본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고유 명칭에 대한 기술 이론의 역사적 논쟁 고찰

Investigating Historical Debate on the Description Theories of Proper Names

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Frege (1892) and Russell (1905, 1919) tried to define the meaning of proper names with definite descriptions, called ‘description theories of proper names,’ while Strawson (1950), Donnellan (1966) and Kripke (1972) argued against the description theories of proper names. Before them, Mill (1843) insisted that proper names are not connotative but they denote the individuals who are called by them, which is against the description theories. The major issues of this debate are what the meaning of proper names is, whether the meaning of proper names can be defined as definite descriptions or not, and what it is, if possible. In this respect, this paper aims to investigating historical debate on the description theories of proper names. To do this, Mill (1843) is investigated in Section 2. Frege (1892) and Russell (1905, 1919, 1956) as representatives of the description theories of proper names are investigated in Section 3. Strawson (1950), Donnellan (1966) and Kripke (1972) against the description theories of proper names are investigated in Section 4.

Abstract

Frege (1892) and Russell (1905, 1919) tried to define the meaning of proper names with definite descriptions, called ‘description theories of proper names,’ while Strawson (1950), Donnellan (1966) and Kripke (1972) argued against the description theories of proper names. Before them, Mill (1843) insisted that proper names are not connotative but they denote the individuals who are called by them, which is against the description theories. The major issues of this debate are what the meaning of proper names is, whether the meaning of proper names can be defined as definite descriptions or not, and what it is, if possible. In this respect, this paper aims to investigating historical debate on the description theories of proper names. To do this, Mill (1843) is investigated in Section 2. Frege (1892) and Russell (1905, 1919, 1956) as representatives of the description theories of proper names are investigated in Section 3. Strawson (1950), Donnellan (1966) and Kripke (1972) against the description theories of proper names are investigated in Section 4.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. Donnellan, K, "Reference and definite descriptions. In the Philosophy of Language", pp.246~248 (1985), Oxford University Press
  2. Frege, G, "On sense and meaning. In the Philosophy of Language", pp.200~212 (1985), Oxford University Press
  3. Kripke, S, "Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. In the Philosophy of Language", pp.249~267 (1985), Oxford University Press
  4. Mill,J.S, "A System of Logic" (1843), London
  5. Russell,B, "On denoting", Mind, 14, pp.479~493 (1905)
  6. Russell, B, "Descriptions. In the Philosophy of Language", pp.213~219 (1985), Oxford University Press
  7. Russell,B, "An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth" (1956), George Allen and Unwin LTD
  8. Strawson, P. F, "On referring. In the Philosophy of Language", pp.220~235 (1985), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)