A Note on the Local Domain of Binding
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to Binding Conditions A and B, anaphors and pronominals are in complementary distribution within a local domain. One of the fundamental questions about the Binding Conditions is how we can define the notion 'local domain'. Since Chomsky (2001, 2008) claimed that movement and the operation 'AGREE' are phase-bound, there have been many attempts to replace 'local domain' with 'phase'. After pointing out some problems with the previous phase-based approaches to binding such as Quicoli (2008) and Saito (2017, 2018a, 2018b), this study proposes that the local binding domain is a strong phase. Chomsky proposes that there are two types of vP: a strong vP and a weak vP, depending on whether or not v assigns an external theta role. By extending this idea to DP and CP, it is claimed that a phase is strong if the head of the phase discharges all the relevant features. The claim that the strong phase is the binding domain opens up the possibility that binding is an epiphenomenon that follows from ‘AGREE’ or movement.
Abstract
According to Binding Conditions A and B, anaphors and pronominals are in complementary distribution within a local domain. One of the fundamental questions about the Binding Conditions is how we can define the notion 'local domain'. Since Chomsky (2001, 2008) claimed that movement and the operation 'AGREE' are phase-bound, there have been many attempts to replace 'local domain' with 'phase'. After pointing out some problems with the previous phase-based approaches to binding such as Quicoli (2008) and Saito (2017, 2018a, 2018b), this study proposes that the local binding domain is a strong phase. Chomsky proposes that there are two types of vP: a strong vP and a weak vP, depending on whether or not v assigns an external theta role. By extending this idea to DP and CP, it is claimed that a phase is strong if the head of the phase discharges all the relevant features. The claim that the strong phase is the binding domain opens up the possibility that binding is an epiphenomenon that follows from ‘AGREE’ or movement.
참고문헌 (37)
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Bošković, Željco, "Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.27~89 (2014)
- Bruening, Benjamin, "Generalizing the presuppositional approach to the Binding Conditions", Syntax, 24, pp.517~561 (2021)
- Charnavel, Isabelle, "Anaphor Binding: What French Inanimate Anaphors Show", Linguistic Inquiry, 47, pp.35~87 (2016)
- Chomsky, Noam, "On binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.1~46 (1980)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris Publication
- Chomsky, Noam, "Knowledge of language : Its nature, origin, and use" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Interfaces + recursion = language?", pp.129~ (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Chomsky, Noam, "Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.89~155 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Structures, strategies, and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.1~16 (2015), Benjamins Publishing Company
- Chomsky, Noam, "Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research", pp.13~127 (1993), De Gruyter
- Citko, Barbara, "Phase Theory : An Introduction" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Despić, Miolje, "Phases, reflexives, and definiteness", Syntax, 18, pp.201~234 (2015)
- DeipsćMeijloGallego, Ángel J., "Binding through Agree", Linguistic Analysis, 34, pp.163~192 (2010)
- Hicks, Glyn, "The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations" (2009), John Benjamins
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture", Doctor, pp.2005
- Hornstein Norbert, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Move! A theory of construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- Kim, Kwang-sup, "(Anti-) Connectivity", PhD, pp.1998
- Landau, Idan, "Movement Out of Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.471~498 (2003)
- Landau, Idan, "Control in Generative Grammar" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Lee-Schoenfeld, V., "Binding by phase : (Non-) complementarity in German", Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 16, pp.111~173 (2004)
- Legate, Julie Anne, "Some interface properties of the phase", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.506~516 (2003)
- Milsark, Gary, "Existential sentences in English", PhD, pp.1974
- Quicoli, A. Carlos, "Anaphora by phase", Syntax, 11, pp.299~329 (2008)
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
- Richards, Mark, "On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.563~572 (2007)
- Rooryck, Johan, "Dissolving Binding Theory" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Safir, Ken, "The syntax of anaphora" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "A Note on Transfer Domains", Nanzan Linguistics, 12, pp.61~69 (2017)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Notes on the Locality of Anaphor Binding and A-movement", English Linguistics, 34, pp.133~ (2018)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Anaphor binding and A-movement across CPs in the absence of Φ-feature agreement", A paper presented at the KGGC workshop (2018)
- Zubkov, Peter, "The Grammar of Binding: A Study with Reference to Russian", pp.2018, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics