동사이동의 변화와 부정문의 DO-Support
The Diachronic Change of Verb Movement and DO-Support in Negation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The diachronic changes of Verb Movement, negation, and the periphrastic DO in English were analyzed in this study. In OE and ME, the main verb moved to INFL or C, but English lost its V-Raising ability in ENE. At the end of the 15th century, the plural marking disappeared in English verb morphology. Consequently, verbs cannot move to INFL in NE. The OE negative particle ne must immediately precede the finite verb. In OE, the emphatic negator noht could occur after the verb to strengthen the preceding ne. In ME, not came to be the regular nonemphatic negator, hence preverbal ne was unnecessary and disappeared. The structure “do x”, which was first introduced by the influence of French faire x in the South-Western dialect in the late 13th century, was argued to be the origin of the periphrastic DO. The grammaticalization of the periphrastic DO was closely related to the loss of V-Raising in ENE. After the loss of V-Raising, the optional DO was grammaticalized as the NE periphrastic DO for negative sentences. When there is no auxiliary verb, DO is inserted under Tense to support the negator not in NE. This is called “DO-Support.”
Abstract
The diachronic changes of Verb Movement, negation, and the periphrastic DO in English were analyzed in this study. In OE and ME, the main verb moved to INFL or C, but English lost its V-Raising ability in ENE. At the end of the 15th century, the plural marking disappeared in English verb morphology. Consequently, verbs cannot move to INFL in NE. The OE negative particle ne must immediately precede the finite verb. In OE, the emphatic negator noht could occur after the verb to strengthen the preceding ne. In ME, not came to be the regular nonemphatic negator, hence preverbal ne was unnecessary and disappeared. The structure “do x”, which was first introduced by the influence of French faire x in the South-Western dialect in the late 13th century, was argued to be the origin of the periphrastic DO. The grammaticalization of the periphrastic DO was closely related to the loss of V-Raising in ENE. After the loss of V-Raising, the optional DO was grammaticalized as the NE periphrastic DO for negative sentences. When there is no auxiliary verb, DO is inserted under Tense to support the negator not in NE. This is called “DO-Support.”
참고문헌 (27)
- 김석산, "英語史" (1990), 민음사
- Barber,C, "Early Modern English" (1976), André Deutsch
- Chomsky,N, "Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation", MIT Working Paters in Linguistics, 10 (1989)
- Chomsky,N, "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1 (1992)
- Denison,D, "The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered", pp.45~60 (1985)
- Denison,D, "English Historical Syntax" (1993), Longman
- Eaton R, "Papers from the 4th international conference on English historical linguistics" (1985), John Benjamins
- Ellegård,A, "The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English" (1953), Almqvist & Wiksell
- Ernst,T, "The Phrase Structure of English Negation", 석사, pp.1990
- Fischer,O, "Syntax", CHEL II, 1066-1476, 207~408 (1992)
- Gray, D, "The Oxford Book of Late Medieval Verse and Prose" (1985), OUP
- Jespersen, O, "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1909), Allen & Unwin
- Kenyon,J.S, "The Syntax of the Infinitive in Chaucer" (1909), Brill and Leiden University Press
- Marchand,H.1939.Review of Engblom, "Review of Engblom", English Studies 21, pp.21~ (1939)
- Moore,S, "Historical Outlines of English Sounds and Inflections" (1951), Wahr
- Pollock,J.-Y, "Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Preusler,W, "Keltischer Einfluss im Englischen", Indogermanische Forschungen, 56, pp.178~191 (1938)
- Rissanen,M, "Spoken language and the history of do-periphrasis, In Historical English Syntax", pp.321~342 (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
- Rissanen,M, "Syntax", CHEL III, 1476-1776, 187~331 (1999)
- Roberts,I, "Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French" (1990), Université de Genève
- 신성균, "The Origin of Do-Support and Parameter-Resetting", 영어영문학연구, 52(2), pp.185~201 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Stern.G, "Meaning and Change of Meaning" (1936), Elanders boktryckeri
- Sweet,H, "A New English Grammar: Logical and Historical, II, Syntax" (1898), Clarendon
- Traugott,E.C, "The History of English Syntax" (1972), Holt, Rinehartand Winston
- Visser, F. Th, "An Historical Syntax of the English Language" (1963), Brill
- Williams,J.M, "Origins of the English Language: A Social and Linguistic History" (1975), Free Press
- Zwicky, A.M, "Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t", Language, 59, pp.502~513 (1983)