영어조동사 do와 중세영어 문법변화에 대한 추론
An Inference on English Auxiliary do and Grammatical Changes in Middle English
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to offer an inductive account of the emergence of auxiliary do throughout the Early Middle English period. The previous accounts mainly attributed the rise of auxiliary do to various grammatical changes occurring in Middle English, such as the loss of the V2 constraints, re-categorization of pre-modal verbs, the loss of morphological cases, and the loss of V-to-I movement. In this paper, it is argued that these grammatical changes in Middle English as well as the rise of auxiliary do can be understood as a consequence of the change of phasal status in the native speaker's internalized grammars from monodic phase (CP) to dyadic phases (CP, vP) with the introduction of TP and vP in the Early Middle English. Moreover, it is argued that this phasal change also led to the loss of the V2 constraints, the loss of V-to-I raising, the general decline in verbal inflection, and re-categorization of pre-modal verbs. Finally I propose to demonstrate that auxiliary do is base-generated in the light v of vP in the framework of the minimalist program and also try to show that auxiliary do arose with the introduction of vP in the Middle English clause structure, which explains how the different sentences with the same meaning such as I did not speak, I not spoke and I spoke not appeared simultaneously at that time.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to offer an inductive account of the emergence of auxiliary do throughout the Early Middle English period. The previous accounts mainly attributed the rise of auxiliary do to various grammatical changes occurring in Middle English, such as the loss of the V2 constraints, re-categorization of pre-modal verbs, the loss of morphological cases, and the loss of V-to-I movement. In this paper, it is argued that these grammatical changes in Middle English as well as the rise of auxiliary do can be understood as a consequence of the change of phasal status in the native speaker's internalized grammars from monodic phase (CP) to dyadic phases (CP, vP) with the introduction of TP and vP in the Early Middle English. Moreover, it is argued that this phasal change also led to the loss of the V2 constraints, the loss of V-to-I raising, the general decline in verbal inflection, and re-categorization of pre-modal verbs. Finally I propose to demonstrate that auxiliary do is base-generated in the light v of vP in the framework of the minimalist program and also try to show that auxiliary do arose with the introduction of vP in the Middle English clause structure, which explains how the different sentences with the same meaning such as I did not speak, I not spoke and I spoke not appeared simultaneously at that time.
참고문헌 (35)
- 김대익, "고대영어동사의 위치와 도출구조", 언어, 33(3), pp.367~385 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 김대익, "영어조동사 do의 발생과 이해", 언어학, 20(2), pp.41~59 (2012), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 김대익, "고대영어의 표면어순과 어순변화에 대한 새로운 접근 -최소주의의 어순공리개념에 입각하여", 현대문법연구, (68), pp.1~19 (2012), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 김성봉, "통사적 도출에서의 국면", 언어과학, 12(1), pp.41~62 (2005), 한국언어과학회
- 박상수, "고대영어 V-2 구조에서 문두에 오는 요소의 문법기능", 언어과학, 11(1), pp.51~72 (2004), 한국언어과학회
- 박상수, "영어 이중 목적어 어순의 통시적 변화", 언어과학, 14(1), pp.87~107 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- Bobaljik. J. D., "Interaboreal Operations: Head Movement and the Extension Requirement", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.345~356 (1995)
- Chomsky, N., "Syntactic Structures.Mouton" (1957), Mouton
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Culicover, P., "The Rise and Fall of Constructions and the History of English Do-Support", Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 20(1), pp.1~52 (2008)
- Denison, D., "English Historical Syntax" (1995), Longman Publishing
- Ellegård, A., "The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English, volume II of Gothenburg studies in English. Stockholm" (1953), Göteborg
- Fisher, O., "The Syntax of Early English" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Fredin, R., "Syntactic Structures Redux", Syntax, 7(2), pp.101~127 (2004)
- Gelderen, E. van, "The Rise of Functional Categories" (1993), John Benjamins
- Haeberli, E., "Observations on the Loss of Verb Second in the History of English" (2004), University of Geneva
- Hulk, "Verb-Second, Pro-Drop, Functional Projections, and Language Change, In Clause Structure and Language Change", pp.227~256 (1995), Oxford University Press
- Kiparsky, P., "The Rise of Positional Licensing" (1997), Stanford University
- Kemenade, A. van, "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
- Koopman, W. F., "Word Order in Old English; with Special Reference to the Verb Phrase", 박사, pp.1990
- Krock, A, "Reflexives of Grammar in Patterns of Language Change: Language Variation and Change, In Grammar", pp.199~244 (1989), Routledge
- Kroch, A., "Verb-Object Order in Early Middle English, In Diachronic Syntax: Model and Mechanism", pp.132~163 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Jaeger, A., "Grammaticalization Paths of Periphrastic ‘do’- Construction" (2006), Stockholms Universitet
- Lasnik, H., "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program", 석사, pp.1994
- Lightfoot, D., "Principle of Diachronic Syntax" (1979), Cambridge University. Press
- Lightfoot, D., "The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution" (1999), Blackwell
- Perez, J.R.V., "The Use of Periphrastic do in Early Modern English Negative Declaratives: Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus", 석사, pp.1997
- Pintzuk, S., "Verb-Object Order in Old English: Variation as Grammatical Competition, In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Pollock, J. Y., "Verb Movement, UG and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Rissanen, M., "Isn't It or Is It Not? on the Postverbal Subject and Negative Particle in the History of English, In Negation in the History of English", pp.189~205 (1998), Moulton de Gruyter
- Roberts, I., "Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries", Natural language and Linguistic Theory, 3, pp.31~58 (1985)
- Roberts, I., "Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French" (1993), Kluwer
- Roberts, I., "Directionality and Word Order in the History of English, In Parameters of Morpho-Syntactic Change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Visser, F. T, "A Historical Syntax of the English Language 4" (1963), E. J. Brill
- Warner, A. R., "English Auxiliaries: Structure and History" (1993), Cambridge University Press