영어사적 측면에서 동사어형과 어순변화
Verbal Morphology and Word Order Variation in the History of English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to offer an explanatory account of the differences in terms of categorial feature parameter in Old English (OE) and Present-day English (PE). It has been known that OE is different from PE in three things; verbal inflection, the word order of subordinate clause and matrix clause. Firstly, OE has rich verbal inflections which are listed as the inflected form in the lexicon while PE has poor verbal inflections which are the combined form of a root and inflections in the syntax. Secondly, the word order of the OE subordinate clauses is either OV or VO order while that of the PE subordinate clauses is rigid VO order. Lastly, the matrix order of OE clauses shows V2 phenomena in the affirmative while that of PE exhibits no V2 in the affirmative. In this paper these three differences between OE and PE are attributed to whether the category feature of T and V is specified or not in the syntax. Thus it is concluded that the category feature of T and V in OE is specified in the syntax whereas that of T and V in PE is not specified, which shows the differences in verbal inflections and the word order in subordinate and matrix clauses between OE and PF.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to offer an explanatory account of the differences in terms of categorial feature parameter in Old English (OE) and Present-day English (PE). It has been known that OE is different from PE in three things; verbal inflection, the word order of subordinate clause and matrix clause. Firstly, OE has rich verbal inflections which are listed as the inflected form in the lexicon while PE has poor verbal inflections which are the combined form of a root and inflections in the syntax. Secondly, the word order of the OE subordinate clauses is either OV or VO order while that of the PE subordinate clauses is rigid VO order. Lastly, the matrix order of OE clauses shows V2 phenomena in the affirmative while that of PE exhibits no V2 in the affirmative. In this paper these three differences between OE and PE are attributed to whether the category feature of T and V is specified or not in the syntax. Thus it is concluded that the category feature of T and V in OE is specified in the syntax whereas that of T and V in PE is not specified, which shows the differences in verbal inflections and the word order in subordinate and matrix clauses between OE and PF.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김대익, "명찰이론에서의 동사이동과 국면", 새한영어영문학, 58(2), pp.153~171 (2016), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Berwick, R., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.19~41 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Borer, H., "The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax", pp.112~148 (2014), Oxford University Press
- Bean, M. C., "The Development of Word Order Patterns in Old English" (1983), Croom Helm
- Boechx, C., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.205~221 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Canale, M., "Word Order Change in Old English: Base Reanalysis in Generative Grammar", Ph. D., pp.1978
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~53 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On Phase", Ms, pp.2005
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection: Extensions", Unpublished Manuscript. MIT, ~ (2014)
- Denison. D., "English Historical Syntax" (1995), Longman Publishing
- Fisher, O., "The Syntax of Early English" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Fuβ, E., "Variation and Change in Old and Middle English.: On the Validity of the Double Base Hypothesis", Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 4, pp.171~224 (2002)
- Gelderen, E. v., "The Rise of Functional Categories" (1993), John Benjamins
- Gelderen, E. v., "Old, Middle, and Early Modern Morphology and Syntax through Texts", ms, pp.2016
- Goto, Nobu, "Labeling and Parametric Variation in Syntax", Workshop "Current Issues in Comparative Minimalist Syntax," The 34th Annual Meeting of The English Linguistic Society of Japan (2016), Kanazawa University
- Haeberli, E., "Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.88~106 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Heggelund, Ø., "On the Use of Data in Historical Linguistics: Word Order in Early English Subordinate Clauses", Unpublished Manuscript. Telemark University, ~ (2014)
- Holmberg, A., "Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework", pp.61~81 (2014)
- Hulk, A., "Clause Structure and Language Change" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Kemenade, A. van, "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
- Kroch, A., "The Middle English Verb-Second Constraint: a Case Study in Language Contact and Language Change", ms. University of Pennsylvania, ~ (1997)
- Kroch, A., "Verb-object Order in Early Middle English", Unpublished Manuscript. University of Pennsylvania, ~ (2000)
- Lasnik, H., "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program", Unpublished Manuscript. University of Connecticut, ~ (1994)
- Los, Bettelou, "The Rise of the to-infinitive as Verb Complement", English Language and Linguistics, 2, pp.1~36 (1998)
- Pintzuk, S., "Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to INFL", The Linguistic Review, 10, pp.5~35 (1993)
- Pintzuk, S., "Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.276~299 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Roberts, I., "Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change", pp.397~426 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Selvanthan, N., "The Labeling Algorithm and Kirundi Inversion Structures", Studia Linguistica (2017)
- Traugott, E., "A History of English Syntax" (1972), Holt, Reinhart and Winston