영어조동사 do의 발생과 이해
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Periphrastic do plays a central role in the Modern English verbal structure. After pointing out the inconsistency of the other accounts concerning the origin of periphrastic do with the historical evidence I assume that periphrastic do comes from anticipative do in Old English, as advocated in Visser (1965-73). With this assumption, I propose to demonstrate that periphrastic do is base generated in the light v of vP in the framework of Minimalist program, against Platzack (2008)' arguments that periphrastic do is a spelled out version of light v. I also try to show that periphrastic do arose with the introduction of vP in Middle English, which explains how the different sentences with the same meaning such as I did not speak, I not spoke and I spoke not appeared at that time.
Abstract
Periphrastic do plays a central role in the Modern English verbal structure. After pointing out the inconsistency of the other accounts concerning the origin of periphrastic do with the historical evidence I assume that periphrastic do comes from anticipative do in Old English, as advocated in Visser (1965-73). With this assumption, I propose to demonstrate that periphrastic do is base generated in the light v of vP in the framework of Minimalist program, against Platzack (2008)' arguments that periphrastic do is a spelled out version of light v. I also try to show that periphrastic do arose with the introduction of vP in Middle English, which explains how the different sentences with the same meaning such as I did not speak, I not spoke and I spoke not appeared at that time.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김대익, "동사이동과 최소주의", 언어과학, 18(4), pp.1~20 (2011), 한국언어과학회
- 김혜리, "영어 중심서법조동사의 최근 변화", 현대문법연구, 66(66), pp.21~46 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 박상수, "영어 동명사의 통시적 발달과 동명사의 내부 통사 구조", 현대문법연구, 66(66), pp.1~20 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 이필환, "조동사 do의 기원에 대하여", 언어학, 7(2), pp.315~334 (1999)
- 이필환, "영어통시통사론" (1999), 한국문화사
- Chomsky, N, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Some notes on the economy of derivation and representations, In Principle and parameters in comparative grammar", pp.417~454 (1991), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework, In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~157 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in Language", pp.1~53 (2001), MIT Press
- Denison. D., "English historical syntax" (1995), Longman Publishing
- Ellegård, A., "The auxiliary do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English(Volume II of Gothenburg studies in English)" (1953), Göteborg
- Fredin, R, "Syntactic structures redux", Syntax, 7(2), pp.101~127 (2004)
- Garett, A., "On the origin of auxiliary do", English Language & Linguistics, 2(2), pp.283~330 (1988)
- Krock, A., "Reflexives of grammar in patterns of language change: language variation and change, In Comparative grammar", pp.199~244 (1989), Routledge
- Lecher, W, "Interpretive effects of head movement" (2007), University of Tübinggen
- Lightfoot, D, "Principle of diachronic syntax" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Matushansky, O., "Head movement in linguistic theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.69~109 (2006)
- Pintzuk, S, "Verb seconding in Old English: Verb movement to INFL", The Linguistic Review, 10, pp.5~35 (1993)
- Platzack, C., "Cross linguistic variation in the realm of support verbs" (2008), Lund University
- Pollock, J. Y., "Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Poussa, P, "A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE-Celtic contact, In Papers from the 5th international conference on English historical linguistics, Cambridge 6-9 (Current issues in linguistics theory, 65)", pp.407~434 (1990), John Benjamin
- Rissanen, M., "Isn't it or is it not? on the postverbal subject and negative particle in the history of English, In Negation in the history of English", pp.189~205 (1998), Moulton de Gruyter
- Roberts, I., "Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French" (1993), Kluwer
- Roberts, I, "Directionality and word order in the history of English, In Parameters of morphosyntactic change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Stroik, T., "On the light verb hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(2), pp.362~369 (2001)
- Traugott, E., "An history of English syntax" (1972), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- Visser, F. T., "An historical syntax of the English language (4 volumes)" (1973), E. J. Brill