und soziale Elternschaft―Herausforderungen durch neue Familienformen, Gutachten F zum 71" (2016), Deutschen Juristentag
- Jehanne Sosson, "Adults and Children in Postmodern Societies―A Comparative Law and Multidisciplinary Handbook" (2019)
- Sean Hannon Williams, "DNA DILEMMAS", Yale L. & Pol’y Rev, 40, pp.536~ (2022)
- Tone Sverdrup, "NORWAY: THE STRENGTHENING OF FATHERS’ RIGHTS IN NORWEGIAN CHILD LAW AND OTHER RECENT REFORMS", 2018 INT’l SURV. FAM. L, pp.385~ (2018)
- "Beck-Online GrossKommentar BGB 1.8.2023", ~ (2023)
- "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB 9.Auflage" (2024)
- Philippe Malaurie, "Droit de la famille" (2018)
- François Terré, "Droit civil; la famille" (2018)
