크립키의 의미회의주의에 관하여
On Kripke’s Meaning Scepticism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine Kripke’s meaning scepticism, or sceptical paradox and sceptical solution about meaning in the late 20th century, and show an argument against his negative thesis about meaning. Frist, historical background of meaning scepticism will be introduced. Next, each of his negative views about meaning will be reorganized as an argument. Finally, my argument will be provided against the negative prospective of meaning. 1) There is another practical area of language that cannot be regarded as an area depending only on agreement of community. 2) It is true that the sceptic about meaning relies on his memory, which is criticized by himself. 3) Basic principles of logic can be a good candidate of low-level fact for meaning ascription. 4) How much degree of justification do we need to determine whether a candidate is a fact about meaning ascription? 5) Should we admit that the argument of the sceptic is sound? I have suggested my opinions for each of them, 1) ~ 5). And I believe that my argument implies a conclusion that we have a good starting point to go opposite way of the unpromising line about meaning.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine Kripke’s meaning scepticism, or sceptical paradox and sceptical solution about meaning in the late 20th century, and show an argument against his negative thesis about meaning. Frist, historical background of meaning scepticism will be introduced. Next, each of his negative views about meaning will be reorganized as an argument. Finally, my argument will be provided against the negative prospective of meaning. 1) There is another practical area of language that cannot be regarded as an area depending only on agreement of community. 2) It is true that the sceptic about meaning relies on his memory, which is criticized by himself. 3) Basic principles of logic can be a good candidate of low-level fact for meaning ascription. 4) How much degree of justification do we need to determine whether a candidate is a fact about meaning ascription? 5) Should we admit that the argument of the sceptic is sound? I have suggested my opinions for each of them, 1) ~ 5). And I believe that my argument implies a conclusion that we have a good starting point to go opposite way of the unpromising line about meaning.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김영건, "의미의 규범성 - 크립키와 맥도웰 -", 철학논집, 51, pp.213~239 (2017), 철학연구소[DOI]
- Kripke, S., "비트겐슈타인: 규칙과 사적 언어" (2008)
- 박만엽, "‘규칙따르기 역설’에 대한 크립키 논증의 비판적 분석", 논리연구, 9(1), pp.97~136 (2006), 한국논리학회
- 오은영, "Kripke vs. Wittgenstein on the Notion of Rule-following and Semantic Contextualism", 논리연구, 19(1), pp.49~82 (2016), 한국논리학회[DOI]
- 이상룡, "데이빗슨의 삼각 작용과 공동체", 대동철학, (64), pp.205~229 (2013), 대동철학회
- Schwartz S. P., "분석철학의 역사" (2017), 서광사
- 한상기, "콰인의 분석 - 종합 구별 공격 다시 생각하기", 철학연구, 140, pp.385~406 (2016), 대한철학회[DOI]
- Boghossian, P., "The Status of Content", Philosophical Review, 99 (1990)
- Boghossian, P., "Rule-Following and Meaning" (2002), Acumen
- Dummitt, M., "Wittgenstein’ Philosophy of Mathematics", The Philosophical Review, 68 (1959)
- Fodor, J., "The Language of Thought" (1976), Harvester Press
- Frances, B., "“Kripke” in Philosophy of Language: The Key Thinkers" (2011), Continumm
- Grice H. P., "In Defense of a Dogma", The Philosophical Review, 65(2), pp.141~158 (1956)
- McDowell, J., "his Meaning, Knowledge and Reality" (1998), Harverd Univ
- Miller, A., "Philosophy of Language" (2007), Routledge
- Miller, A., "The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language" (2006), Blackwell
- Putnam, H., "Renewing Philosophy" (1992), Havard Univ
- Quine, W.V., "his From a Logical Point of View" (1953), Harvard Univ
- Quine, W.V., "On the Reasons for the Indeterminacy of Translation", Journal of Philosophy, 67 (1970)
- Soames, S., "Philosophy of Language" (2010), Princeton Univ
- Wittgenstein L., "Philosophical Investigations" (1974), Basil Blackwell
- Wright, C., "his Rails to Infinity" (2001), Harvard Univ
- Wright, C., "his Rails to Infinity" (2001), Harvard Univ
- Zalabardo, J., "Rules, Communities, Judgements", Critica, 63 (1978)